The risks of omitting routine postoperative imaging after insertion of new ventricular shunts in children: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael J Stuart, Annabelle M Harbison, Timothy Ruder, Joshua Hackney, Norman Ma, Robert A J Campbell, Amelia J Jardim, Liam G Coulthard
{"title":"The risks of omitting routine postoperative imaging after insertion of new ventricular shunts in children: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Michael J Stuart, Annabelle M Harbison, Timothy Ruder, Joshua Hackney, Norman Ma, Robert A J Campbell, Amelia J Jardim, Liam G Coulthard","doi":"10.3171/2024.12.PEDS24496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion is the primary treatment for pediatric hydrocephalus and is one of the most common procedures performed in pediatric neurosurgery. However, the value of routine postoperative imaging remains controversial. Although some evidence suggests that routine postoperative imaging provides a low yield after shunt revision, its role following initial shunt insertion in children has not been reported. Additionally, the role of routine postoperative imaging as a baseline study in altering the rate of longer-term shunt revision rates remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted using a prospectively maintained surgical database, encompassing 10 years of consecutive cases from a quaternary pediatric neurosurgical center serving a population of 5.3 million. Statewide electronic medical records including imaging and mortality data were reviewed. Only cases involving the insertion of a new ventricular shunt system were included. Based on longstanding physician preferences, approximately half the neurosurgeons in the department did not routinely perform postoperative imaging during the study period. The primary outcomes were shunt-related mortality during the study period, shunt revision or mortality within 7 days of surgery, or hospital discharge, with time to first revision as a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period 1485 shunt procedures were performed, of which 427 involved the placement of a new ventriculoperitoneal shunt system. The mean age of the patients was 5.2 years (range premature to 18 years). A total of 206/427 (48%) underwent routine postoperative imaging with MR or CT, and 153/427 (36%) underwent routine postoperative shunt series radiographs. During the study period, 2 abdominal radiographs identified preperitoneal placement; however, in both cases a symptomatic subcutaneous fluid collection was present (2/427, 0.5%). Postoperative CT or MR studies identified 1 case of extraventricular catheter placement and 5 cases of a kink adjacent to the valve (6/427, 1.4%), of which 4 cases were detected on routine imaging (4/427, 0.9%). No significant differences were detected between patients with or without imaging in 7-day postoperative (14 [7%] vs 8 [4%], p = 0.25) or 7-day postdischarge (2 [1%] vs 1 [< 1%], p = 0.96) rates of noninfective shunt revision, shunt-related mortality (4 [2%] vs 5 [2%], respectively, p = 0.8) or Kaplan-Meier long-term shunt survival curves (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine postoperative imaging after pediatric shunt insertion rarely identifies clinically significant issues, and consideration could be given to its omission.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.PEDS24496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion is the primary treatment for pediatric hydrocephalus and is one of the most common procedures performed in pediatric neurosurgery. However, the value of routine postoperative imaging remains controversial. Although some evidence suggests that routine postoperative imaging provides a low yield after shunt revision, its role following initial shunt insertion in children has not been reported. Additionally, the role of routine postoperative imaging as a baseline study in altering the rate of longer-term shunt revision rates remains unexplored.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted using a prospectively maintained surgical database, encompassing 10 years of consecutive cases from a quaternary pediatric neurosurgical center serving a population of 5.3 million. Statewide electronic medical records including imaging and mortality data were reviewed. Only cases involving the insertion of a new ventricular shunt system were included. Based on longstanding physician preferences, approximately half the neurosurgeons in the department did not routinely perform postoperative imaging during the study period. The primary outcomes were shunt-related mortality during the study period, shunt revision or mortality within 7 days of surgery, or hospital discharge, with time to first revision as a secondary outcome.

Results: During the study period 1485 shunt procedures were performed, of which 427 involved the placement of a new ventriculoperitoneal shunt system. The mean age of the patients was 5.2 years (range premature to 18 years). A total of 206/427 (48%) underwent routine postoperative imaging with MR or CT, and 153/427 (36%) underwent routine postoperative shunt series radiographs. During the study period, 2 abdominal radiographs identified preperitoneal placement; however, in both cases a symptomatic subcutaneous fluid collection was present (2/427, 0.5%). Postoperative CT or MR studies identified 1 case of extraventricular catheter placement and 5 cases of a kink adjacent to the valve (6/427, 1.4%), of which 4 cases were detected on routine imaging (4/427, 0.9%). No significant differences were detected between patients with or without imaging in 7-day postoperative (14 [7%] vs 8 [4%], p = 0.25) or 7-day postdischarge (2 [1%] vs 1 [< 1%], p = 0.96) rates of noninfective shunt revision, shunt-related mortality (4 [2%] vs 5 [2%], respectively, p = 0.8) or Kaplan-Meier long-term shunt survival curves (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Routine postoperative imaging after pediatric shunt insertion rarely identifies clinically significant issues, and consideration could be given to its omission.

一项10年回顾性队列研究:儿童新心室分流术插入后忽略常规术后影像学检查的风险
目的:脑室腹腔分流术是小儿脑积水的主要治疗方法,也是小儿神经外科中最常见的手术之一。然而,常规术后影像学的价值仍然存在争议。尽管有证据表明,常规术后影像学检查在分流器翻修后的预后较低,但其在儿童分流器初次插入后的作用尚未见报道。此外,常规术后影像学作为基线研究在改变长期分流修复率方面的作用仍未被探索。方法:使用前瞻性维护的外科数据库进行回顾性研究,包括一家第四儿科神经外科中心为530万人口服务的连续10年病例。审查了包括成像和死亡率数据在内的全州电子医疗记录。仅包括涉及插入新的心室分流系统的病例。基于长期以来医生的偏好,在研究期间,该科大约一半的神经外科医生没有常规地进行术后影像学检查。主要结局是研究期间与分流相关的死亡率,手术后7天内的分流修复或死亡率,或出院,第一次修复的时间作为次要结局。结果:在研究期间进行了1485例分流手术,其中427例涉及放置新的脑室-腹膜分流系统。患者平均年龄5.2岁(早产儿至18岁)。共有206/427例(48%)接受了术后常规MR或CT成像,153/427例(36%)接受了术后常规分流系列x线片。在研究期间,2张腹部x线片确定了腹膜前放置;然而,两例患者均出现症状性皮下积液(2/ 427,0.5%)。术后CT或MR检查发现室外置管1例,瓣膜附近扭结5例(6/427,1.4%),其中常规影像学检查发现4例(4/427,0.9%)。术后7天(14 [7%]vs 8 [4%], p = 0.25)、出院后7天(2 [1%]vs 1 [< 1%], p = 0.96)非感染性分流器翻修率、分流器相关死亡率(分别为4 [2%]vs 5 [2%], p = 0.8)或Kaplan-Meier长期分流器生存曲线(均p = 0.05)均无显著差异。结论:儿童分流器插入后的常规术后影像学很少发现临床意义重大的问题,可以考虑其遗漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信