Wider means worsen? Influence of QRS duration of left bundle branch block on prognosis of patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jiajun Pan, Zhimin Zhao, Bailing Li, Hao Zhang, Chengliang Cai, Yun Tao, Fan Qiao, Fanglin Lu, Lin Han, Zhiyun Xu
{"title":"Wider means worsen? Influence of QRS duration of left bundle branch block on prognosis of patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Jiajun Pan, Zhimin Zhao, Bailing Li, Hao Zhang, Chengliang Cai, Yun Tao, Fan Qiao, Fanglin Lu, Lin Han, Zhiyun Xu","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000041940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of QRS duration on postoperative LBBB and its implications for the prognosis of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remained uncertain. This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with self-expanding prostheses in our department from September 2017 to January 2021. Based on the pro-discharge electrocardiogram, patients were categorized into 3 groups: Group-NCD (no conduction disorder), Group-sLBBB (LBBB, QRS ≥ 150 ms), and Group-mLBBB (LBBB, QRS < 150 ms). Basic characteristics were compared among these groups. Furthermore, differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), survival rates, and clinical events were assessed at baseline, discharge, and during a one-year follow-up period. A total of 56 patients were included in the study. With 17 (30.36%) experiencing new-onset LBBB, of which eleven had a QRS duration ≥ 150 ms. Group-sLBBB exhibited a longer left ventricular end-diastolic diameter at baseline. At a one-year follow-up, the LVEF improved in Group-NCD, but not in the LBBB groups. At discharge, the LVEF of Group-sLBBB was lower than that of Group-NCD (52.82 ± 11.48 vs 61.48 ± 10.10, P = .036) and remained lower at follow-up (57.10 ± 9.49 vs 65.85 ± 7.58, P = .011). Additionally, the LVEF of Group-sLBBB was lower than that of Group-mLBBB at discharge (52.82 ± 11.48 vs 63.17 ± 4.31, P = .018). However, there were no significant differences in survival and event-free survival among the groups. The study revealed a notable occurrence of new-onset LBBB following TAVR, with a majority of cases exhibiting a significantly prolonged QRS duration (≥150 ms). While the presence of LBBB did not impact one-year survival or clinical events, it did exert adverse effects on LVEF. Notably, when QRS duration was markedly prolonged, these adverse effects manifested earlier and were more pronounced.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 13","pages":"e41940"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of QRS duration on postoperative LBBB and its implications for the prognosis of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remained uncertain. This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with self-expanding prostheses in our department from September 2017 to January 2021. Based on the pro-discharge electrocardiogram, patients were categorized into 3 groups: Group-NCD (no conduction disorder), Group-sLBBB (LBBB, QRS ≥ 150 ms), and Group-mLBBB (LBBB, QRS < 150 ms). Basic characteristics were compared among these groups. Furthermore, differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), survival rates, and clinical events were assessed at baseline, discharge, and during a one-year follow-up period. A total of 56 patients were included in the study. With 17 (30.36%) experiencing new-onset LBBB, of which eleven had a QRS duration ≥ 150 ms. Group-sLBBB exhibited a longer left ventricular end-diastolic diameter at baseline. At a one-year follow-up, the LVEF improved in Group-NCD, but not in the LBBB groups. At discharge, the LVEF of Group-sLBBB was lower than that of Group-NCD (52.82 ± 11.48 vs 61.48 ± 10.10, P = .036) and remained lower at follow-up (57.10 ± 9.49 vs 65.85 ± 7.58, P = .011). Additionally, the LVEF of Group-sLBBB was lower than that of Group-mLBBB at discharge (52.82 ± 11.48 vs 63.17 ± 4.31, P = .018). However, there were no significant differences in survival and event-free survival among the groups. The study revealed a notable occurrence of new-onset LBBB following TAVR, with a majority of cases exhibiting a significantly prolonged QRS duration (≥150 ms). While the presence of LBBB did not impact one-year survival or clinical events, it did exert adverse effects on LVEF. Notably, when QRS duration was markedly prolonged, these adverse effects manifested earlier and were more pronounced.

QRS持续时间对术后LBBB的影响及其对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者预后的影响仍不确定。本研究招募了2017年9月至2021年1月在我科接受自扩张假体TAVR的连续患者。根据出院前的心电图,患者被分为 3 组:组-NCD(无传导障碍)、组-sLBBB(LBBB,QRS ≥ 150 ms)和组-mLBBB(LBBB,QRS
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信