Preferences, Expectations and Attitudes on Basal Insulin from Patient-Physician-Payer Perspective: A Multi-stakeholder Survey by the Italian Diabetes Society (ITA4P Study).
Gian Paolo Fadini, Stefano Ciardullo, Gianluca Perseghin, Carla Giordano, Ernesto Maddaloni, Raffaella Buzzetti, Mariangela Ghiani, Angelo Avogaro
{"title":"Preferences, Expectations and Attitudes on Basal Insulin from Patient-Physician-Payer Perspective: A Multi-stakeholder Survey by the Italian Diabetes Society (ITA4P Study).","authors":"Gian Paolo Fadini, Stefano Ciardullo, Gianluca Perseghin, Carla Giordano, Ernesto Maddaloni, Raffaella Buzzetti, Mariangela Ghiani, Angelo Avogaro","doi":"10.1007/s13300-025-01729-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes management often involves complex insulin regimens, posing significant challenges for patients and healthcare systems. Weekly basal insulin formulations aim to simplify treatment, reduce injection frequency, and improve adherence and quality of life. This study explored the beliefs, preferences and attitudes of patients, physicians and payers regarding current basal insulin therapy and weekly insulin formulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey with structured questionnaires was developed for multiple stakeholders: patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, physicians and payers. Participants provided self-reported insights into basal insulin therapy and perceptions of weekly formulations. Results are presented in a descriptive non-analytical way.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1094 patients, 468 physicians and 100 payers participated. Patients reported moderate satisfaction with current insulin therapy, with lower satisfaction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The major burdens identified were daily injections and fear of hypoglycaemia, with weekly insulin seen as a promising alternative. Physicians prioritized glycaemic control goals, while patients emphasized independence and quality of life. Payers valued adherence and hypoglycaemia avoidance but raised concerns about costs and education needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to this multi-stakeholder survey, weekly basal insulin offers a promising approach to reduce treatment burden and improve adherence and quality of life. Addressing concerns about safety, efficacy and cost will be critical to its successful adoption in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01729-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes management often involves complex insulin regimens, posing significant challenges for patients and healthcare systems. Weekly basal insulin formulations aim to simplify treatment, reduce injection frequency, and improve adherence and quality of life. This study explored the beliefs, preferences and attitudes of patients, physicians and payers regarding current basal insulin therapy and weekly insulin formulations.
Methods: An online survey with structured questionnaires was developed for multiple stakeholders: patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, physicians and payers. Participants provided self-reported insights into basal insulin therapy and perceptions of weekly formulations. Results are presented in a descriptive non-analytical way.
Results: A total of 1094 patients, 468 physicians and 100 payers participated. Patients reported moderate satisfaction with current insulin therapy, with lower satisfaction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The major burdens identified were daily injections and fear of hypoglycaemia, with weekly insulin seen as a promising alternative. Physicians prioritized glycaemic control goals, while patients emphasized independence and quality of life. Payers valued adherence and hypoglycaemia avoidance but raised concerns about costs and education needs.
Conclusions: According to this multi-stakeholder survey, weekly basal insulin offers a promising approach to reduce treatment burden and improve adherence and quality of life. Addressing concerns about safety, efficacy and cost will be critical to its successful adoption in clinical practice.
期刊介绍：
Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
