Evaluating comparative effectiveness of pembrolizumab-based therapy versus chemotherapy in treatment of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Haleema Mansoor, Maheen Gohar, Asma Attaria, Faiza Fatima Karim, Umaimah Naeem, Mohsin Khan, Javed Iqbal
{"title":"Evaluating comparative effectiveness of pembrolizumab-based therapy versus chemotherapy in treatment of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Haleema Mansoor, Maheen Gohar, Asma Attaria, Faiza Fatima Karim, Umaimah Naeem, Mohsin Khan, Javed Iqbal","doi":"10.1007/s10238-025-01610-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer, especially cancer of the gastro-esophageal junction, ranks among the first five cancers in the world with the highest mortality rates. It has poor survival rates for the advanced stages. Traditional chemotherapy, while standard, often results in significant side effects and limited efficacy. The objective of this meta-analysis and systemic review is to ascertain if pembrolizumab-based therapies for advanced gastric cancer are more effective and safer than standard chemotherapy. The focus consisted of RCTs with adults suffering from gastric carcinoma who received pembrolizumab every 3 weeks (200 mg) intra-related dose or with at least comparable chemotherapy regimen. Outcomes assessed are as follows: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). All potential sources regarding the search of outcome measures were applied: Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane library, and last search in June 2024 was carried out. Out of 568 articles screened, four RCTs comprising 2,831 patients met the inclusion criteria. Analysis indicated that pembrolizumab alone did not significantly improve OS compared to chemotherapy (HR 0.87). However, when combined with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab dramatically enhanced OS (HR 0.80) and PFS (HR 0.78). ORR was superior in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group (RR 1.24), while pembrolizumab monotherapy showed no significant difference from chemotherapy alone. Safety analysis revealed a higher frequency of adverse events in the pembrolizumab-based therapy groups compared to chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab together with chemotherapy improves greater survival and higher levels of response rate in patients with severe gastric cancer, especially with high PD-L1 expression. But it has rather more adverse events, allowing patient monitoring with care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"98"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01610-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastric cancer, especially cancer of the gastro-esophageal junction, ranks among the first five cancers in the world with the highest mortality rates. It has poor survival rates for the advanced stages. Traditional chemotherapy, while standard, often results in significant side effects and limited efficacy. The objective of this meta-analysis and systemic review is to ascertain if pembrolizumab-based therapies for advanced gastric cancer are more effective and safer than standard chemotherapy. The focus consisted of RCTs with adults suffering from gastric carcinoma who received pembrolizumab every 3 weeks (200 mg) intra-related dose or with at least comparable chemotherapy regimen. Outcomes assessed are as follows: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). All potential sources regarding the search of outcome measures were applied: Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane library, and last search in June 2024 was carried out. Out of 568 articles screened, four RCTs comprising 2,831 patients met the inclusion criteria. Analysis indicated that pembrolizumab alone did not significantly improve OS compared to chemotherapy (HR 0.87). However, when combined with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab dramatically enhanced OS (HR 0.80) and PFS (HR 0.78). ORR was superior in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group (RR 1.24), while pembrolizumab monotherapy showed no significant difference from chemotherapy alone. Safety analysis revealed a higher frequency of adverse events in the pembrolizumab-based therapy groups compared to chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab together with chemotherapy improves greater survival and higher levels of response rate in patients with severe gastric cancer, especially with high PD-L1 expression. But it has rather more adverse events, allowing patient monitoring with care.

评估以派姆单抗为基础的治疗与化疗在胃癌治疗中的比较效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
胃癌,特别是胃-食管交界处的癌症,是世界上死亡率最高的五大癌症之一。晚期的存活率很低。传统的化疗虽然是标准的,但往往会导致严重的副作用和有限的疗效。本荟萃分析和系统评价的目的是确定基于派姆单抗的晚期胃癌治疗是否比标准化疗更有效和更安全。焦点包括胃癌患者每3周(200 mg)接受派姆单抗相关剂量或至少接受类似化疗方案的成人随机对照试验。评估的结果如下:总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。应用了关于结果测量的所有潜在来源:谷歌Scholar、Scopus、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆,最后一次检索是在2024年6月进行的。在筛选的568篇文章中,有4篇rct(包括2831名患者)符合纳入标准。分析表明,与化疗相比,单独使用派姆单抗并没有显著改善OS (HR 0.87)。然而,当与化疗联合使用时,派姆单抗显著提高了OS (HR 0.80)和PFS (HR 0.78)。pembrolizumab联合化疗组的ORR更优(RR 1.24),而pembrolizumab单药治疗与单独化疗无显著差异。安全性分析显示,与化疗相比,以派姆单抗为基础的治疗组出现不良事件的频率更高。Pembrolizumab联合化疗可提高严重胃癌患者的生存率和更高的缓解率,特别是PD-L1高表达患者。但它有更多的不良事件,允许患者谨慎监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信