Anne Wambui Mumbi , Sara Arancibia , Daniel May , Helen Pittson , Karl Behrendt , Adeboye Akindoyin Awomuti , Frank Vriesekoop
{"title":"Exploring consumer acceptance of grass-derived proteins in the UK: A structural equation modelling approach","authors":"Anne Wambui Mumbi , Sara Arancibia , Daniel May , Helen Pittson , Karl Behrendt , Adeboye Akindoyin Awomuti , Frank Vriesekoop","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grass-derived proteins, as a novel and sustainable source of nutrition, offer potential solutions for food security and environmental sustainability but face challenges in consumer adoption. This study investigates the factors influencing consumer acceptance and intentions to consume grass-derived proteins in the United Kingdom using a Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) approach to capture the complex relationships among psychological, social, and product-related variables. Data were collected via a cross-sectional survey of 990 participants, capturing attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, facilitators and food neophobia. The findings reveal that facilitators such as perceived health benefits, nutritional value, and safety significantly enhance consumer willingness to adopt grass-derived ingredients. Further, negative attitudes reduce positive attitudes towards meat preferences which in turn leads to positive intentions to consume grass-derived proteins. A multigroup analysis of the meat avoiders-reducers and regular meat consumers reveals different pathways influencing their behavioural intentions. Facilitators emerge as the strongest predictors of intention for both groups, but differences in the strength of pathways underscore the need for tailored marketing and policy interventions. For avoiders-reducers, direct pathways from facilitators to intention dominate, while indirect pathways involving attitudes towards meat hold minimal influence.</div><div>Conversely, meat consumers exhibit stronger resistance tied to cultural perceptions of grass-derived products. These findings suggest emphasizing strategies to enhance consumer familiarity and address sensory concerns while leveraging the environmental and health benefits of grass-derived proteins. By addressing group-specific drivers and barriers, these efforts can foster broader acceptance of sustainable food innovations, contributing to global goals for food security and environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105527"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Grass-derived proteins, as a novel and sustainable source of nutrition, offer potential solutions for food security and environmental sustainability but face challenges in consumer adoption. This study investigates the factors influencing consumer acceptance and intentions to consume grass-derived proteins in the United Kingdom using a Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) approach to capture the complex relationships among psychological, social, and product-related variables. Data were collected via a cross-sectional survey of 990 participants, capturing attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, facilitators and food neophobia. The findings reveal that facilitators such as perceived health benefits, nutritional value, and safety significantly enhance consumer willingness to adopt grass-derived ingredients. Further, negative attitudes reduce positive attitudes towards meat preferences which in turn leads to positive intentions to consume grass-derived proteins. A multigroup analysis of the meat avoiders-reducers and regular meat consumers reveals different pathways influencing their behavioural intentions. Facilitators emerge as the strongest predictors of intention for both groups, but differences in the strength of pathways underscore the need for tailored marketing and policy interventions. For avoiders-reducers, direct pathways from facilitators to intention dominate, while indirect pathways involving attitudes towards meat hold minimal influence.
Conversely, meat consumers exhibit stronger resistance tied to cultural perceptions of grass-derived products. These findings suggest emphasizing strategies to enhance consumer familiarity and address sensory concerns while leveraging the environmental and health benefits of grass-derived proteins. By addressing group-specific drivers and barriers, these efforts can foster broader acceptance of sustainable food innovations, contributing to global goals for food security and environmental sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.