Pesticides and public health: discussing risks in Brazilian agro-industrial growth.

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2025.1442801
Juliana E Perobelli
{"title":"Pesticides and public health: discussing risks in Brazilian agro-industrial growth.","authors":"Juliana E Perobelli","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2025.1442801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The benefits of pesticides in enhancing agricultural yields are widely accepted by the general public. However, it is essential to address the limitations of the current agricultural model to develop more sustainable practices that prioritize environmental and human health. Brazil, a major global agricultural player, ranks among the top five agro-food producers and exporters, making it one of the largest consumers of pesticides worldwide. Notably, approximately 30% of pesticides used in Brazil are banned in the European Union. Paradoxically, some of these banned agrochemicals re-enter Northern markets through imported agro-food products. Addressing the regulatory disparities between Northern and Southern countries necessitates global initiatives and research to better understand the real biological risks associated with pesticide exposure, particularly concerning reproductive health, endocrine disruption, and carcinogenesis-key targets of these chemicals. Since 2001, the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) has operated the \"Reports on Pesticide Residue Analysis in Food (RPRAF)\" program to evaluate pesticide residues in food samples collected across Brazil. Despite its limitations, the program has been crucial in identifying the chemical exposome related to Brazilian agro-foods, facilitating studies on relevant pesticides, their doses, routes, and exposure schedules, and enabling the development of pre-clinical studies based on real-life exposure scenarios. A thorough understanding of the main mechanism of toxicity is crucial for raising awareness about the health risks associated with pesticide exposure, fostering tailored health strategies and guiding informed regulatory policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1442801"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1442801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The benefits of pesticides in enhancing agricultural yields are widely accepted by the general public. However, it is essential to address the limitations of the current agricultural model to develop more sustainable practices that prioritize environmental and human health. Brazil, a major global agricultural player, ranks among the top five agro-food producers and exporters, making it one of the largest consumers of pesticides worldwide. Notably, approximately 30% of pesticides used in Brazil are banned in the European Union. Paradoxically, some of these banned agrochemicals re-enter Northern markets through imported agro-food products. Addressing the regulatory disparities between Northern and Southern countries necessitates global initiatives and research to better understand the real biological risks associated with pesticide exposure, particularly concerning reproductive health, endocrine disruption, and carcinogenesis-key targets of these chemicals. Since 2001, the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) has operated the "Reports on Pesticide Residue Analysis in Food (RPRAF)" program to evaluate pesticide residues in food samples collected across Brazil. Despite its limitations, the program has been crucial in identifying the chemical exposome related to Brazilian agro-foods, facilitating studies on relevant pesticides, their doses, routes, and exposure schedules, and enabling the development of pre-clinical studies based on real-life exposure scenarios. A thorough understanding of the main mechanism of toxicity is crucial for raising awareness about the health risks associated with pesticide exposure, fostering tailored health strategies and guiding informed regulatory policies.

农药与公众健康:讨论巴西农业工业增长中的风险。
农药在提高农业产量方面的好处已被公众广泛接受。然而,必须解决当前农业模式的局限性,发展更加可持续的做法,优先考虑环境和人类健康。巴西是全球主要的农业大国,是五大农产品生产国和出口国之一,也是全球最大的农药消费国之一。值得注意的是,巴西使用的农药中约有30%在欧盟被禁止使用。矛盾的是,其中一些被禁止的农用化学品通过进口农产品重新进入北方市场。要解决北方和南方国家之间的监管差异,就必须开展全球倡议和研究,以便更好地了解与农药接触有关的真正生物风险,特别是与这些化学品的主要目标生殖健康、内分泌干扰和致癌性有关的风险。自2001年以来,巴西卫生监管机构(ANVISA)开展了“食品中农药残留分析报告(RPRAF)”计划,以评估巴西各地收集的食品样品中的农药残留。尽管存在局限性,但该项目在确定与巴西农业食品有关的化学物质暴露、促进对相关农药及其剂量、途径和暴露时间表的研究以及基于实际暴露情况开展临床前研究方面发挥了至关重要的作用。全面了解毒性的主要机制对于提高对与农药接触有关的健康风险的认识、促进有针对性的健康战略和指导知情的监管政策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信