The Association Between Annexin A5 c.-302G > T Variant and the Risk of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jintuo Zhou, Yanting Zhu, Ying Liu, Hairong Zhan, Peiguang Niu, Huajiao Chen, Jinhua Zhang
{"title":"The Association Between Annexin A5 c.-302G > T Variant and the Risk of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Jintuo Zhou, Yanting Zhu, Ying Liu, Hairong Zhan, Peiguang Niu, Huajiao Chen, Jinhua Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s43032-025-01848-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of the relationship between Annexin A5 (ANXA5) c.-302G > T variant and susceptibility to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of the literature published before June 17, 2023 using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The odds ratio was used to estimate the correlation of the ANXA5 c.-302 T > G genetic alteration with RPL susceptibility. The I squared (I<sup>2</sup>) statistic and Q statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity among the included studies. And Begg's test and Egger's regression were then conducted to evaluate publication bias. In this meta-analysis, we included seven studies comprising 1535 RPL cases and 1328 healthy pregnant women to investigate the relationship between ANXA5 c.-302G > T variants and the susceptibility of RPL. No significant publication bias was detected across different comparison models. In the overall population analysis, the ANXA5 c.-302G > T variant was positively associated with the risk of RPL under the dominant, allelic, heterozygote and homozygous models. Meta-regression analysis was performed to identify the potential source of heterogeneity, revealing that neither publication year nor country contributed to heterogeneity. Our findings provided robust evidence that the ANXA5 c.-302G > T variant was significantly associated with an increased risk of RPL, highlighting its potential as a genetic marker for identifying women at high risk of developing RPL. These results emphasized the importance of genetic screening in improving the understanding and clinical management of RPL.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-025-01848-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of the relationship between Annexin A5 (ANXA5) c.-302G > T variant and susceptibility to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of the literature published before June 17, 2023 using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The odds ratio was used to estimate the correlation of the ANXA5 c.-302 T > G genetic alteration with RPL susceptibility. The I squared (I2) statistic and Q statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity among the included studies. And Begg's test and Egger's regression were then conducted to evaluate publication bias. In this meta-analysis, we included seven studies comprising 1535 RPL cases and 1328 healthy pregnant women to investigate the relationship between ANXA5 c.-302G > T variants and the susceptibility of RPL. No significant publication bias was detected across different comparison models. In the overall population analysis, the ANXA5 c.-302G > T variant was positively associated with the risk of RPL under the dominant, allelic, heterozygote and homozygous models. Meta-regression analysis was performed to identify the potential source of heterogeneity, revealing that neither publication year nor country contributed to heterogeneity. Our findings provided robust evidence that the ANXA5 c.-302G > T variant was significantly associated with an increased risk of RPL, highlighting its potential as a genetic marker for identifying women at high risk of developing RPL. These results emphasized the importance of genetic screening in improving the understanding and clinical management of RPL.

本研究旨在对Annexin A5(ANXA5)c.-302G > T变异与复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)易感性之间的关系进行全面的荟萃分析。我们使用 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 对 2023 年 6 月 17 日之前发表的文献进行了全面系统的检索。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对纳入研究的质量进行评估。用几率估计 ANXA5 c.-302 T > G 基因改变与 RPL 易感性的相关性。I平方(I2)统计量和Q统计量用于评估纳入研究之间的异质性。然后进行 Begg 检验和 Egger 回归评估发表偏倚。在这项荟萃分析中,我们纳入了7项研究,包括1535名RPL病例和1328名健康孕妇,以探讨ANXA5 c.-302G > T变异与RPL易感性之间的关系。在不同的比较模型中未发现明显的发表偏倚。在总体人群分析中,ANXA5 c.-302G > T变异在显性、等位、杂合子和同源模型下与RPL风险呈正相关。为确定异质性的潜在来源,我们进行了元回归分析,结果显示发表年份和国家均未导致异质性。我们的研究结果提供了强有力的证据,证明 ANXA5 c.-302G > T 变异与 RPL 风险增加显著相关,突出了其作为识别 RPL 高风险女性的遗传标记物的潜力。这些结果强调了基因筛查在提高对 RPL 的认识和临床管理方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信