Deep culturing the fecal microbiota of healthy laying hens.

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Zhixuan Feng, Natalia Lorenc, Bridget O'Brien, Guangwen Sun, Zhiwei Li, Dongyun Jung, Jennifer Ronholm
{"title":"Deep culturing the fecal microbiota of healthy laying hens.","authors":"Zhixuan Feng, Natalia Lorenc, Bridget O'Brien, Guangwen Sun, Zhiwei Li, Dongyun Jung, Jennifer Ronholm","doi":"10.1186/s42523-025-00395-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The microbiota is implicated in several aspects of livestock health and disease. Understanding the structure and function of the poultry microbiota would be a valuable tool for improving their health and productivity since the microbiota can likely be optimized for metrics that are important to the industry such as improved feed conversion ratio, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and higher levels of competitive exclusion against pathogens. Most research into understanding the poultry microbiota has relied on culture-independent methods; however, the pure culture of bacteria is essential to elucidating the roles of individual bacteria in the microbiota and developing novel probiotic products for poultry production.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we have used a deep culturing approach consisting of 76 culture conditions to generate a culture collection of 1,240 bacterial isolates from healthy chickens. We then compared the taxonomy of cultured isolates to the taxonomic results of metagenomic sequencing to estimate what proportion of the microbiota was cultured. Metagenomic sequencing detected DNA from 545 bacterial species while deep culturing was able to produce isolates for 128 bacterial species. Some bacterial families, such as Comamonadaceae and Neisseriaceae were only detected via culturing - indicating that metagenomic analysis may not provide a complete taxonomic census of the microbiota. To further examine sub-species diversity in the poultry bacteriome, we whole genome sequenced 114 Escherichia coli isolates from 6 fecal samples and observed a great deal of diversity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep culturing and metagenomic sequencing approaches to examine the diversity of the microbiota within an individual will yield different results. In this project we generated a culture collection of enteric bacteria from healthy laying hens that can be used to further understand the role of specific commensals within the broader microbiota context and have made this collection available to the community. Isolates from this collection can be requested by contacting the corresponding author and will be provided at cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":"7 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00395-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The microbiota is implicated in several aspects of livestock health and disease. Understanding the structure and function of the poultry microbiota would be a valuable tool for improving their health and productivity since the microbiota can likely be optimized for metrics that are important to the industry such as improved feed conversion ratio, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and higher levels of competitive exclusion against pathogens. Most research into understanding the poultry microbiota has relied on culture-independent methods; however, the pure culture of bacteria is essential to elucidating the roles of individual bacteria in the microbiota and developing novel probiotic products for poultry production.

Results: In this study, we have used a deep culturing approach consisting of 76 culture conditions to generate a culture collection of 1,240 bacterial isolates from healthy chickens. We then compared the taxonomy of cultured isolates to the taxonomic results of metagenomic sequencing to estimate what proportion of the microbiota was cultured. Metagenomic sequencing detected DNA from 545 bacterial species while deep culturing was able to produce isolates for 128 bacterial species. Some bacterial families, such as Comamonadaceae and Neisseriaceae were only detected via culturing - indicating that metagenomic analysis may not provide a complete taxonomic census of the microbiota. To further examine sub-species diversity in the poultry bacteriome, we whole genome sequenced 114 Escherichia coli isolates from 6 fecal samples and observed a great deal of diversity.

Conclusions: Deep culturing and metagenomic sequencing approaches to examine the diversity of the microbiota within an individual will yield different results. In this project we generated a culture collection of enteric bacteria from healthy laying hens that can be used to further understand the role of specific commensals within the broader microbiota context and have made this collection available to the community. Isolates from this collection can be requested by contacting the corresponding author and will be provided at cost.

健康蛋鸡粪便微生物群的深度培养。
背景:微生物群与家畜健康和疾病的几个方面有关。了解家禽微生物群的结构和功能将是改善其健康和生产力的有价值的工具,因为微生物群可以优化对行业重要的指标,如提高饲料转化率,降低温室气体排放,提高对病原体的竞争排斥水平。大多数了解家禽微生物群的研究都依赖于与培养无关的方法;然而,细菌的纯培养对于阐明微生物群中单个细菌的作用和开发用于家禽生产的新型益生菌产品至关重要。结果:在这项研究中,我们使用了一种由76种培养条件组成的深度培养方法,从健康的鸡中分离出1,240株细菌。然后,我们将培养的分离株的分类与宏基因组测序的分类结果进行比较,以估计培养的微生物群的比例。宏基因组测序检测到545种细菌的DNA,而深层培养能够分离出128种细菌。一些细菌科,如Comamonadaceae和neisseraceae只能通过培养检测到,这表明宏基因组分析可能无法提供微生物群的完整分类普查。为了进一步研究家禽细菌组的亚种多样性,我们对来自6份粪便样本的114株大肠杆菌进行了全基因组测序,并观察到大量的多样性。结论:深层培养和宏基因组测序方法检查个体内微生物群的多样性将产生不同的结果。在这个项目中,我们收集了健康蛋鸡的肠道细菌,可用于进一步了解特定共生体在更广泛的微生物群背景下的作用,并将该收集提供给社区。可通过与通讯作者联系索取该集合中的隔离物,并将按成本价提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信