Comparing personality dysfunction, maladaptive personality traits, and borderline personality disorder as models of emotion dysregulation in three adult samples.

Isabella A Manuel, Gabrielle S Ilagan, Ashley L Greene, Christopher C Conway
{"title":"Comparing personality dysfunction, maladaptive personality traits, and borderline personality disorder as models of emotion dysregulation in three adult samples.","authors":"Isabella A Manuel, Gabrielle S Ilagan, Ashley L Greene, Christopher C Conway","doi":"10.1037/per0000730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The categorical borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis identifies people who struggle to manage negative emotions. As the field transitions to dimensional personality disorder (PD) models, it is important to know whether alternative diagnostic constructs capture emotion regulation difficulties to the same degree. If not, it may make sense to modify the dimensional models or else retain the BPD syndrome to preserve its incremental utility for clinical description, treatment planning, and prognosis. In three adult samples (total <i>N</i> = 1,197), we modeled self-rated emotion dysregulation as a function of <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition <i>(DSM-5</i>) Alternative Model of Personality Disorder dimensions and traditional BPD features. We found that personality dysfunction had bivariate correlations with emotion dysregulation of .70-.80 across samples, almost identical to those observed for BPD. Combined, personality dysfunction and maladaptive personality traits explained 52%-73% of individual differences in emotion dysregulation. Controlling for Alternative Model of Personality Disorder constructs, a standalone measure of BPD features accounted for an additional 7%, 0.6%, and 1% of emotion-dysregulation variation across samples. We conclude that emotion dysregulation is better conceptualized as a general feature of the PD space, rather than a specific deficit in borderline or any other PD. We encourage additional investigation into ways that dimensional models of personality pathology relate to emotion dysregulation. The study's raw data and analysis code are available at https://osf.io/x9jbs/. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The categorical borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis identifies people who struggle to manage negative emotions. As the field transitions to dimensional personality disorder (PD) models, it is important to know whether alternative diagnostic constructs capture emotion regulation difficulties to the same degree. If not, it may make sense to modify the dimensional models or else retain the BPD syndrome to preserve its incremental utility for clinical description, treatment planning, and prognosis. In three adult samples (total N = 1,197), we modeled self-rated emotion dysregulation as a function of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) Alternative Model of Personality Disorder dimensions and traditional BPD features. We found that personality dysfunction had bivariate correlations with emotion dysregulation of .70-.80 across samples, almost identical to those observed for BPD. Combined, personality dysfunction and maladaptive personality traits explained 52%-73% of individual differences in emotion dysregulation. Controlling for Alternative Model of Personality Disorder constructs, a standalone measure of BPD features accounted for an additional 7%, 0.6%, and 1% of emotion-dysregulation variation across samples. We conclude that emotion dysregulation is better conceptualized as a general feature of the PD space, rather than a specific deficit in borderline or any other PD. We encourage additional investigation into ways that dimensional models of personality pathology relate to emotion dysregulation. The study's raw data and analysis code are available at https://osf.io/x9jbs/. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

比较三个成人样本中人格功能障碍、适应不良人格特征和边缘型人格障碍作为情绪失调模型的影响。
分类边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的诊断是指那些努力控制负面情绪的人。随着该领域向维度人格障碍(PD)模型的过渡,了解其他诊断结构是否在相同程度上捕获情绪调节困难是很重要的。如果没有,修改维度模型或保留BPD综合征是有意义的,以保留其在临床描述、治疗计划和预后方面的增量效用。在三个成人样本中(总N = 1197),我们将自评情绪失调作为《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)人格障碍替代模型维度和传统BPD特征的函数进行建模。我们发现人格功能障碍与情绪失调具有0.70 -的双变量相关。80个样本,几乎与BPD观察到的相同。人格功能障碍和适应不良人格特征共同解释了52%-73%的情绪失调个体差异。控制人格障碍结构的替代模型,BPD特征的独立测量分别占样本中情绪失调差异的7%,0.6%和1%。我们得出的结论是,情绪失调最好被概念化为PD空间的一般特征,而不是边缘型或任何其他PD的特定缺陷。我们鼓励进一步研究人格病理学的维度模型与情绪失调的关系。该研究的原始数据和分析代码可在https://osf.io/x9jbs/上获得。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信