Field-Ready Suction Solutions for Emergencies: The Battlefield Ready Innovative Suction Kit (BRISK)

IF 3 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Saketh R. Peri, Maria J. Londono, Rakib Hasan, Connor J. Evans, Robert A. De Lorenzo, R. Lyle Hood
{"title":"Field-Ready Suction Solutions for Emergencies: The Battlefield Ready Innovative Suction Kit (BRISK)","authors":"Saketh R. Peri,&nbsp;Maria J. Londono,&nbsp;Rakib Hasan,&nbsp;Connor J. Evans,&nbsp;Robert A. De Lorenzo,&nbsp;R. Lyle Hood","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03700-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Portable suction devices are crucial for emergency airway management. Commercially-available units are unsuitable for field use due to size and power needs. A light-weight and multi-orientation operable portable suction device, Battlefield Ready Innovative Suction Kit (BRISK) was developed. The design was informed by feedback from combat medics, paramedics, and EMTs.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>End-user engagement and feedback defined BRISK’s design. The fabricated prototype used a vacuum pump and hydrophobic syringe filters. Performance tests measured vacuum pressure, air and liquid (water and ISO vomit simulant) flow rates, volume of water suctioned in different orientations (upright, tilted, or inverted), and contamination prevention between BRISK, SSCOR Quickdraw, and Laerdal LCSU4.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The BRISK device—weighing 0.97 kg—demonstrated a maximum vacuum pressure of 570 ± 6 mmHg and an air flowrate of 5.20 L/min. Liquid flow rates (L/min) for BRISK, LCSU4, and SSCOR with water were 4.92 ± 0.2, 6.97 ± 0.1, and 5.37 ± 0.1, respectively. With ISO vomit simulant, the rates were 3.23 ± 0.2, 3.06 ± 0.4, and 2.23 ± 0.1. BRISK showed consistent performance across orientations (<i>p</i> = 0.081), while LCSU4 and SSCOR varied significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The BRISK’s cross-contamination between filters and the pump was 0.01%, which is far less than the  rated contamination level of 0.1% as described by ISO 10079-1.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BRISK is 30% lighter and achieves competitive vacuum pressures and liquid flow rates than comparable units currently in the market. It ensures effective evacuation of liquids in all orientations: upright, tilted, or inverted. These results demonstrate the BRISK has the potential to provide superior clinical performance in pre-hospital and first response scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":"53 6","pages":"1409 - 1422"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-025-03700-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Portable suction devices are crucial for emergency airway management. Commercially-available units are unsuitable for field use due to size and power needs. A light-weight and multi-orientation operable portable suction device, Battlefield Ready Innovative Suction Kit (BRISK) was developed. The design was informed by feedback from combat medics, paramedics, and EMTs.

Methods

End-user engagement and feedback defined BRISK’s design. The fabricated prototype used a vacuum pump and hydrophobic syringe filters. Performance tests measured vacuum pressure, air and liquid (water and ISO vomit simulant) flow rates, volume of water suctioned in different orientations (upright, tilted, or inverted), and contamination prevention between BRISK, SSCOR Quickdraw, and Laerdal LCSU4.

Results

The BRISK device—weighing 0.97 kg—demonstrated a maximum vacuum pressure of 570 ± 6 mmHg and an air flowrate of 5.20 L/min. Liquid flow rates (L/min) for BRISK, LCSU4, and SSCOR with water were 4.92 ± 0.2, 6.97 ± 0.1, and 5.37 ± 0.1, respectively. With ISO vomit simulant, the rates were 3.23 ± 0.2, 3.06 ± 0.4, and 2.23 ± 0.1. BRISK showed consistent performance across orientations (p = 0.081), while LCSU4 and SSCOR varied significantly (p < 0.0001). The BRISK’s cross-contamination between filters and the pump was 0.01%, which is far less than the  rated contamination level of 0.1% as described by ISO 10079-1.

Conclusion

BRISK is 30% lighter and achieves competitive vacuum pressures and liquid flow rates than comparable units currently in the market. It ensures effective evacuation of liquids in all orientations: upright, tilted, or inverted. These results demonstrate the BRISK has the potential to provide superior clinical performance in pre-hospital and first response scenarios.

战场准备吸入解决方案的紧急情况:战场准备创新吸入套件(轻快)。
简介:便携式吸痰装置是紧急气道管理的关键。由于尺寸和功率需求,商用单位不适合现场使用。研制了一种轻便、多方位可操作的便携式吸力装置——“战场准备创新吸力套件”(BRISK)。该设计是根据战斗医务人员、护理人员和急救人员的反馈进行的。方法:终端用户参与和反馈定义了BRISK的设计。制造的原型使用真空泵和疏水注射器过滤器。性能测试测量了BRISK、SSCOR Quickdraw和Laerdal LCSU4之间的真空压力、空气和液体(水和ISO呕吐模拟物)流速、不同方向(直立、倾斜或倒置)吸水量以及污染预防。结果:重量0.97 kg的BRISK设备最大真空压力为570±6 mmHg,空气流量为5.20 L/min。轻快、LCSU4和SSCOR加水后的液体流速(L/min)分别为4.92±0.2、6.97±0.1和5.37±0.1。使用ISO呕吐模拟剂时,呕吐率分别为3.23±0.2、3.06±0.4和2.23±0.1。在不同方向上,BRISK表现出一致的性能(p = 0.081),而LCSU4和SSCOR差异显著(p结论:与目前市场上的同类装置相比,BRISK重量轻30%,具有竞争力的真空压力和液体流量。它确保有效的疏散液体在所有方向:直立,倾斜,或倒置。这些结果表明,BRISK具有在院前和第一反应场景中提供卓越临床性能的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信