Ilya Bendich, Caleb Ford, Michele Christy, Ryan Nunley
{"title":"Travel Staff in Total Hip Arthroplasty is Associated with Increased Operating Room Costs and Decreased Efficiency.","authors":"Ilya Bendich, Caleb Ford, Michele Christy, Ryan Nunley","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a cost-effective procedure that benefits from operating room (OR) efficiencies supported by consistent staff. Travel staff (TS), including travel nurses, surgical scrub technologists (ST), and registered nurse first-assists (RNFA) have been increasingly utilized, potentially introducing surgical team inconsistencies. The purpose of this study was to report on the economic impact of travel staff in THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 947 primary THAs at a high-volume tertiary center (from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024) categorized procedures as manual posterior approach (PA), robotic arm-assisted (RA) PA, or direct anterior approach (DAA). Staff roles included ST, circulator (C), or RNFA, classified as TS or full-time (FT) staff. There were 13 TS-ST, 27 FT-ST, 15 TS-C, 25 FT-C, four TS-RNFA, and 20 FT-RNFA. The OR times and wasted supply costs (unused opened supplies) were tracked. The THAs with TS and FT staff were compared, adjusting for surgeon. The OR cost per minute was $46. The OR efficiency was also analyzed for cases utilizing orientee and relief staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Travel ST impacted OR times more than travel C or RNFA (P < 0.05). The TS-ST increased OR times across all THA subgroups: RA-THA (+25 minutes, P = 0.006), PA-THA (+12 minutes, P = 0.004), and DAA-THA (+eight minutes, P = 0.009). This equates to an increased cost of $1,150, $552, and $368 for each RA-THA, PA-THA, and DAA-THA, respectively, with TS-ST. Wasted supply costs increased by an average of $58 per case (P = 0.05) with TS-ST. Orientee and relief staffing in the OR was also found to increase OR times and supply costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Travel staff in THA is associated with inefficiency and increased cost, with TS-ST having the greatest impact. This study highlights the potential economic benefit of retaining consistent, permanent surgical teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a cost-effective procedure that benefits from operating room (OR) efficiencies supported by consistent staff. Travel staff (TS), including travel nurses, surgical scrub technologists (ST), and registered nurse first-assists (RNFA) have been increasingly utilized, potentially introducing surgical team inconsistencies. The purpose of this study was to report on the economic impact of travel staff in THA.
Methods: A retrospective review of 947 primary THAs at a high-volume tertiary center (from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024) categorized procedures as manual posterior approach (PA), robotic arm-assisted (RA) PA, or direct anterior approach (DAA). Staff roles included ST, circulator (C), or RNFA, classified as TS or full-time (FT) staff. There were 13 TS-ST, 27 FT-ST, 15 TS-C, 25 FT-C, four TS-RNFA, and 20 FT-RNFA. The OR times and wasted supply costs (unused opened supplies) were tracked. The THAs with TS and FT staff were compared, adjusting for surgeon. The OR cost per minute was $46. The OR efficiency was also analyzed for cases utilizing orientee and relief staff.
Results: Travel ST impacted OR times more than travel C or RNFA (P < 0.05). The TS-ST increased OR times across all THA subgroups: RA-THA (+25 minutes, P = 0.006), PA-THA (+12 minutes, P = 0.004), and DAA-THA (+eight minutes, P = 0.009). This equates to an increased cost of $1,150, $552, and $368 for each RA-THA, PA-THA, and DAA-THA, respectively, with TS-ST. Wasted supply costs increased by an average of $58 per case (P = 0.05) with TS-ST. Orientee and relief staffing in the OR was also found to increase OR times and supply costs.
Conclusion: Travel staff in THA is associated with inefficiency and increased cost, with TS-ST having the greatest impact. This study highlights the potential economic benefit of retaining consistent, permanent surgical teams.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.