Uncertainty Quantification of Microblock-Based Resource Models and Sequencing of Sampling

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Glen T. Nwaila, Emmanuel John M. Carranza
{"title":"Uncertainty Quantification of Microblock-Based Resource Models and Sequencing of Sampling","authors":"Glen T. Nwaila, Emmanuel John M. Carranza","doi":"10.1007/s11053-025-10485-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spatial models are fundamental across the mineral value chain, forming the basis for exploration and extraction. Geodata science and increasingly bigger data permit alternatives to traditional mineral resource estimation methods, particularly in spatial data interpolation. Interpolation has been formulated as a machine learning (ML) task, providing new capabilities, such as automated deployment and remote real-time monitoring. However, a significant gap exists regarding how uncertainty propagates through ML workflows. This paper introduces an uncertainty propagation method to a ML-based interpolation method called microblocking that propagates epistemic uncertainty. Our method adheres to the data science framework and is fully ML-based. Epistemic uncertainty is the dominant uncertainty in geosciences, because data sparsity is created by both complex dynamics of physical systems and sampling limitations. Our uncertainty estimates are block-specific and can guide sampling and other activities. Biasing sampling toward blocks with high economic potential and high uncertainty enables the most cost-effective sequencing of sampling. A rapid, ML-based uncertainty quantification method provides a modern data-driven (feedback-based) framework to extraction guidance, built on big data, geodata science, and real-time mineral resource modeling. We compare our method with typical kriging uncertainty estimates and demonstrates that our results are more block-specific and broader in scope (more comprehensive). In an industry where financial stakes are significant, a thorough understanding of uncertainty can improve investor confidence. The method not only improves scientific rigor, but is also engineered to fit increasingly bigger data across the mineral value chain, and caters to the conservative nature of the mineral industry, where method validation occurs at a slower pace.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-025-10485-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spatial models are fundamental across the mineral value chain, forming the basis for exploration and extraction. Geodata science and increasingly bigger data permit alternatives to traditional mineral resource estimation methods, particularly in spatial data interpolation. Interpolation has been formulated as a machine learning (ML) task, providing new capabilities, such as automated deployment and remote real-time monitoring. However, a significant gap exists regarding how uncertainty propagates through ML workflows. This paper introduces an uncertainty propagation method to a ML-based interpolation method called microblocking that propagates epistemic uncertainty. Our method adheres to the data science framework and is fully ML-based. Epistemic uncertainty is the dominant uncertainty in geosciences, because data sparsity is created by both complex dynamics of physical systems and sampling limitations. Our uncertainty estimates are block-specific and can guide sampling and other activities. Biasing sampling toward blocks with high economic potential and high uncertainty enables the most cost-effective sequencing of sampling. A rapid, ML-based uncertainty quantification method provides a modern data-driven (feedback-based) framework to extraction guidance, built on big data, geodata science, and real-time mineral resource modeling. We compare our method with typical kriging uncertainty estimates and demonstrates that our results are more block-specific and broader in scope (more comprehensive). In an industry where financial stakes are significant, a thorough understanding of uncertainty can improve investor confidence. The method not only improves scientific rigor, but is also engineered to fit increasingly bigger data across the mineral value chain, and caters to the conservative nature of the mineral industry, where method validation occurs at a slower pace.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信