Immediate postoperative anesthesia with either lidocaine or bupivacaine: A short-term clinical response.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jessica D Koster, David E Deas, Archontia Palaiologou, David J Lasho, Anibal Diogenes
{"title":"Immediate postoperative anesthesia with either lidocaine or bupivacaine: A short-term clinical response.","authors":"Jessica D Koster, David E Deas, Archontia Palaiologou, David J Lasho, Anibal Diogenes","doi":"10.1002/JPER.25-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this randomized, three-armed clinical trial is to determine if a postoperative injection of 0.5% bupivacaine is more effective than 2% lidocaine in controlling pain after periodontal flap surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six patients planned for similar periodontal surgeries were included. Prior to surgery, patients were randomized to receive one cartridge (1.7 mL) of either 2% lidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, or 0.9% sodium chloride as a local injection immediately postoperatively. A standardized regimen of 600 mg ibuprofen and 325 mg acetaminophen was used to manage postoperative pain. Patients recorded pain levels on a 21-point numerical rating scale (NRS-21) as well as analgesic usage via a phone application at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h, postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While NRS-21 data suggested a consistent trend toward decreased pain with both bupivacaine and lidocaine administration compared with placebo, there were no statistically significant differences in pain response or analgesic usage at any time between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed no statistically significant differences in pain or analgesic usage after periodontal flap surgery following postoperative injections with either bupivacaine, lidocaine, or placebo.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Long-acting local anesthetic, notably bupivacaine, has been given immediately following dental procedures to reduce the amount of postoperative pain and discomfort. This study aimed to study the immediate effects of bupivacaine compared with a shorter acting local anesthetic (lidocaine) and a placebo (0.9% sodium chloride). Seventy-six patients underwent various dental surgeries where reflection of the soft tissue was performed. At the conclusion of surgery, patients were randomized into one of the three groups and the appropriate blinded cartridge of bupivacaine, lidocaine, or placebo was injected into the surgical site. Patients reported their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (NRS-21) as well as the number of pain medications taken via a phone application at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after the surgery. Demographic and secondary variables such as amount of anesthetic given and length of surgery were also collected. While NRS-21 data suggested a consistent trend toward decreased pain with both bupivacaine and lidocaine administration compared with placebo, there were no significant differences in pain response or pain medication usage at any time between the three groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.25-0045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this randomized, three-armed clinical trial is to determine if a postoperative injection of 0.5% bupivacaine is more effective than 2% lidocaine in controlling pain after periodontal flap surgery.

Methods: Seventy-six patients planned for similar periodontal surgeries were included. Prior to surgery, patients were randomized to receive one cartridge (1.7 mL) of either 2% lidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, or 0.9% sodium chloride as a local injection immediately postoperatively. A standardized regimen of 600 mg ibuprofen and 325 mg acetaminophen was used to manage postoperative pain. Patients recorded pain levels on a 21-point numerical rating scale (NRS-21) as well as analgesic usage via a phone application at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h, postoperatively.

Results: While NRS-21 data suggested a consistent trend toward decreased pain with both bupivacaine and lidocaine administration compared with placebo, there were no statistically significant differences in pain response or analgesic usage at any time between the three groups.

Conclusions: This study showed no statistically significant differences in pain or analgesic usage after periodontal flap surgery following postoperative injections with either bupivacaine, lidocaine, or placebo.

Plain language summary: Long-acting local anesthetic, notably bupivacaine, has been given immediately following dental procedures to reduce the amount of postoperative pain and discomfort. This study aimed to study the immediate effects of bupivacaine compared with a shorter acting local anesthetic (lidocaine) and a placebo (0.9% sodium chloride). Seventy-six patients underwent various dental surgeries where reflection of the soft tissue was performed. At the conclusion of surgery, patients were randomized into one of the three groups and the appropriate blinded cartridge of bupivacaine, lidocaine, or placebo was injected into the surgical site. Patients reported their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (NRS-21) as well as the number of pain medications taken via a phone application at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after the surgery. Demographic and secondary variables such as amount of anesthetic given and length of surgery were also collected. While NRS-21 data suggested a consistent trend toward decreased pain with both bupivacaine and lidocaine administration compared with placebo, there were no significant differences in pain response or pain medication usage at any time between the three groups.

术后立即使用利多卡因或布比卡因进行麻醉:短期临床反应。
背景:这项随机三臂临床试验的目的是确定术后注射0.5%布比卡因是否比2%利多卡因更有效地控制牙周皮瓣术后疼痛。方法:选取拟行牙周手术的患者76例。术前,患者随机接受一盒(1.7 mL) 2%利多卡因、0.5%布比卡因或0.9%氯化钠作为术后立即局部注射。600毫克布洛芬和325毫克对乙酰氨基酚的标准化方案用于治疗术后疼痛。患者在术后4、8、12、24和48小时通过电话应用记录了21点数值评定量表(NRS-21)的疼痛水平以及止痛药的使用情况。结果:虽然NRS-21数据显示,与安慰剂相比,布比卡因和利多卡因均有减轻疼痛的一致趋势,但三组之间在任何时候的疼痛反应或止痛药使用方面均无统计学显著差异。结论:本研究显示,术后注射布比卡因、利多卡因或安慰剂后牙周瓣手术后疼痛或镇痛药物的使用无统计学差异。简单的语言总结:在牙科手术后立即给予长效局部麻醉剂,特别是布比卡因,以减少术后疼痛和不适。本研究旨在研究布比卡因与短效局麻药(利多卡因)和安慰剂(0.9%氯化钠)的即时效果。76名患者接受了各种牙科手术,并对软组织进行了反射。在手术结束时,患者被随机分为三组之一,并在手术部位注射相应的布比卡因、利多卡因或安慰剂盲法药筒。患者在0-10 (NRS-21)的数值评定量表上报告他们的疼痛,以及在手术后4、8、12、24和48小时通过电话应用程序服用的止痛药数量。还收集了人口统计学和次要变量,如麻醉剂量和手术时间。虽然NRS-21数据显示,与安慰剂相比,布比卡因和利多卡因均有减轻疼痛的一致趋势,但三组之间在任何时候的疼痛反应或止痛药使用方面均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信