Decision trees for estimating osteological sex from the skull using an expanded suite of morphological traits

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Morgan J. Ferrell, John J. Schultz, Donovan M. Adams PhD
{"title":"Decision trees for estimating osteological sex from the skull using an expanded suite of morphological traits","authors":"Morgan J. Ferrell,&nbsp;John J. Schultz,&nbsp;Donovan M. Adams PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Osteological sex estimation utilizing morphological traits of the skull primarily focuses on a set of five traits. Developing new models with an expanded suite of traits has the potential to increase sex classification accuracies and improve the classification of partial and fragmentary remains. Thus, this study seeks to improve classification accuracies for osteological sex estimation from the skull by assessing an expanded suite of traits and generating multiple decision tree classification models. Twenty-one traits were evaluated for a sample of 403 adult males and females. Krippendorff's alpha was used to assess intraobserver error, and aligned rank transformation was used to examine the effects of sex, age, population, and secular change on the traits. Prior to generating the decision trees, the data were randomly split into 80% model training samples and 20% holdout validation testing samples to test the predictive accuracy of each tree. The trees were generated for traits from the skull, cranium, and mandible. Separate trees were also generated for African Americans and European Americans, as well as for the pooled population sample. Overall, the recommended decision trees for the skull and cranium achieved higher accuracies (91.0%–100%) than models generated for the mandible (75.8%–85.0%). Additionally, the recommended pooled population (81.3%–97.3%) decision trees achieved similar accuracies compared with the African American (75.8%–94.0%) and European American (85.0%–100%) trees. Further, the trees generated in this study achieved improved classification accuracies for the skull compared with the current five-trait method by incorporating an expanded suite of traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"70 3","pages":"835-853"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osteological sex estimation utilizing morphological traits of the skull primarily focuses on a set of five traits. Developing new models with an expanded suite of traits has the potential to increase sex classification accuracies and improve the classification of partial and fragmentary remains. Thus, this study seeks to improve classification accuracies for osteological sex estimation from the skull by assessing an expanded suite of traits and generating multiple decision tree classification models. Twenty-one traits were evaluated for a sample of 403 adult males and females. Krippendorff's alpha was used to assess intraobserver error, and aligned rank transformation was used to examine the effects of sex, age, population, and secular change on the traits. Prior to generating the decision trees, the data were randomly split into 80% model training samples and 20% holdout validation testing samples to test the predictive accuracy of each tree. The trees were generated for traits from the skull, cranium, and mandible. Separate trees were also generated for African Americans and European Americans, as well as for the pooled population sample. Overall, the recommended decision trees for the skull and cranium achieved higher accuracies (91.0%–100%) than models generated for the mandible (75.8%–85.0%). Additionally, the recommended pooled population (81.3%–97.3%) decision trees achieved similar accuracies compared with the African American (75.8%–94.0%) and European American (85.0%–100%) trees. Further, the trees generated in this study achieved improved classification accuracies for the skull compared with the current five-trait method by incorporating an expanded suite of traits.

利用一套扩展的形态学特征估计颅骨骨性别的决策树。
利用颅骨形态学特征的骨性别估计主要集中在一组五个特征上。开发具有扩展特征套件的新模型有可能提高性别分类的准确性,并改善部分和碎片遗骸的分类。因此,本研究旨在通过评估一套扩展的特征和生成多个决策树分类模型来提高颅骨骨性别估计的分类准确性。对403名成年男性和女性样本进行了21项性状评价。Krippendorff's alpha用于评估观察者内误差,对齐等级变换用于检查性别、年龄、人口和长期变化对性状的影响。在生成决策树之前,将数据随机分成80%的模型训练样本和20%的持牌验证测试样本,以测试每棵树的预测准确性。这些树是根据头骨、头盖骨和下颌骨的特征生成的。此外,还为非洲裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人以及汇总的人口样本生成了单独的树。总体而言,推荐的颅骨和头盖骨决策树的准确率(91.0%-100%)高于下颌骨模型(75.8%-85.0%)。此外,与非裔美国人(75.8%-94.0%)和欧裔美国人(85.0%-100%)的决策树相比,推荐的汇总人口决策树(81.3%-97.3%)的准确率相似。此外,与目前的五特征方法相比,本研究中生成的树通过纳入扩展的特征集,提高了头骨的分类精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of forensic sciences
Journal of forensic sciences 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信