Stephen P. Greaves, Alec Cobbold, Oliver Stanesby, Melanie J. Sharman, Kim Jose, Jack Evans, Verity Cleland
{"title":"Who stays and who plays? Participant retention and smartphone app usage in a longitudinal travel survey","authors":"Stephen P. Greaves, Alec Cobbold, Oliver Stanesby, Melanie J. Sharman, Kim Jose, Jack Evans, Verity Cleland","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10608-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Longitudinal studies have become increasingly popular for investigating changes in behaviour, but present additional challenges around participant recruitment, retention, engagement with survey tasks, additional burden and ultimately data quality. Personal technologies, particularly smartphones, have become integral to tackling these challenges but come with their own caveats around user acceptance and engagement. The current paper investigates these issues in the context of a longitudinal study of interventions designed to encourage use of public transport and increase associated physical activity in Tasmania, Australia. The study comprised multiple waves of data collection over a seven-month period in which travel data were collected using a smartphone app supplemented with user experience surveys. Attrition is lower for older participants, those engaging with the app more, and those responding to the research/environmental/health messaging of the survey as well as the potential for financial gain. App usage is lower among older participants while app engagement is stronger for males, those recording less travel and those indicating environmental reasons as a motivator for completing the study. Experiences with the app are mixed, participants report positive sentiments about the ease of use, hedonic motivation, and help in recalling travel; however, concerns are raised over the accuracy of trip recording, the associated burden of correcting trips, and reductions in smartphone battery-life. Despite the unplanned coincidence with the COVID-19 restrictions, outcomes provide important guidance around recruitment, retention and post-hoc analysis of results from longitudinal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10608-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Longitudinal studies have become increasingly popular for investigating changes in behaviour, but present additional challenges around participant recruitment, retention, engagement with survey tasks, additional burden and ultimately data quality. Personal technologies, particularly smartphones, have become integral to tackling these challenges but come with their own caveats around user acceptance and engagement. The current paper investigates these issues in the context of a longitudinal study of interventions designed to encourage use of public transport and increase associated physical activity in Tasmania, Australia. The study comprised multiple waves of data collection over a seven-month period in which travel data were collected using a smartphone app supplemented with user experience surveys. Attrition is lower for older participants, those engaging with the app more, and those responding to the research/environmental/health messaging of the survey as well as the potential for financial gain. App usage is lower among older participants while app engagement is stronger for males, those recording less travel and those indicating environmental reasons as a motivator for completing the study. Experiences with the app are mixed, participants report positive sentiments about the ease of use, hedonic motivation, and help in recalling travel; however, concerns are raised over the accuracy of trip recording, the associated burden of correcting trips, and reductions in smartphone battery-life. Despite the unplanned coincidence with the COVID-19 restrictions, outcomes provide important guidance around recruitment, retention and post-hoc analysis of results from longitudinal studies.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.