The differential impact of bilingualism on stuttering severity, language-specific patterns, and therapy outcomes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Amir Hossein Rasoli Jokar , Sadaf Salehi , Kiana Tanghatar , Ladan KhoshbinSarokalaee
{"title":"The differential impact of bilingualism on stuttering severity, language-specific patterns, and therapy outcomes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Amir Hossein Rasoli Jokar ,&nbsp;Sadaf Salehi ,&nbsp;Kiana Tanghatar ,&nbsp;Ladan KhoshbinSarokalaee","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate (1) if bilingual children differ from monolingual peers in stuttering severity, (2) if severity varies between their first (L1) and second (L2) languages, and (3) how bilingualism affects treatment outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-six empirical studies were analyzed after a comprehensive search and screening. Random-effects models compared stuttering severity between bilingual and monolingual children, assessed L1 versus L2 differences, and evaluated fluency post-treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Bilingual children showed significantly greater stuttering severity than monolingual peers, likely due to heightened cognitive and speech motor demands of managing two languages. Severity was higher in L2 than L1, reflecting proficiency and dominance effects. Treatment outcomes revealed substantial fluency improvements in bilingual children, comparable to monolingual results. However, inconsistent bilingualism definitions and severity measures limited comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Bilingualism increases stuttering severity, particularly in L2, but does not impair treatment success. Comprehensive bilingual assessments and culturally responsive interventions are essential. Future research should use longitudinal designs, diverse language pairs, and standardized criteria to improve clinical practices for bilingual children who stutter.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587625001016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate (1) if bilingual children differ from monolingual peers in stuttering severity, (2) if severity varies between their first (L1) and second (L2) languages, and (3) how bilingualism affects treatment outcomes.

Methods

Twenty-six empirical studies were analyzed after a comprehensive search and screening. Random-effects models compared stuttering severity between bilingual and monolingual children, assessed L1 versus L2 differences, and evaluated fluency post-treatment.

Results

Bilingual children showed significantly greater stuttering severity than monolingual peers, likely due to heightened cognitive and speech motor demands of managing two languages. Severity was higher in L2 than L1, reflecting proficiency and dominance effects. Treatment outcomes revealed substantial fluency improvements in bilingual children, comparable to monolingual results. However, inconsistent bilingualism definitions and severity measures limited comparisons.

Conclusion

Bilingualism increases stuttering severity, particularly in L2, but does not impair treatment success. Comprehensive bilingual assessments and culturally responsive interventions are essential. Future research should use longitudinal designs, diverse language pairs, and standardized criteria to improve clinical practices for bilingual children who stutter.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信