Understanding Capacity to Treat First Episode Psychosis with a Hybrid Telemental Health Delivery Model: A Needs Assessment of Ohio Community Mental Health Centers.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Brian P O'Rourke, Jennifer L Hefner, Nicholas J K Breitborde, Vicki L Montesano, Kraig Knudsen, Tory H Hogan
{"title":"Understanding Capacity to Treat First Episode Psychosis with a Hybrid Telemental Health Delivery Model: A Needs Assessment of Ohio Community Mental Health Centers.","authors":"Brian P O'Rourke, Jennifer L Hefner, Nicholas J K Breitborde, Vicki L Montesano, Kraig Knudsen, Tory H Hogan","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01437-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coordinated specialty care (CSC) is considered the gold-standard treatment for individuals experiencing first episode psychosis (FEP). However, CSC teams are resource-intensive, motivating the development of a hybrid delivery approach where community mental health centers (CMHCs) collaborate with an academic medical center to deliver a mix of in-person and virtual services. To inform the development of this hybrid approach, a needs assessment was conducted, evaluating the existing capacity of Ohio CMHCs to treat FEP and identifying barriers to expanded use of telemental health. CMHC administrators throughout Ohio whose agencies primarily provide mental health services were surveyed using a novel instrument. A concurrent mixed methods approach combined multivariable analysis of cross-sectional survey data with thematic coding of responses to open-ended questions. The 56 responding CMHCs on average offered 10.96 of 17 services associated with CSC for FEP. Agency size was positively associated with number of service offerings, but rurality was not. Most agencies perceived gaps in their care for patients with FEP, particularly rural CMHCs. 75% believed that telemental health service expansion would benefit patients. Thematic analysis revealed three success factors for expanded telemental health usage: adapting care to virtual assessment, ensuring patient access, and adjusting workflows for virtual delivery. Responding CMHCs generally agreed that care for individuals with FEP could be improved and saw potential in expanded use of virtual services. Hybrid models may represent a valuable opportunity to overcome conventional barriers to CSC availability, but their development must account for current CMHC resource infrastructure and workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"584-593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-025-01437-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coordinated specialty care (CSC) is considered the gold-standard treatment for individuals experiencing first episode psychosis (FEP). However, CSC teams are resource-intensive, motivating the development of a hybrid delivery approach where community mental health centers (CMHCs) collaborate with an academic medical center to deliver a mix of in-person and virtual services. To inform the development of this hybrid approach, a needs assessment was conducted, evaluating the existing capacity of Ohio CMHCs to treat FEP and identifying barriers to expanded use of telemental health. CMHC administrators throughout Ohio whose agencies primarily provide mental health services were surveyed using a novel instrument. A concurrent mixed methods approach combined multivariable analysis of cross-sectional survey data with thematic coding of responses to open-ended questions. The 56 responding CMHCs on average offered 10.96 of 17 services associated with CSC for FEP. Agency size was positively associated with number of service offerings, but rurality was not. Most agencies perceived gaps in their care for patients with FEP, particularly rural CMHCs. 75% believed that telemental health service expansion would benefit patients. Thematic analysis revealed three success factors for expanded telemental health usage: adapting care to virtual assessment, ensuring patient access, and adjusting workflows for virtual delivery. Responding CMHCs generally agreed that care for individuals with FEP could be improved and saw potential in expanded use of virtual services. Hybrid models may represent a valuable opportunity to overcome conventional barriers to CSC availability, but their development must account for current CMHC resource infrastructure and workflows.

理解能力治疗首次发作精神病与混合远程精神卫生交付模式:俄亥俄州社区精神卫生中心的需求评估。
协调专科护理(CSC)被认为是个体经历首发精神病(FEP)的金标准治疗。然而,CSC团队是资源密集型的,这推动了混合交付方法的发展,即社区精神卫生中心(CMHCs)与学术医疗中心合作,提供面对面和虚拟服务的混合。为了为这种混合方法的发展提供信息,开展了需求评估,评估了俄亥俄州医疗保健中心治疗慢性心力衰竭的现有能力,并确定了扩大使用远程心理健康的障碍。俄亥俄州的CMHC管理人员主要提供心理健康服务,他们使用一种新的工具进行了调查。并行混合方法方法结合多变量分析横断面调查数据与主题编码回答开放式问题。56家作出回应的医疗保健中心平均提供17项与慢性心力障碍相关的服务中的10.96项。机构规模与提供的服务数量呈正相关,但乡村性与之无关。大多数机构认为他们对FEP患者的护理存在差距,特别是农村的cmhc。75%的人认为扩大远程卫生服务将使患者受益。专题分析揭示了扩大远程卫生使用的三个成功因素:使护理适应虚拟评估、确保患者获得和调整虚拟交付的工作流程。做出回应的cmhc普遍认为,对FEP患者的护理可以得到改善,并看到了扩大使用虚拟服务的潜力。混合模型可能为克服CSC可用性的传统障碍提供了宝贵的机会,但是它们的开发必须考虑到当前的CMHC资源基础设施和工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信