Ombretta Para, Giuliano Cassataro, Chiara Fantoni, Lorenza Bertù, Claudia Tieri, Lorenzo Caruso, Sara Rotunno, Francesco Dentali
{"title":"Prognostic role of blood eosinophils in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ombretta Para, Giuliano Cassataro, Chiara Fantoni, Lorenza Bertù, Claudia Tieri, Lorenzo Caruso, Sara Rotunno, Francesco Dentali","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is a major cause of hospitalization and mortality worldwide. While blood eosinophils have been suggested as a prognostic biomarker of COPD, their predictive value in AECOPD remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the prognostic role of blood eosinophil counts in predicting mortality and hospital readmission in these patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. We included studies that evaluated the prognostic role of blood eosinophils in AECOPD, with predefined cut-offs. Data on mortality and readmission rates were extracted, and statistical analyses were performed to assess sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. A total of 14 studies with 23,625 patients were included. High blood eosinophil counts during AECOPD hospitalization had low sensitivity (28.1%) and specificity (66.2%) in predicting 12-month mortality and readmission. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were also suboptimal, with values of 0.8 and 1.1, respectively. Sensitivity analyses, including only high-quality studies, confirmed these findings. The results suggest that blood eosinophil counts have limited prognostic value in predicting mortality and readmission in AECOPD patients. The variability in eosinophil cut-offs and lack of consistent data across studies contribute to this limitation. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of eosinophils as a prognostic marker in AECOPD. Consequently, routine measurement of blood eosinophils during acute exacerbations may not be warranted for prognostic purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is a major cause of hospitalization and mortality worldwide. While blood eosinophils have been suggested as a prognostic biomarker of COPD, their predictive value in AECOPD remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the prognostic role of blood eosinophil counts in predicting mortality and hospital readmission in these patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. We included studies that evaluated the prognostic role of blood eosinophils in AECOPD, with predefined cut-offs. Data on mortality and readmission rates were extracted, and statistical analyses were performed to assess sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. A total of 14 studies with 23,625 patients were included. High blood eosinophil counts during AECOPD hospitalization had low sensitivity (28.1%) and specificity (66.2%) in predicting 12-month mortality and readmission. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were also suboptimal, with values of 0.8 and 1.1, respectively. Sensitivity analyses, including only high-quality studies, confirmed these findings. The results suggest that blood eosinophil counts have limited prognostic value in predicting mortality and readmission in AECOPD patients. The variability in eosinophil cut-offs and lack of consistent data across studies contribute to this limitation. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of eosinophils as a prognostic marker in AECOPD. Consequently, routine measurement of blood eosinophils during acute exacerbations may not be warranted for prognostic purposes.