Predictability of Central Corneal Stromal Thickness Reduction in InnovEyes Ablation Profile: a Retrospective Study.

Shimin Tan, Yimeng Fan, Xindi Wang, Yu Zhang, Yunpeng Li, Xiaojuan Fan, Zhao Liu, Shengjian Mi, Qianyan Kang
{"title":"Predictability of Central Corneal Stromal Thickness Reduction in InnovEyes Ablation Profile: a Retrospective Study.","authors":"Shimin Tan, Yimeng Fan, Xindi Wang, Yu Zhang, Yunpeng Li, Xiaojuan Fan, Zhao Liu, Shengjian Mi, Qianyan Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the predictability of the central corneal stromal thickness (CST) reduction in InnovEyes ablation profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study included 118 eyes (61 patients) who underwent surgeries based on InnovEyes profile and 117 eyes (67 patients) based on the Custom-Q. The central CST, the central corneal thickness (CT) and the central corneal epithelial thickness (CET) were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) preoperatively and postoperatively over 3 months. The planned-achieved thickness (PAD) was calculated. Planned and achieved central CST, PAD and increase of central CET were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The achieved central CST reduction was 113.60 ± 21.88 μm in the InnovEyes group, which was not significantly different from the planned (108.70 ± 19.87 μm, P = 0.075). There was a strong correlation between the achieved central CST reduction and the planned reduction in the InnovEyes group (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.884, P < 0.001), which was stronger than in the Custom-Q group (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.861, P < 0.001). The PAD of central CST reduction was -4.87 ± 8.17 μm and -4.76 ± 9.75 μm for the InnovEyes and Custom-Q groups, respectively (P = 0.966). The increase of central CET was 3.29 ± 3.97 μm in InnovEyes group and 4.39 ± 4.84 μm in Custom-Q group, with no significant difference (P = 0.064).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The InnovEyes ablation profile demonstrates good predictability of the central CST reduction, ensuring the safety of this novel profile. Besides, the InnovEyes profile may have taken postoperative corneal epithelial remodeling into consideration, and provided an enhanced pre-compensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94170,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","volume":" ","pages":"104570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predictability of the central corneal stromal thickness (CST) reduction in InnovEyes ablation profile.

Methods: The retrospective study included 118 eyes (61 patients) who underwent surgeries based on InnovEyes profile and 117 eyes (67 patients) based on the Custom-Q. The central CST, the central corneal thickness (CT) and the central corneal epithelial thickness (CET) were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) preoperatively and postoperatively over 3 months. The planned-achieved thickness (PAD) was calculated. Planned and achieved central CST, PAD and increase of central CET were compared.

Results: The achieved central CST reduction was 113.60 ± 21.88 μm in the InnovEyes group, which was not significantly different from the planned (108.70 ± 19.87 μm, P = 0.075). There was a strong correlation between the achieved central CST reduction and the planned reduction in the InnovEyes group (R2 = 0.884, P < 0.001), which was stronger than in the Custom-Q group (R2 = 0.861, P < 0.001). The PAD of central CST reduction was -4.87 ± 8.17 μm and -4.76 ± 9.75 μm for the InnovEyes and Custom-Q groups, respectively (P = 0.966). The increase of central CET was 3.29 ± 3.97 μm in InnovEyes group and 4.39 ± 4.84 μm in Custom-Q group, with no significant difference (P = 0.064).

Conclusions: The InnovEyes ablation profile demonstrates good predictability of the central CST reduction, ensuring the safety of this novel profile. Besides, the InnovEyes profile may have taken postoperative corneal epithelial remodeling into consideration, and provided an enhanced pre-compensation.

InnovEyes 消融轮廓中角膜中央基质厚度降低的可预测性:一项回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信