Insights from national stakeholders and health workers on learning and performance interventions in immunisation programs: a multi-country situational analysis.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julia Bluestone, Emily Bryce, Alexander K Rowe, Naina J Ahuja, Wincate M Murathi, Rosemary N Njogu, Arshad Chandio
{"title":"Insights from national stakeholders and health workers on learning and performance interventions in immunisation programs: a multi-country situational analysis.","authors":"Julia Bluestone, Emily Bryce, Alexander K Rowe, Naina J Ahuja, Wincate M Murathi, Rosemary N Njogu, Arshad Chandio","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health workers play a key role in providing high-quality health services, but health worker practice improvements remain limited despite significant investments in learning and performance interventions. We conducted a situational analysis to explore factors affecting health worker performance, focusing on barriers and facilitators and integrating digital solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the analysis we focussed on paid professional health workers. Primary data collection occurred between April-May 2022 across seven countries, involving key informant interviews with immunisation program managers and human resource representatives. In three countries, human-centred design meetings included surveys on preferred interventions for improving learning and performance. Secondary data included a desk review of the literature, including recent strategy documents from the Gavi Alliance. We used a virtual session with human-centred design facilitators to create a health worker learning journey map.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings show a shift towards digital and innovative approaches in learning, though traditional methods, such as in-service training and supervision, still dominate. Most initiatives depend on donor funding. There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of digital solutions. Integration with health workers' continuing professional development processes is limited, but career advancement motivates engagement. Challenges include inadequate staffing, limited training opportunities, and poor digital infrastructure. Preferred methods include workplace-based learning and digitally supported training. Evidence supports quality improvement or group problem-solving to improve practices, while other approaches, such as eLearning or blended learning and mentorship, require further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stakeholders, including donors, should prioritise support for more effective learning approaches, combining strategies to improve outcomes. While stakeholders desire to expand digital learning, given the limited evidence, prioritising effectiveness evaluations are crucial. Educating stakeholders on evidence-based practices, promoting combined strategies, evaluating unproven interventions, and aligning donor funding with effective approaches is critical to enhancing interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04109"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health workers play a key role in providing high-quality health services, but health worker practice improvements remain limited despite significant investments in learning and performance interventions. We conducted a situational analysis to explore factors affecting health worker performance, focusing on barriers and facilitators and integrating digital solutions.

Methods: In the analysis we focussed on paid professional health workers. Primary data collection occurred between April-May 2022 across seven countries, involving key informant interviews with immunisation program managers and human resource representatives. In three countries, human-centred design meetings included surveys on preferred interventions for improving learning and performance. Secondary data included a desk review of the literature, including recent strategy documents from the Gavi Alliance. We used a virtual session with human-centred design facilitators to create a health worker learning journey map.

Results: Our findings show a shift towards digital and innovative approaches in learning, though traditional methods, such as in-service training and supervision, still dominate. Most initiatives depend on donor funding. There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of digital solutions. Integration with health workers' continuing professional development processes is limited, but career advancement motivates engagement. Challenges include inadequate staffing, limited training opportunities, and poor digital infrastructure. Preferred methods include workplace-based learning and digitally supported training. Evidence supports quality improvement or group problem-solving to improve practices, while other approaches, such as eLearning or blended learning and mentorship, require further evaluation.

Conclusions: Stakeholders, including donors, should prioritise support for more effective learning approaches, combining strategies to improve outcomes. While stakeholders desire to expand digital learning, given the limited evidence, prioritising effectiveness evaluations are crucial. Educating stakeholders on evidence-based practices, promoting combined strategies, evaluating unproven interventions, and aligning donor funding with effective approaches is critical to enhancing interventions.

来自国家利益攸关方和卫生工作者关于免疫规划学习和绩效干预措施的见解:多国情景分析。
背景:卫生工作者在提供高质量卫生服务方面发挥着关键作用,但尽管在学习和绩效干预方面进行了大量投资,但卫生工作者实践的改善仍然有限。我们进行了一项情境分析,以探索影响卫生工作者绩效的因素,重点关注障碍和促进因素,并整合数字解决方案。方法:在分析中,我们重点关注有偿专业卫生工作者。主要数据收集于2022年4月至5月期间在7个国家进行,涉及对免疫规划管理人员和人力资源代表的关键信息提供者进行访谈。在三个国家,以人为本的设计会议包括对改善学习和表现的首选干预措施的调查。次要数据包括对文献的案头审查,包括全球疫苗免疫联盟最近的战略文件。我们利用虚拟会议与以人为本的设计促进者一起创建卫生工作者学习旅程地图。结果:我们的研究结果表明,尽管在职培训和监督等传统方法仍然占主导地位,但学习方式正在向数字化和创新方式转变。大多数倡议都依赖于捐助资金。数字解决方案的有效性缺乏证据。与卫生工作者持续专业发展过程的结合是有限的,但职业发展激励参与。挑战包括人员不足、培训机会有限和数字基础设施落后。首选的方法包括基于工作场所的学习和数字支持的培训。证据支持质量改进或小组解决问题来改进实践,而其他方法,如电子学习或混合学习和指导,需要进一步评估。结论:包括捐助者在内的利益相关者应优先支持更有效的学习方法,并结合战略来改善结果。虽然利益相关者希望扩大数字学习,但鉴于证据有限,优先考虑有效性评估至关重要。对利益攸关方进行循证实践教育,促进联合战略,评估未经证实的干预措施,以及将捐助资金与有效方法结合起来,对于加强干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信