Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone Vs Combined With Topical Timolol-Dorzolamide or Dorzolamide for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-03-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S509136
Rahaf A Hubayni, Jumanah Qedair, Ziad M Bukhari, Ali S Alsudais, Orjwan Salah Badghaish, Razan Osama Bawazir, Abdullah S AlQahtani, Hashem Almarzouki
{"title":"Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone Vs Combined With Topical Timolol-Dorzolamide or Dorzolamide for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rahaf A Hubayni, Jumanah Qedair, Ziad M Bukhari, Ali S Alsudais, Orjwan Salah Badghaish, Razan Osama Bawazir, Abdullah S AlQahtani, Hashem Almarzouki","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S509136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision loss in diabetes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with topical timolol-dorzolamide versus dorzolamide alone in DME patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted across multiple databases until March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IVB (1.25 mg, monthly) with topical dorzolamide-timolol (twice daily) or dorzolamide alone (twice daily) were included. Primary outcomes assessed were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at various intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs involving 98 patients (150 eyes) were analyzed, with a mean age of 57.9 years and a female predominance (55.1%). The subgroup meta-analysis indicated a weighted mean difference (WMD) in BCVA of -0.125 [95% CI: -0.21 to -0.041]. The IVB+D group showed no significant difference in WMD compared to the IVB and IVB+TD groups. IOP measurements revealed a WMD of -1.244 mmHg [95% CI: -2.548 mmHg to 0.06 mmHg], with a significant increase in the IVB group compared to the IVB+D and IVB+TD groups. CMT analysis showed a WMD of -78.875 μm [95% CI: -118.606 μm to -39.145 μm], with no significant differences among groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent IVB with topical timolol-dorzolamide or dorzolamide alone demonstrated similar efficacy in improving BCVA and CMT in DME patients. However, the IVB+TD combination resulted in a more significant reduction in IOP compared to IVB alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"1007-1019"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S509136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision loss in diabetes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with topical timolol-dorzolamide versus dorzolamide alone in DME patients.

Patients and methods: A literature search was conducted across multiple databases until March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IVB (1.25 mg, monthly) with topical dorzolamide-timolol (twice daily) or dorzolamide alone (twice daily) were included. Primary outcomes assessed were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at various intervals.

Results: Four RCTs involving 98 patients (150 eyes) were analyzed, with a mean age of 57.9 years and a female predominance (55.1%). The subgroup meta-analysis indicated a weighted mean difference (WMD) in BCVA of -0.125 [95% CI: -0.21 to -0.041]. The IVB+D group showed no significant difference in WMD compared to the IVB and IVB+TD groups. IOP measurements revealed a WMD of -1.244 mmHg [95% CI: -2.548 mmHg to 0.06 mmHg], with a significant increase in the IVB group compared to the IVB+D and IVB+TD groups. CMT analysis showed a WMD of -78.875 μm [95% CI: -118.606 μm to -39.145 μm], with no significant differences among groups.

Conclusion: Concurrent IVB with topical timolol-dorzolamide or dorzolamide alone demonstrated similar efficacy in improving BCVA and CMT in DME patients. However, the IVB+TD combination resulted in a more significant reduction in IOP compared to IVB alone.

目的:糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)是导致糖尿病患者视力下降的主要原因。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估玻璃体内贝伐单抗(IVB)联合外用噻吗洛尔-多佐胺与单用多佐胺治疗 DME 患者的疗效和安全性:在 2024 年 3 月之前,在多个数据库中进行了文献检索。纳入了比较 IVB(1.25 毫克,每月一次)与局部使用多佐胺-噻吗洛尔(每天两次)或单独使用多佐胺(每天两次)的随机对照试验(RCT)。评估的主要结果是最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑中心厚度(CMT)和不同时间间隔的眼压(IOP):结果:共分析了四项研究,涉及 98 名患者(150 只眼),平均年龄为 57.9 岁,女性占多数(55.1%)。亚组荟萃分析显示,BCVA的加权平均差(WMD)为-0.125 [95% CI:-0.21至-0.041]。与 IVB 组和 IVB+TD 组相比,IVB+D 组的 WMD 无明显差异。眼压测量显示的WMD为-1.244毫米汞柱[95% CI:-2.548毫米汞柱至0.06毫米汞柱],与IVB+D组和IVB+TD组相比,IVB组的WMD显著增加。CMT分析显示WMD为-78.875 μm [95% CI:-118.606 μm至-39.145 μm],各组间无显著差异:结论:同时使用IVB和局部噻吗洛尔-多佐胺或单独使用多佐胺对改善DME患者的BCVA和CMT具有相似的疗效。然而,与单独使用 IVB 相比,IVB+TD 组合能更显著地降低眼压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信