{"title":"Quantification of abdominal aortic calcification using photon-counting CT angiography: an imaging biomarker for high-risk cardiovascular patients.","authors":"Takashi Ota, Atsushi Nakamoto, Masatoshi Hori, Hideyuki Fukui, Hiromitsu Onishi, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Noriyuki Tomiyama","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-01978-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate abdominal aortic calcification parameters derived from 3D volumetric analysis using photon-counting CT (PCCT) angiography-based virtual non-calcium (VNCa) algorithm as an imaging biomarker for high-risk cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients who underwent abdominal PCCT angiography and non-contrast-enhanced chest CT (nCE-CCT, including CT scanners other than PCCT) between March 2023 and June 2024. Abdominal aortic calcification maps were generated by subtracting VNCa from the corresponding CTA images to calculate the abdominal calcification volume (ACV) and aortic wall volume (AWV). Percentage calcification volume (PCV) was calculated as ACV/AWV. Agatston scores from nCE-CCT classified patients into low- (≤ 100) and high-risk (> 100) CVD groups. Correlations between Agatston score, ACV, and PCV were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the performance and cutoff values of ACV and PCV, with McNemar's test comparing sensitivities and specificities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 200 patients, 163 low- and 37 high-risk patients. Agatston score correlations with ACV and PCV were 0.75 and 0.78, respectively (p < 0.0001). PCV showed a superior AUC (0.94) than ACV (0.90, p = 0.0002). Cutoff values were 5.74 mL for ACV (75.7% sensitivity, 89.0% specificity) and 14.81% for PCV (73.0% sensitivity, 99.4% specificity), and PCV specificity was significantly higher than ACV specificity (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCV > 14.81% indicates an increased CVD risk, suggesting that PCV is a potential imaging biomarker for high-risk patients with CVD. Abdominal CTA alone may identify high-risk patients with CVD, warranting further cardiovascular screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-01978-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate abdominal aortic calcification parameters derived from 3D volumetric analysis using photon-counting CT (PCCT) angiography-based virtual non-calcium (VNCa) algorithm as an imaging biomarker for high-risk cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent abdominal PCCT angiography and non-contrast-enhanced chest CT (nCE-CCT, including CT scanners other than PCCT) between March 2023 and June 2024. Abdominal aortic calcification maps were generated by subtracting VNCa from the corresponding CTA images to calculate the abdominal calcification volume (ACV) and aortic wall volume (AWV). Percentage calcification volume (PCV) was calculated as ACV/AWV. Agatston scores from nCE-CCT classified patients into low- (≤ 100) and high-risk (> 100) CVD groups. Correlations between Agatston score, ACV, and PCV were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the performance and cutoff values of ACV and PCV, with McNemar's test comparing sensitivities and specificities.
Results: The study included 200 patients, 163 low- and 37 high-risk patients. Agatston score correlations with ACV and PCV were 0.75 and 0.78, respectively (p < 0.0001). PCV showed a superior AUC (0.94) than ACV (0.90, p = 0.0002). Cutoff values were 5.74 mL for ACV (75.7% sensitivity, 89.0% specificity) and 14.81% for PCV (73.0% sensitivity, 99.4% specificity), and PCV specificity was significantly higher than ACV specificity (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: PCV > 14.81% indicates an increased CVD risk, suggesting that PCV is a potential imaging biomarker for high-risk patients with CVD. Abdominal CTA alone may identify high-risk patients with CVD, warranting further cardiovascular screening.
期刊介绍:
Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.