Investigating the relationship between aerobic fitness and lower-limb resistance vessel function before and after a bout of uninterrupted sitting.

Sophie E Rayner, Haoxuan Liu, Jennifer L Petterson, Myles W O'Brien, Derek S Kimmerly
{"title":"Investigating the relationship between aerobic fitness and lower-limb resistance vessel function before and after a bout of uninterrupted sitting.","authors":"Sophie E Rayner, Haoxuan Liu, Jennifer L Petterson, Myles W O'Brien, Derek S Kimmerly","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prolonged sitting reduces lower-limb resistance vessel function (RVF), whereas increasing aerobic fitness levels enhance lower-limb RVF. However, it is unknown if having higher aerobic fitness offers protection against prolonged sitting-induced declines in RVF. This study investigated the relationships between aerobic fitness versus reductions in lower-limb RVF following a 3-hour bout of uninterrupted sitting. In 30 healthy young to middle aged adults (19♀, 24±6 years), aerobic fitness was assessed during a graded, maximal cycling test. Relative peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) was determined via indirect calorimetry [37.5±8.6 (24.7-60.7 mlO2/kg/min]. Popliteal blood flow (PBF) was recorded via duplex ultrasonography. Lower-limb RVF was assessed in the seated posture and quantified as the peak PBF and area under the curve (PBFAUC, first minute of hyperemia) responses to 5-min of distal cuff-induced ischemia. The lower-limb RVF assessment was performed before and after a sitting. Peak PBF decreased following sitting (473±254 to 387±199 mL/min, P=0.024), while PBFAUC remained unchanged (6145±3063 versus 6446±3826 mL, P=0.758). Relative V̇O2peak was not associated with Pre-Sitting Peak PBF (R=0.236, P=0.210) or PBFAUC (R=-0.026, P=0.889). Furthermore, relative V̇O2peak was also not associated with sitting-induced reductions in Peak PBF (R=-0.145, P=0.444). The reductions in Peak PBF following sitting support previous work demonstrating that prolonged uninterrupted sitting negatively impacts lower-limb RVF. In contrast, prolonged sitting did not alter the PBFAUC response, suggesting that Peak PBF responses may provide a more sensitive index of sitting-induced declines in RVF. In young to middle-aged, healthy adults, aerobic fitness did not impact baseline or sitting-induced reductions in lower-limb RVF.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prolonged sitting reduces lower-limb resistance vessel function (RVF), whereas increasing aerobic fitness levels enhance lower-limb RVF. However, it is unknown if having higher aerobic fitness offers protection against prolonged sitting-induced declines in RVF. This study investigated the relationships between aerobic fitness versus reductions in lower-limb RVF following a 3-hour bout of uninterrupted sitting. In 30 healthy young to middle aged adults (19♀, 24±6 years), aerobic fitness was assessed during a graded, maximal cycling test. Relative peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) was determined via indirect calorimetry [37.5±8.6 (24.7-60.7 mlO2/kg/min]. Popliteal blood flow (PBF) was recorded via duplex ultrasonography. Lower-limb RVF was assessed in the seated posture and quantified as the peak PBF and area under the curve (PBFAUC, first minute of hyperemia) responses to 5-min of distal cuff-induced ischemia. The lower-limb RVF assessment was performed before and after a sitting. Peak PBF decreased following sitting (473±254 to 387±199 mL/min, P=0.024), while PBFAUC remained unchanged (6145±3063 versus 6446±3826 mL, P=0.758). Relative V̇O2peak was not associated with Pre-Sitting Peak PBF (R=0.236, P=0.210) or PBFAUC (R=-0.026, P=0.889). Furthermore, relative V̇O2peak was also not associated with sitting-induced reductions in Peak PBF (R=-0.145, P=0.444). The reductions in Peak PBF following sitting support previous work demonstrating that prolonged uninterrupted sitting negatively impacts lower-limb RVF. In contrast, prolonged sitting did not alter the PBFAUC response, suggesting that Peak PBF responses may provide a more sensitive index of sitting-induced declines in RVF. In young to middle-aged, healthy adults, aerobic fitness did not impact baseline or sitting-induced reductions in lower-limb RVF.

研究不间断久坐前后有氧适能与下肢血管阻力功能的关系。
长时间坐着会降低下肢阻力血管功能(RVF),而增加有氧健身水平会增强下肢RVF。然而,尚不清楚是否有较高的有氧适应性提供保护,以防止长时间坐着引起的裂谷热下降。本研究调查了3小时不间断坐着后有氧适能与下肢裂谷热减少之间的关系。在30名健康的中青年(19♀,24±6岁)中,通过分级最大循环试验评估有氧适能。间接量热法测定相对峰值耗氧量(V o 2峰)[37.5±8.6 (24.7-60.7 mlO2/kg/min]。双工超声记录腘窝血流(PBF)。在坐姿下评估下肢RVF,并量化为对远端袖带诱导的5分钟缺血的峰值PBF和曲线下面积(pfauc,第一分钟充血)反应。下肢裂谷热评估分别在坐位前后进行。坐位后PBF峰值下降(473±254至387±199 mL/min, P=0.024),而pbauc保持不变(6145±3063对6446±3826 mL, P=0.758)。相对V / o2峰与坐位前PBF峰(R=0.236, P=0.210)和pbauc (R=-0.026, P=0.889)无相关性。此外,相对V o 2峰值也与坐着引起的PBF峰值降低无关(R=-0.145, P=0.444)。久坐后PBF峰值的降低支持了先前的研究,证明长时间不间断的久坐会对下肢裂谷热产生负面影响。相比之下,长时间坐着并没有改变pbfac反应,这表明PBF峰值反应可能提供了一个更敏感的指数,可以反映坐着引起的裂谷热下降。在年轻到中年的健康成年人中,有氧健身对基线或静坐引起的下肢裂谷热的减少没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信