Aligning the management of nature-based solutions to locally led adaptation principles: A case study of sand dams in Makueni County, Kenya

Judith Mulwa , Eric Kioko , Marie Ladekjaer Gravesen
{"title":"Aligning the management of nature-based solutions to locally led adaptation principles: A case study of sand dams in Makueni County, Kenya","authors":"Judith Mulwa ,&nbsp;Eric Kioko ,&nbsp;Marie Ladekjaer Gravesen","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advocates of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have argued that the approaches are important for addressing the various social and environmental challenges, including adaptation to climate change and biodiversity conservation. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has developed eight criteria for identification of Nature-based Solutions: (1) address societal challenges (2) entail landscape scale of intervention (3) biodiversity gain (4) economic viability (5) governance capability (6) equitably balance trade-offs (7) adaptive management, and (8) mainstreamed within an appropriate jurisdictional context. Nevertheless, studies have shown that interventions that seek to help people in the frontlines of climate change often fail to provide predictable financing, enable local ownership, and align to the actual conditions of the local communities. To address these challenges, in 2018 more than 20 countries formed a global commission on adaptation, which in 2021 adopted eight guidelines known as Locally Led Adaptation (LLA) principles to guide climate change adaptation efforts by ensuring that local communities are empowered to lead the design, implementation, and decision-making processes for adaptation projects. While NbS offer substantial co-benefits—enhancing biodiversity, supporting livelihoods, and improving water security—their success hinges on effective financing, governance, and local engagement. Sand dams, in particular, have been implemented for decades across arid and semi-arid regions, offering a reliable method of water harvesting and climate adaptation. However, their integration into NbS frameworks and LLA principles remains underexplored. As such, this study sets out to assess how one of the sub-national governments of Kenya (Makueni County) has aligned its implementation of Nature-based Solutions to the principles of LLA. The NbS under consideration is the county's sand dam project, which was instituted to address water scarcity in the face of climate change and inadvertently disaster risk management. To gauge the NbS project's alignment to LLA principles, 43 indicators and measurement metrics were developed based on the eight principles of LLA. Each principle has between 4 and 7 qualitative indicators. Data was collected through focus group discussions with sand dams’ projects’ committee members, key informant interviews with county and national government officials responsible for water and climate change, and analysis of the sand dams’ projects documents. Each indicator was assigned a score of 1 if present and 0 if absent, giving a potential of 43 positive scores or 100 % if the county government scored 1 for all the 43 indicators. From indicators assessed, the County Government had a positive score in about 53 %, slightly above average (50 %). It is the view of the authors’ that if better governance structures are pegged to the remaining LLA principles, then financing can flow more naturally to the water sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411525000151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advocates of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have argued that the approaches are important for addressing the various social and environmental challenges, including adaptation to climate change and biodiversity conservation. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has developed eight criteria for identification of Nature-based Solutions: (1) address societal challenges (2) entail landscape scale of intervention (3) biodiversity gain (4) economic viability (5) governance capability (6) equitably balance trade-offs (7) adaptive management, and (8) mainstreamed within an appropriate jurisdictional context. Nevertheless, studies have shown that interventions that seek to help people in the frontlines of climate change often fail to provide predictable financing, enable local ownership, and align to the actual conditions of the local communities. To address these challenges, in 2018 more than 20 countries formed a global commission on adaptation, which in 2021 adopted eight guidelines known as Locally Led Adaptation (LLA) principles to guide climate change adaptation efforts by ensuring that local communities are empowered to lead the design, implementation, and decision-making processes for adaptation projects. While NbS offer substantial co-benefits—enhancing biodiversity, supporting livelihoods, and improving water security—their success hinges on effective financing, governance, and local engagement. Sand dams, in particular, have been implemented for decades across arid and semi-arid regions, offering a reliable method of water harvesting and climate adaptation. However, their integration into NbS frameworks and LLA principles remains underexplored. As such, this study sets out to assess how one of the sub-national governments of Kenya (Makueni County) has aligned its implementation of Nature-based Solutions to the principles of LLA. The NbS under consideration is the county's sand dam project, which was instituted to address water scarcity in the face of climate change and inadvertently disaster risk management. To gauge the NbS project's alignment to LLA principles, 43 indicators and measurement metrics were developed based on the eight principles of LLA. Each principle has between 4 and 7 qualitative indicators. Data was collected through focus group discussions with sand dams’ projects’ committee members, key informant interviews with county and national government officials responsible for water and climate change, and analysis of the sand dams’ projects documents. Each indicator was assigned a score of 1 if present and 0 if absent, giving a potential of 43 positive scores or 100 % if the county government scored 1 for all the 43 indicators. From indicators assessed, the County Government had a positive score in about 53 %, slightly above average (50 %). It is the view of the authors’ that if better governance structures are pegged to the remaining LLA principles, then financing can flow more naturally to the water sector.
将基于自然的解决方案的管理与地方主导的适应原则相结合:肯尼亚Makueni县沙坝案例研究
基于自然的解决方案(NbS)的倡导者认为,这些方法对于解决各种社会和环境挑战非常重要,包括适应气候变化和保护生物多样性。国际自然保护联盟(IUCN)为确定基于自然的解决方案制定了8个标准:(1)应对社会挑战(2)干预的景观规模(3)生物多样性增益(4)经济可行性(5)治理能力(6)公平平衡权衡(7)适应性管理,以及(8)在适当的管辖范围内主流化。然而,研究表明,旨在帮助处于气候变化前沿的人们的干预措施往往无法提供可预测的资金,无法使当地拥有所有权,也无法与当地社区的实际情况保持一致。为了应对这些挑战,2018年,20多个国家成立了一个全球适应委员会,该委员会于2021年通过了八项指导方针,即“地方主导的适应”原则,通过确保地方社区有权领导适应项目的设计、实施和决策过程,来指导气候变化适应工作。虽然国家银行提供了巨大的共同利益——增强生物多样性、支持生计和改善水安全——但它们的成功取决于有效的融资、治理和地方参与。特别是沙坝,已经在干旱和半干旱地区实施了几十年,提供了一种可靠的集水和适应气候的方法。然而,它们与NbS框架和LLA原则的整合仍未得到充分探索。因此,本研究着手评估肯尼亚的一个地方政府(Makueni县)如何将其基于自然的解决方案的实施与LLA原则相一致。正在考虑的国家基准是该县的沙坝项目,该项目是为了应对气候变化和无意中灾害风险管理带来的水资源短缺而设立的。为了衡量国家统计局项目与LLA原则的一致性,基于LLA的八项原则制定了43个指标和测量指标。每个原则都有4到7个定性指标。通过与沙坝项目委员会成员的焦点小组讨论,对负责水和气候变化的县和国家政府官员的关键信息提供者的访谈,以及对沙坝项目文件的分析,收集了数据。每个指标如果有,就打1分,如果没有,就打0分。43个指标全部得到1分,就可能得到43分。从评估的指标来看,县政府的正面得分约为53%,略高于平均水平(50%)。这组作者认为,如果更好的治理结构与剩余的LLA原则挂钩,那么资金就可以更自然地流向水务部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信