COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient‑reported outcome measures: version 2.0.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Joel J Gagnier, Guilherme Tavares de Arruda, Caroline B Terwee, Lidwine B Mokkink
{"title":"COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient‑reported outcome measures: version 2.0.","authors":"Joel J Gagnier, Guilherme Tavares de Arruda, Caroline B Terwee, Lidwine B Mokkink","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-03950-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In 2021 a set of consensus-based and empirically informed reporting recommendations were developed for primary studies of the measurement properties of patient‑reported outcome measures (PROMs). With their use, we determined that certain reporting items were redundant, some required revisions, and additional items were needed. The aim of this study was to update the COSMIN reporting guideline and develop version 2.0 for studies on measurement properties of PROMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were seven phases to this update: 1. Identification of relevant experts for the meeting; 2. Solicitation of written feedback on the existing reporting recommendations checklist; 3. Development of the Explanation & Elaboration document; 4. A face-to-face consensus meeting; 5. Post-meeting revisions of the checklist and Explanation & Elaboration document; 6. Circulation of the resultant manuscripts to experts for solicitation of final feedback, and 7. Completion of the final documents and resultant manuscripts, distribution to all members for approval, and finalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the revised recommendations for version 2.0 consists of 31 general items and 37 specific items. Of the general items, 15 were revised or reordered and one item was added. Of the specific items, 15 were revised or reordered and two new items were added.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend that the earlier version of this guidance (version 1.0) no longer be used. These revised reporting recommendations (version 2.0) will help to guide those reporting or reading these investigations on the essential information that is recommended to be included.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03950-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In 2021 a set of consensus-based and empirically informed reporting recommendations were developed for primary studies of the measurement properties of patient‑reported outcome measures (PROMs). With their use, we determined that certain reporting items were redundant, some required revisions, and additional items were needed. The aim of this study was to update the COSMIN reporting guideline and develop version 2.0 for studies on measurement properties of PROMs.

Methods: There were seven phases to this update: 1. Identification of relevant experts for the meeting; 2. Solicitation of written feedback on the existing reporting recommendations checklist; 3. Development of the Explanation & Elaboration document; 4. A face-to-face consensus meeting; 5. Post-meeting revisions of the checklist and Explanation & Elaboration document; 6. Circulation of the resultant manuscripts to experts for solicitation of final feedback, and 7. Completion of the final documents and resultant manuscripts, distribution to all members for approval, and finalization.

Results: Overall, the revised recommendations for version 2.0 consists of 31 general items and 37 specific items. Of the general items, 15 were revised or reordered and one item was added. Of the specific items, 15 were revised or reordered and two new items were added.

Conclusion: We recommend that the earlier version of this guidance (version 1.0) no longer be used. These revised reporting recommendations (version 2.0) will help to guide those reporting or reading these investigations on the essential information that is recommended to be included.

COSMIN 患者报告结果测量属性研究报告指南:2.0 版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信