Jacquelyn D Marsh, Bryn Zomar, Anthony Tannous, James Howard, Steven MacDonald, Brent Lanting
{"title":"Cost Analysis of Direct Anterior versus Direct Lateral Approach for Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Impact Cost?","authors":"Jacquelyn D Marsh, Bryn Zomar, Anthony Tannous, James Howard, Steven MacDonald, Brent Lanting","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective surgery for advanced osteoarthritis. The rising demand for THA and increasing wait times are having a substantial impact on healthcare resources, resulting in increased pressure to move to outpatient care. This has most commonly been enabled through a minimally invasive, direct anterior (DA) surgical approach; however, recently, the direct lateral (DL) approach has also been used in outpatient THA. The purpose of this study was to compare costs between outpatient THA using a DA compared to a DL approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial and a prospective cohort study. Participants undergoing primary THA using the DA approach were randomly assigned to be discharged on the same day as surgery (outpatient) or on day one post-surgery (inpatient). The cohort study included patients undergoing outpatient THA using the DL approach. We compared patients in the outpatient arm of the randomized trial to the prospective cohort of outpatient DL THAs. We recorded all costs associated with each surgical approach. Following discharge, participants also completed a self-reported cost diary regarding any resource utilization such as emergency department visits or subsequent hospitalizations, tests and procedures, consultations or follow-up, healthcare professional services, rehabilitation, medications, informal care, productivity losses, and out-of-pocket expenditures up to three months postoperative. There were 127 patients in the DA group and 51 patients in the DL group. The mean age of patients in the DA group was 66 years compared to 59 years in the DL group (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in costs between groups from either the healthcare payer (DA = 7,910.19, DL = 7,847.17, P = 0.80) or societal perspectives (DA = 14,657.21, DL = 14,581.21, P = 0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest similar overall mean costs over 90 days postoperative between outpatient THA using a DL or DA surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective surgery for advanced osteoarthritis. The rising demand for THA and increasing wait times are having a substantial impact on healthcare resources, resulting in increased pressure to move to outpatient care. This has most commonly been enabled through a minimally invasive, direct anterior (DA) surgical approach; however, recently, the direct lateral (DL) approach has also been used in outpatient THA. The purpose of this study was to compare costs between outpatient THA using a DA compared to a DL approach.
Methods: The present study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial and a prospective cohort study. Participants undergoing primary THA using the DA approach were randomly assigned to be discharged on the same day as surgery (outpatient) or on day one post-surgery (inpatient). The cohort study included patients undergoing outpatient THA using the DL approach. We compared patients in the outpatient arm of the randomized trial to the prospective cohort of outpatient DL THAs. We recorded all costs associated with each surgical approach. Following discharge, participants also completed a self-reported cost diary regarding any resource utilization such as emergency department visits or subsequent hospitalizations, tests and procedures, consultations or follow-up, healthcare professional services, rehabilitation, medications, informal care, productivity losses, and out-of-pocket expenditures up to three months postoperative. There were 127 patients in the DA group and 51 patients in the DL group. The mean age of patients in the DA group was 66 years compared to 59 years in the DL group (P < 0.01).
Results: There were no statistically significant differences in costs between groups from either the healthcare payer (DA = 7,910.19, DL = 7,847.17, P = 0.80) or societal perspectives (DA = 14,657.21, DL = 14,581.21, P = 0.96).
Conclusion: Our results suggest similar overall mean costs over 90 days postoperative between outpatient THA using a DL or DA surgical approach.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.