Who stays and who plays? Participant retention and smartphone app usage in a longitudinal travel survey

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Stephen P. Greaves, Alec Cobbold, Oliver Stanesby, Melanie J. Sharman, Kim Jose, Jack Evans, Verity Cleland
{"title":"Who stays and who plays? Participant retention and smartphone app usage in a longitudinal travel survey","authors":"Stephen P. Greaves, Alec Cobbold, Oliver Stanesby, Melanie J. Sharman, Kim Jose, Jack Evans, Verity Cleland","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10608-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Longitudinal studies have become increasingly popular for investigating changes in behaviour, but present additional challenges around participant recruitment, retention, engagement with survey tasks, additional burden and ultimately data quality. Personal technologies, particularly smartphones, have become integral to tackling these challenges but come with their own caveats around user acceptance and engagement. The current paper investigates these issues in the context of a longitudinal study of interventions designed to encourage use of public transport and increase associated physical activity in Tasmania, Australia. The study comprised multiple waves of data collection over a seven-month period in which travel data were collected using a smartphone app supplemented with user experience surveys. Attrition is lower for older participants, those engaging with the app more, and those responding to the research/environmental/health messaging of the survey as well as the potential for financial gain. App usage is lower among older participants while app engagement is stronger for males, those recording less travel and those indicating environmental reasons as a motivator for completing the study. Experiences with the app are mixed, participants report positive sentiments about the ease of use, hedonic motivation, and help in recalling travel; however, concerns are raised over the accuracy of trip recording, the associated burden of correcting trips, and reductions in smartphone battery-life. Despite the unplanned coincidence with the COVID-19 restrictions, outcomes provide important guidance around recruitment, retention and post-hoc analysis of results from longitudinal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10608-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Longitudinal studies have become increasingly popular for investigating changes in behaviour, but present additional challenges around participant recruitment, retention, engagement with survey tasks, additional burden and ultimately data quality. Personal technologies, particularly smartphones, have become integral to tackling these challenges but come with their own caveats around user acceptance and engagement. The current paper investigates these issues in the context of a longitudinal study of interventions designed to encourage use of public transport and increase associated physical activity in Tasmania, Australia. The study comprised multiple waves of data collection over a seven-month period in which travel data were collected using a smartphone app supplemented with user experience surveys. Attrition is lower for older participants, those engaging with the app more, and those responding to the research/environmental/health messaging of the survey as well as the potential for financial gain. App usage is lower among older participants while app engagement is stronger for males, those recording less travel and those indicating environmental reasons as a motivator for completing the study. Experiences with the app are mixed, participants report positive sentiments about the ease of use, hedonic motivation, and help in recalling travel; however, concerns are raised over the accuracy of trip recording, the associated burden of correcting trips, and reductions in smartphone battery-life. Despite the unplanned coincidence with the COVID-19 restrictions, outcomes provide important guidance around recruitment, retention and post-hoc analysis of results from longitudinal studies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信