How Healthy Are Our Students Really? Lifestyle-Related Health Risk Behaviour Patterns in Student Athletes and Nonathlete Students.

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tsm2/1994649
Gabriella Florence, Melissa Janse van Vuren, Wayne Derman, Jake Popperwell, Liske Kotzé-Hörstmann
{"title":"How Healthy Are Our Students Really? Lifestyle-Related Health Risk Behaviour Patterns in Student Athletes and Nonathlete Students.","authors":"Gabriella Florence, Melissa Janse van Vuren, Wayne Derman, Jake Popperwell, Liske Kotzé-Hörstmann","doi":"10.1155/tsm2/1994649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Students engage in one or more lifestyle-related risk behaviours that may predispose them to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Whilst student athletes (St-A) are often perceived as having healthier lifestyles compared to nonathlete students (NAS), it is unclear whether they exhibit better risk profiles. This study compares the prevalence and clustering of these lifestyle-related risk behaviours among NAS and St-A at a South African university. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, inadequate fruit and vegetable intake and physical inactivity using a screening questionnaire. Differences between gender and athletic status were analysed using chi-square tests. Cluster analysis was employed to identify patterns of co-occurring risk behaviours within the combined cohort. <b>Results:</b> One hundred and forty-five St-A (<i>n</i> = 91 male, <i>n</i> = 54 female) and 143 NAS (<i>n</i> = 90 male, <i>n</i> = 53 female) were included. Similar alcohol use patterns were observed between St-A and NAS (<i>p</i>=0.737), but females consumed less alcohol than men (<i>p</i>=0.025). Smoking was less prevalent among St-A (18.6% vs. 32.2% NAS, <i>p</i>=0.020). Less than 10% of participants met fruit and vegetable intake recommendations, with females consuming more than males (<i>p</i>=0.002). St-A met the moderate activity guidelines more often (73.0% vs. 44.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the vigorous physical activity guidelines more often (71.5% vs. 37.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than NAS. The cluster analysis identified a higher risk group (34.6% St-A) with multiple risk behaviours, and a healthier group (all meeting vigorous activity goals and none smoking). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both St-A and NAS engage in lifestyle-related risk behaviours. Further investigation into the interconnections of these behaviours and the implementation of university-based interventions is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1994649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tsm2/1994649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Students engage in one or more lifestyle-related risk behaviours that may predispose them to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Whilst student athletes (St-A) are often perceived as having healthier lifestyles compared to nonathlete students (NAS), it is unclear whether they exhibit better risk profiles. This study compares the prevalence and clustering of these lifestyle-related risk behaviours among NAS and St-A at a South African university. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, inadequate fruit and vegetable intake and physical inactivity using a screening questionnaire. Differences between gender and athletic status were analysed using chi-square tests. Cluster analysis was employed to identify patterns of co-occurring risk behaviours within the combined cohort. Results: One hundred and forty-five St-A (n = 91 male, n = 54 female) and 143 NAS (n = 90 male, n = 53 female) were included. Similar alcohol use patterns were observed between St-A and NAS (p=0.737), but females consumed less alcohol than men (p=0.025). Smoking was less prevalent among St-A (18.6% vs. 32.2% NAS, p=0.020). Less than 10% of participants met fruit and vegetable intake recommendations, with females consuming more than males (p=0.002). St-A met the moderate activity guidelines more often (73.0% vs. 44.3%, p < 0.001) and the vigorous physical activity guidelines more often (71.5% vs. 37.1%, p < 0.001) than NAS. The cluster analysis identified a higher risk group (34.6% St-A) with multiple risk behaviours, and a healthier group (all meeting vigorous activity goals and none smoking). Conclusions: Both St-A and NAS engage in lifestyle-related risk behaviours. Further investigation into the interconnections of these behaviours and the implementation of university-based interventions is warranted.

我们的学生到底有多健康?学生运动员与非运动员学生生活方式相关的健康风险行为模式。
学生从事一种或多种与生活方式相关的风险行为,可能使他们易患非传染性疾病(NCDs)。虽然学生运动员(St-A)通常被认为比非运动员学生(NAS)有更健康的生活方式,但目前尚不清楚他们是否表现出更好的风险状况。本研究比较了南非一所大学NAS和St-A之间这些与生活方式相关的风险行为的患病率和聚集性。方法:这项横断面研究使用筛选问卷评估了饮酒、吸烟、水果和蔬菜摄入不足以及缺乏身体活动的流行程度。使用卡方检验分析性别和运动状态之间的差异。采用聚类分析来确定合并队列中共同发生的危险行为模式。结果:纳入St-A 145例(男91例,女54例),NAS 143例(男90例,女53例)。在St-A和NAS之间观察到相似的酒精使用模式(p=0.737),但女性饮酒量少于男性(p=0.025)。St-A组吸烟较少(18.6% vs. 32.2%, p=0.020)。不到10%的参与者符合水果和蔬菜摄入量建议,女性比男性摄入更多(p=0.002)。St-A组比NAS组更符合适度运动指南(73.0%比44.3%,p < 0.001),更符合剧烈运动指南(71.5%比37.1%,p < 0.001)。聚类分析确定了具有多种危险行为的高风险组(34.6% St-A)和更健康组(均达到剧烈运动目标且不吸烟)。结论:St-A和NAS均参与与生活方式相关的危险行为。进一步调查这些行为之间的相互联系以及实施基于大学的干预措施是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信