Intermittent versus Daily Therapy for Noncavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease: An Open-label Randomized Trial.

Taku Nakagawa, Kohei Fujita, Mari Miki, Akihiro Ito, Ho Namkoong, Takanori Asakura, Kozo Morimoto, Naoki Hasegawa, Toshiyuki Kita, Akira Watanabe, Kazunari Tsuyuguchi, Masahiro Kawashima, Ayako Shiozawa, Satoru Watanabe, Atsuo Sato, Tatsuo Kato, Yoshifumi Kimizuka, Hiroaki Harada, Kaori Fujita, Akiko M Saito, Hiroya Hashimoto, Yoshikazu Inoue, Kenji Ogawa
{"title":"Intermittent versus Daily Therapy for Noncavitary <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Complex Pulmonary Disease: An Open-label Randomized Trial.","authors":"Taku Nakagawa, Kohei Fujita, Mari Miki, Akihiro Ito, Ho Namkoong, Takanori Asakura, Kozo Morimoto, Naoki Hasegawa, Toshiyuki Kita, Akira Watanabe, Kazunari Tsuyuguchi, Masahiro Kawashima, Ayako Shiozawa, Satoru Watanabe, Atsuo Sato, Tatsuo Kato, Yoshifumi Kimizuka, Hiroaki Harada, Kaori Fujita, Akiko M Saito, Hiroya Hashimoto, Yoshikazu Inoue, Kenji Ogawa","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-626OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale</b>: Patients with noncavitary nodular bronchiectatic (NB) <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) are treated intermittently three times a week, although no randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing three times weekly to daily therapy. <b>Objectives</b>: To assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of intermittent versus daily treatment in patients with previously untreated noncavitary NB MAC-PD <b>Methods</b>: In an open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to the intermittent therapy group receiving clarithromycin 1000 mg, rifampicin 600 mg, and ethambutol 25 mg/kg (maximum 1000 mg) three days a week, or the daily therapy group receiving clarithromycin 800 mg, rifampicin 450 mg, and ethambutol 15 mg/kg (maximum 750 mg) daily for one year. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients requiring modification of the initial treatment regimen. <b>Results</b>: Twenty-one Japanese hospitals participated in the study, enrolling 141 patients between May 2019 and December 2021. The full analysis set included 138 participants (intermittent therapy = 70; daily therapy = 68). There were no significant differences between the intermittent and daily therapy groups in terms of the regimen modification rate (20.0% (14/70) versus 33.8% (23/68); adjusted odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 1.05; p=0.06) or culture conversion (70.3% vs. 80.0%, p=0.53), time to culture conversion (28.0 vs. 28.5 days, p=0.89), improvement in chest CT findings (60.9% vs. 71.0%, p=0.30), or clarithromycin resistance development (1.4% vs. 0%, p=1.00). Elevated AST (16.9% vs. 41.2%, p=0.003) and ALT (18.3% vs. 44.1%, p=0.002) were more common in the daily treatment group, while elevated bilirubin (11.3% vs. 1.5%, p=0.04) and dysgeusia (14.1% vs. 1.5%, p=0.01) were more common in the intermittent treatment group. The daily treatment group exhibited a greater absolute change in the 36-Item Short Form Survey physical aspect score (-2.5 points) than the intermittent treatment group (2.1 points) (p=0.01). <b>Conclusion</b>: Intermittent treatment was not significantly better tolerated than daily treatment for noncavitary NB MAC-PD. However, further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed. Clinical trial registration available at: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-top. ID: jRCTs031190008.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-626OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Patients with noncavitary nodular bronchiectatic (NB) Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) are treated intermittently three times a week, although no randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing three times weekly to daily therapy. Objectives: To assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of intermittent versus daily treatment in patients with previously untreated noncavitary NB MAC-PD Methods: In an open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to the intermittent therapy group receiving clarithromycin 1000 mg, rifampicin 600 mg, and ethambutol 25 mg/kg (maximum 1000 mg) three days a week, or the daily therapy group receiving clarithromycin 800 mg, rifampicin 450 mg, and ethambutol 15 mg/kg (maximum 750 mg) daily for one year. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients requiring modification of the initial treatment regimen. Results: Twenty-one Japanese hospitals participated in the study, enrolling 141 patients between May 2019 and December 2021. The full analysis set included 138 participants (intermittent therapy = 70; daily therapy = 68). There were no significant differences between the intermittent and daily therapy groups in terms of the regimen modification rate (20.0% (14/70) versus 33.8% (23/68); adjusted odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 1.05; p=0.06) or culture conversion (70.3% vs. 80.0%, p=0.53), time to culture conversion (28.0 vs. 28.5 days, p=0.89), improvement in chest CT findings (60.9% vs. 71.0%, p=0.30), or clarithromycin resistance development (1.4% vs. 0%, p=1.00). Elevated AST (16.9% vs. 41.2%, p=0.003) and ALT (18.3% vs. 44.1%, p=0.002) were more common in the daily treatment group, while elevated bilirubin (11.3% vs. 1.5%, p=0.04) and dysgeusia (14.1% vs. 1.5%, p=0.01) were more common in the intermittent treatment group. The daily treatment group exhibited a greater absolute change in the 36-Item Short Form Survey physical aspect score (-2.5 points) than the intermittent treatment group (2.1 points) (p=0.01). Conclusion: Intermittent treatment was not significantly better tolerated than daily treatment for noncavitary NB MAC-PD. However, further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed. Clinical trial registration available at: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-top. ID: jRCTs031190008.

非腔隙分枝杆菌复合肺病间歇疗法与日常疗法的对比:一项开放标签随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信