Effectiveness of multiple mnemonic strategies for improving verbal memory in older adults.

Yu-Ruei Lin, Yu-Hsiang Cheng, Dai-Wei Lin, Yu-Chen Chuang, Hsiu-Ling Huang, Yann-Ying Hsiao, Chieh-Ning Huang, Ting-Jung Hsu, Jong-Ling Fuh
{"title":"Effectiveness of multiple mnemonic strategies for improving verbal memory in older adults.","authors":"Yu-Ruei Lin, Yu-Hsiang Cheng, Dai-Wei Lin, Yu-Chen Chuang, Hsiu-Ling Huang, Yann-Ying Hsiao, Chieh-Ning Huang, Ting-Jung Hsu, Jong-Ling Fuh","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive training is an evidence-based intervention for preserving memory in older adults. The effectiveness of cognitive training varies, depending on the approach used. This study examined the efficiency of cognitive training using multiple mnemonic strategies in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adopted a pretest-posttest control-group design, with all participants undergoing two neuropsychological assessments. The cognitive training program consisted of four 60-minute sessions over a month. In the interventions, participants practiced the mnemonic strategies of elaboration and self-reference. The effect of cognitive training was analyzed using both dependent and independent t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ages were 69.7 ± 12.0 for the control group (n= 23) and 70.7 ± 5.6 for the intervention group (n= 27), with educational attainment of 11.9 ± 3.2 and 12.1 ± 3.9 years, respectively. Both groups showed an overall improvement in memory tests, but only the intervention group's learning and delayed recall aspects of the verbal memory test remained statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (p < 0.00625).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that multiple-mnemonic strategy-based cognitive training effectively enhances memory function in older adults and should be regarded as an alternative intervention for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive training is an evidence-based intervention for preserving memory in older adults. The effectiveness of cognitive training varies, depending on the approach used. This study examined the efficiency of cognitive training using multiple mnemonic strategies in older adults.

Methods: This study adopted a pretest-posttest control-group design, with all participants undergoing two neuropsychological assessments. The cognitive training program consisted of four 60-minute sessions over a month. In the interventions, participants practiced the mnemonic strategies of elaboration and self-reference. The effect of cognitive training was analyzed using both dependent and independent t-tests.

Results: The mean ages were 69.7 ± 12.0 for the control group (n= 23) and 70.7 ± 5.6 for the intervention group (n= 27), with educational attainment of 11.9 ± 3.2 and 12.1 ± 3.9 years, respectively. Both groups showed an overall improvement in memory tests, but only the intervention group's learning and delayed recall aspects of the verbal memory test remained statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (p < 0.00625).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that multiple-mnemonic strategy-based cognitive training effectively enhances memory function in older adults and should be regarded as an alternative intervention for older adults.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信