Uncertainty Quantification of Microblock-Based Resource Models and Sequencing of Sampling

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Glen T. Nwaila, Emmanuel John M. Carranza
{"title":"Uncertainty Quantification of Microblock-Based Resource Models and Sequencing of Sampling","authors":"Glen T. Nwaila, Emmanuel John M. Carranza","doi":"10.1007/s11053-025-10485-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spatial models are fundamental across the mineral value chain, forming the basis for exploration and extraction. Geodata science and increasingly bigger data permit alternatives to traditional mineral resource estimation methods, particularly in spatial data interpolation. Interpolation has been formulated as a machine learning (ML) task, providing new capabilities, such as automated deployment and remote real-time monitoring. However, a significant gap exists regarding how uncertainty propagates through ML workflows. This paper introduces an uncertainty propagation method to a ML-based interpolation method called microblocking that propagates epistemic uncertainty. Our method adheres to the data science framework and is fully ML-based. Epistemic uncertainty is the dominant uncertainty in geosciences, because data sparsity is created by both complex dynamics of physical systems and sampling limitations. Our uncertainty estimates are block-specific and can guide sampling and other activities. Biasing sampling toward blocks with high economic potential and high uncertainty enables the most cost-effective sequencing of sampling. A rapid, ML-based uncertainty quantification method provides a modern data-driven (feedback-based) framework to extraction guidance, built on big data, geodata science, and real-time mineral resource modeling. We compare our method with typical kriging uncertainty estimates and demonstrates that our results are more block-specific and broader in scope (more comprehensive). In an industry where financial stakes are significant, a thorough understanding of uncertainty can improve investor confidence. The method not only improves scientific rigor, but is also engineered to fit increasingly bigger data across the mineral value chain, and caters to the conservative nature of the mineral industry, where method validation occurs at a slower pace.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-025-10485-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spatial models are fundamental across the mineral value chain, forming the basis for exploration and extraction. Geodata science and increasingly bigger data permit alternatives to traditional mineral resource estimation methods, particularly in spatial data interpolation. Interpolation has been formulated as a machine learning (ML) task, providing new capabilities, such as automated deployment and remote real-time monitoring. However, a significant gap exists regarding how uncertainty propagates through ML workflows. This paper introduces an uncertainty propagation method to a ML-based interpolation method called microblocking that propagates epistemic uncertainty. Our method adheres to the data science framework and is fully ML-based. Epistemic uncertainty is the dominant uncertainty in geosciences, because data sparsity is created by both complex dynamics of physical systems and sampling limitations. Our uncertainty estimates are block-specific and can guide sampling and other activities. Biasing sampling toward blocks with high economic potential and high uncertainty enables the most cost-effective sequencing of sampling. A rapid, ML-based uncertainty quantification method provides a modern data-driven (feedback-based) framework to extraction guidance, built on big data, geodata science, and real-time mineral resource modeling. We compare our method with typical kriging uncertainty estimates and demonstrates that our results are more block-specific and broader in scope (more comprehensive). In an industry where financial stakes are significant, a thorough understanding of uncertainty can improve investor confidence. The method not only improves scientific rigor, but is also engineered to fit increasingly bigger data across the mineral value chain, and caters to the conservative nature of the mineral industry, where method validation occurs at a slower pace.

Graphical Abstract

基于微块的资源模型不确定度量化与采样排序
空间模型是整个矿产价值链的基础,是勘探和开采的基础。地球数据科学和越来越大的数据允许替代传统的矿产资源估计方法,特别是在空间数据插值方面。插值已经被制定为一项机器学习(ML)任务,提供了新的功能,如自动部署和远程实时监控。然而,关于不确定性如何在ML工作流中传播,存在一个显著的差距。本文将不确定性传播方法引入到基于机器学习的微块插值方法中,微块插值方法传播认知不确定性。我们的方法遵循数据科学框架,完全基于ml。认知不确定性是地球科学中主要的不确定性,因为数据稀疏性是由物理系统的复杂动态和采样限制造成的。我们的不确定性估计是特定于块的,可以指导抽样和其他活动。将采样偏向于具有高经济潜力和高不确定性的区块,可以实现最具成本效益的采样排序。基于ml的快速不确定性量化方法为大数据、地球数据科学和实时矿产资源建模提供了现代数据驱动(基于反馈)的提取指导框架。我们将我们的方法与典型的克里格不确定性估计进行了比较,并证明我们的结果更具块特异性,范围更广(更全面)。在一个金融风险很大的行业,对不确定性的透彻理解可以提高投资者的信心。该方法不仅提高了科学的严谨性,而且还设计用于适应整个矿物价值链中越来越大的数据,并且迎合了矿物行业的保守性质,其中方法验证发生的速度较慢。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信