Impact of communication modalities on autonomy and social participation of persons with locked-in syndrome.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Impairment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1071/IB24030
Marie-Christine Rousseau, Margaux Hautin, Véronique Blandin, Frédéric Pellas, Pascal Auquier, Karine Baumstarck, Sébastien Lazzarotto
{"title":"Impact of communication modalities on autonomy and social participation of persons with locked-in syndrome.","authors":"Marie-Christine Rousseau, Margaux Hautin, Véronique Blandin, Frédéric Pellas, Pascal Auquier, Karine Baumstarck, Sébastien Lazzarotto","doi":"10.1071/IB24030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Locked-in syndrome (LIS) is a complex neurological condition characterised by paralysis of all four limbs and anarthria. Persons with LIS may communicate via eye blinks/low technology Augmentative and Alternative Communication devices (low tech AAC devices) or may use high technology Augmentative and Alternative Communication devices (high tech AAC devices). Our three objectives were: (1) to describe the distribution of communication modalities used by persons with LIS, (2) to describe the satisfaction of persons with LIS with their communication modality and social participation, and (3) to compare the characteristics and social participation among high tech AAC devices users versus low tech AAC devices or eye blinking users. Methods The questionnaires were sent by e-mail to persons with LIS. Data collected were communication modality, examination of communication ability, satisfaction with the communication modality and contribution of the communication modality to social participation. Results Of the 53 participants, their mean age was 52years, 43% used low tech AAC devices, 43% used high tech AAC devices and 13% communicated via eye blinking. Communication ability was examined in only half the participants. Participants' satisfaction with their communication modality in terms of ergonomics, rapidity, adaptability and functionality were 80, 67, 36 and 47% respectively. Participants who used high tech AAC devices had significantly better e-mail and social network access, could more often initiate conversations and had longer communication durations. Conclusion The communication abilities of persons with LIS should be examined as quickly as possible and repeated regularly. High tech AAC devices should be rapidly and systematically proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Locked-in syndrome (LIS) is a complex neurological condition characterised by paralysis of all four limbs and anarthria. Persons with LIS may communicate via eye blinks/low technology Augmentative and Alternative Communication devices (low tech AAC devices) or may use high technology Augmentative and Alternative Communication devices (high tech AAC devices). Our three objectives were: (1) to describe the distribution of communication modalities used by persons with LIS, (2) to describe the satisfaction of persons with LIS with their communication modality and social participation, and (3) to compare the characteristics and social participation among high tech AAC devices users versus low tech AAC devices or eye blinking users. Methods The questionnaires were sent by e-mail to persons with LIS. Data collected were communication modality, examination of communication ability, satisfaction with the communication modality and contribution of the communication modality to social participation. Results Of the 53 participants, their mean age was 52years, 43% used low tech AAC devices, 43% used high tech AAC devices and 13% communicated via eye blinking. Communication ability was examined in only half the participants. Participants' satisfaction with their communication modality in terms of ergonomics, rapidity, adaptability and functionality were 80, 67, 36 and 47% respectively. Participants who used high tech AAC devices had significantly better e-mail and social network access, could more often initiate conversations and had longer communication durations. Conclusion The communication abilities of persons with LIS should be examined as quickly as possible and repeated regularly. High tech AAC devices should be rapidly and systematically proposed.

沟通方式对闭锁综合症患者自主和社会参与的影响。
导言 锁闭综合症(LIS)是一种复杂的神经系统疾病,以四肢瘫痪和构音障碍为特征。LIS 患者可以通过眨眼/低科技辅助和替代性交流设备(低科技 AAC 设备)或使用高科技辅助和替代性交流设备(高科技 AAC 设备)进行交流。我们的三个目标是(1) 描述 LIS 患者使用的交流方式的分布情况;(2) 描述 LIS 患者对其交流方式和社会参与的满意度;(3) 比较高科技辅助和替代性交流设备使用者与低科技辅助和替代性交流设备或眨眼使用者的特点和社会参与情况。方法 通过电子邮件向 LIS 患者发送调查问卷。收集的数据包括沟通模式、沟通能力检查、对沟通模式的满意度以及沟通模式对社会参与的贡献。结果 53 名参与者的平均年龄为 52 岁,43% 使用低科技辅助交流设备,43% 使用高科技辅助交流设备,13% 通过眨眼进行交流。仅对半数参与者的交流能力进行了检测。在人体工程学、快速性、适应性和功能性方面,参与者对其交流方式的满意度分别为 80%、67%、36% 和 47%。使用高科技辅助交流设备的参与者收发电子邮件和访问社交网络的能力明显更强,能够更频繁地发起对话,交流时间也更长。结论 应尽快检查 LIS 患者的交流能力,并定期重复检查。应快速、系统地推荐高科技辅助交流设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信