Gender affirming medical care access: The role of healthcare stereotype threat and social support in a national probability sample of transgender adults

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Madeline Smith-Johnson, Katherine Alexander
{"title":"Gender affirming medical care access: The role of healthcare stereotype threat and social support in a national probability sample of transgender adults","authors":"Madeline Smith-Johnson,&nbsp;Katherine Alexander","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transgender adults face persistent barriers to gender-affirming medical care (GAC)—medical interventions related to a person's gender expression. Extensive qualitative research suggests that accessing GAC is stressful partly because of anticipated stigma from providers and healthcare systems, but that social support from loved ones helps trans adults persist in seeking care. We know less about how anticipated stigma and social support relate to GAC access at the population level. This study utilizes a nationally representative sample of trans adults who want GAC (N = 204) from the U.S. Transgender Population Health Survey (2016–2018). We ask whether anticipated stigma in healthcare (operationalized as healthcare stereotype threat (HCST), or the worry a person has about being judged, mistreated, or stereotyped by providers because of their gender identity or sexual orientation) and perceived social support are associated with GAC utilization for trans adults. We find a significant positive relationship between GAC utilization and HCST, global social support, and significant other support. We also find a significant interaction between HCST and social support where greater HCST is only associated with greater GAC utilization at high levels of social support. These findings underscore the importance of social relationships like peer advocates and chosen families in supporting necessary medical care for trans adults who want it and the importance of increasing culturally competent care in healthcare settings for gender-diverse people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 118014"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transgender adults face persistent barriers to gender-affirming medical care (GAC)—medical interventions related to a person's gender expression. Extensive qualitative research suggests that accessing GAC is stressful partly because of anticipated stigma from providers and healthcare systems, but that social support from loved ones helps trans adults persist in seeking care. We know less about how anticipated stigma and social support relate to GAC access at the population level. This study utilizes a nationally representative sample of trans adults who want GAC (N = 204) from the U.S. Transgender Population Health Survey (2016–2018). We ask whether anticipated stigma in healthcare (operationalized as healthcare stereotype threat (HCST), or the worry a person has about being judged, mistreated, or stereotyped by providers because of their gender identity or sexual orientation) and perceived social support are associated with GAC utilization for trans adults. We find a significant positive relationship between GAC utilization and HCST, global social support, and significant other support. We also find a significant interaction between HCST and social support where greater HCST is only associated with greater GAC utilization at high levels of social support. These findings underscore the importance of social relationships like peer advocates and chosen families in supporting necessary medical care for trans adults who want it and the importance of increasing culturally competent care in healthcare settings for gender-diverse people.
变性成年人在获得性别确认医疗护理(GAC)--与个人性别表达相关的医疗干预--方面一直面临障碍。广泛的定性研究表明,获得 GAC 会带来压力,部分原因是预期会受到医疗服务提供者和医疗保健系统的鄙视,但来自亲人的社会支持有助于变性成年人坚持寻求护理。我们对预期的污名化和社会支持如何在人口层面上与获取 GAC 的关系知之甚少。本研究利用了美国变性人口健康调查(2016-2018 年)中具有全国代表性的想要获得 GAC 的变性成人样本(N = 204)。我们询问变性成人在医疗保健中的预期污名化(可操作为医疗保健刻板印象威胁(HCST),或一个人因其性别认同或性取向而担心被医疗服务提供者评判、虐待或刻板印象)和感知到的社会支持是否与 GAC 的使用相关。我们发现,GAC 使用率与 HCST、全球社会支持和其他重要支持之间存在明显的正相关关系。我们还发现,HCST 和社会支持之间存在明显的交互作用,只有在社会支持水平较高的情况下,HCST 越高,GAC 的使用率才越高。这些发现强调了社会关系的重要性,如同侪倡导者和所选择的家庭在支持希望获得必要医疗护理的变性成年人方面的重要性,以及在医疗保健环境中为性别多元化人群提供更多文化适宜护理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信