Vehicle collision risk assessment method in highway work zone based on trajectory data.

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wenyun Tang, Hanbin Wang, Jianxiao Ma, Chenyang Yang, Chaoying Yin
{"title":"Vehicle collision risk assessment method in highway work zone based on trajectory data.","authors":"Wenyun Tang, Hanbin Wang, Jianxiao Ma, Chenyang Yang, Chaoying Yin","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2474722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate vehicle safety in highway work zones by analyzing collision risk using vehicle trajectory data collected from these zones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, vehicle movement within the work zone is monitored using UAV technology, and vehicle trajectory data along with traffic flow characteristics are extracted using Tracker software. Next, a risk assessment method is proposed that comprehensively evaluates both the likelihood and severity of vehicle collisions in the work zone. Finally, the distribution patterns, spatial variations, and influencing factors of collision risk within the work zone are analyzed in detail.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis reveals that the collision risk for lane-changing vehicles predominantly falls within the range of 0.3 to 0.5, higher than that of straight-moving vehicles, which is concentrated between 0.2 and 0.4. This highlights the elevated risk associated with lane-changing behavior. Similarly, the mean collision risk for vehicles in the warning area, transition area, and buffer space are 0.155, 0.207, and 0.252, respectively, showing a progressive increase in risk across these areas. Further analysis shows that the correlation coefficients of speed, speed difference, and acceleration difference with vehicle collision risk are 0.026, 0.305, and 0.698, respectively, indicating a significant positive correlation. Conversely, the correlation coefficient of displacement difference with vehicle collision risk is -0.281, demonstrating a significant negative correlation, which is significant at the 0.01 level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The methodology employed provides a detailed quantification of collision likelihood and severity, offering a comprehensive analysis of vehicle collision risks in work zones and their spatial distribution characteristics. It also explores the relationship between these risks and vehicle motion parameters. The findings offer a scientific basis for identifying high-risk areas and formulating targeted safety improvement measures. Furthermore, the study provides crucial technical support and decision-making guidance for enhancing traffic safety in highway work zones.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2474722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate vehicle safety in highway work zones by analyzing collision risk using vehicle trajectory data collected from these zones.

Methods: First, vehicle movement within the work zone is monitored using UAV technology, and vehicle trajectory data along with traffic flow characteristics are extracted using Tracker software. Next, a risk assessment method is proposed that comprehensively evaluates both the likelihood and severity of vehicle collisions in the work zone. Finally, the distribution patterns, spatial variations, and influencing factors of collision risk within the work zone are analyzed in detail.

Results: The analysis reveals that the collision risk for lane-changing vehicles predominantly falls within the range of 0.3 to 0.5, higher than that of straight-moving vehicles, which is concentrated between 0.2 and 0.4. This highlights the elevated risk associated with lane-changing behavior. Similarly, the mean collision risk for vehicles in the warning area, transition area, and buffer space are 0.155, 0.207, and 0.252, respectively, showing a progressive increase in risk across these areas. Further analysis shows that the correlation coefficients of speed, speed difference, and acceleration difference with vehicle collision risk are 0.026, 0.305, and 0.698, respectively, indicating a significant positive correlation. Conversely, the correlation coefficient of displacement difference with vehicle collision risk is -0.281, demonstrating a significant negative correlation, which is significant at the 0.01 level.

Conclusions: The methodology employed provides a detailed quantification of collision likelihood and severity, offering a comprehensive analysis of vehicle collision risks in work zones and their spatial distribution characteristics. It also explores the relationship between these risks and vehicle motion parameters. The findings offer a scientific basis for identifying high-risk areas and formulating targeted safety improvement measures. Furthermore, the study provides crucial technical support and decision-making guidance for enhancing traffic safety in highway work zones.

基于轨迹数据的公路工区车辆碰撞风险评估方法。
目的:利用在公路工作区域收集的车辆轨迹数据,分析碰撞风险,评价公路工作区域的车辆安全性。方法:首先,利用无人机技术监控工作区内车辆的运动,利用Tracker软件提取车辆轨迹数据以及交通流特征;其次,提出了一种综合评价工作区内车辆碰撞可能性和严重程度的风险评估方法。最后,详细分析了工区内碰撞风险的分布格局、空间分异及影响因素。结果:分析表明,变道车辆的碰撞风险主要集中在0.3 ~ 0.5之间,而直线行驶车辆的碰撞风险则集中在0.2 ~ 0.4之间。这凸显了与变道行为相关的高风险。同样,在预警区、过渡区和缓冲区,车辆的平均碰撞风险分别为0.155、0.207和0.252,表明这些区域的风险逐渐增加。进一步分析可知,车速、车速差、加速度差与车辆碰撞风险的相关系数分别为0.026、0.305、0.698,呈显著正相关。相反,位移差与车辆碰撞风险的相关系数为-0.281,呈显著负相关,且在0.01水平上显著。结论:所采用的方法提供了碰撞可能性和严重程度的详细量化,提供了工作区车辆碰撞风险及其空间分布特征的综合分析。它还探讨了这些风险和车辆运动参数之间的关系。研究结果为识别高风险区域和制定有针对性的安全改进措施提供了科学依据。为提高公路工区交通安全水平提供了重要的技术支持和决策指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信