Influence of artificial tears on corneal parameter measurement using three different devices: Keratometry and Scheimpflug technology, a randomized trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Titus Schug, Thomas Kohnen, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Christoph Lwowski
{"title":"Influence of artificial tears on corneal parameter measurement using three different devices: Keratometry and Scheimpflug technology, a randomized trial.","authors":"Titus Schug, Thomas Kohnen, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Christoph Lwowski","doi":"10.1111/aos.17487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of artificial tear (AT) application on the repeatability of corneal parameters with three different devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 145 patients were measured with one of three devices in the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Two baseline measurements and four measurements following AT application after 30 s, 2, 5 and 10 min were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight eyes were measured with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Port, Switzerland), and 49 with the Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) (145 total). Repeatability of the mean corneal power (K<sub>m</sub>) between baseline measurements was high (0.049 ± 0.008 D for IOLMaster, 0.061 ± 0.011 for the Pentacam AXL and 0.065 ± 0.009 for Galilei G6) but significantly variable after 30 s and 2 min for IOLMaster 700 (0.177 ± 0.021 D, p < 0.001 and 0.079 ± 0.009, p = 0.004) and Galilei G6 (0.163 ± 0.020 D, p < 0.001 and 0.119 ± 0.014 D, p = 0.003). K<sub>m</sub> differed significantly from baseline at 30 s, 2 and 5 min with Pentacam AXL (0.215 ± 0.041 D, p < 0.001; 0.157 ± 0.025 D, p < 0.001 and 0.094 ± 0.012 D, p = 0.007). Variability was highest at 30 s and decreased over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of AT leads to high variability of keratometric measurements for each device. This should be considered after use, and at least 5 min should elapse before measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of artificial tear (AT) application on the repeatability of corneal parameters with three different devices.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 145 patients were measured with one of three devices in the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Two baseline measurements and four measurements following AT application after 30 s, 2, 5 and 10 min were performed.

Results: Forty-eight eyes were measured with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Port, Switzerland), and 49 with the Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) (145 total). Repeatability of the mean corneal power (Km) between baseline measurements was high (0.049 ± 0.008 D for IOLMaster, 0.061 ± 0.011 for the Pentacam AXL and 0.065 ± 0.009 for Galilei G6) but significantly variable after 30 s and 2 min for IOLMaster 700 (0.177 ± 0.021 D, p < 0.001 and 0.079 ± 0.009, p = 0.004) and Galilei G6 (0.163 ± 0.020 D, p < 0.001 and 0.119 ± 0.014 D, p = 0.003). Km differed significantly from baseline at 30 s, 2 and 5 min with Pentacam AXL (0.215 ± 0.041 D, p < 0.001; 0.157 ± 0.025 D, p < 0.001 and 0.094 ± 0.012 D, p = 0.007). Variability was highest at 30 s and decreased over time.

Conclusion: The use of AT leads to high variability of keratometric measurements for each device. This should be considered after use, and at least 5 min should elapse before measurements.

人工泪液对角膜参数测量的影响,使用三种不同的设备:角膜测量仪和Scheimpflug技术,一项随机试验。
目的:评价人工泪液(AT)应用对角膜参数重复性的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性随机临床试验中,145名患者使用德国法兰克福歌德大学眼科的三种仪器中的一种进行测量。在应用AT后30 s、2、5和10 min进行2次基线测量和4次测量。结果:使用IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen,德国)和Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Port,瑞士)测量48只眼睛,使用Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Wetzlar,德国)测量49只眼睛(共145只)。的重复性意味着权力(公里)之间的基线测量角膜高(0.049±0.008 D IOLMaster, 0.061±0.011 Pentacam妳和0.065±0.009伽利略G6)但显著变量在30年代和700年IOLMaster 2分钟(0.177±0.021 D p m 30年代从基线明显不同,2和5分钟Pentacam妳(0.215±0.041 D p结论:使用导致高可变性的keratometric测量设备。这应该在使用后考虑,并且在测量之前至少应该经过5分钟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信