Effect of Air Exposure Time Under Room-Temperature Conditions on the Performance of Chemical Heat Blankets Intended for Use in Prehospital Accidental Hypothermia.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maren Helgø, Thea G Refsnes, Øyvind Thomassen, Sigurd Mydske
{"title":"Effect of Air Exposure Time Under Room-Temperature Conditions on the Performance of Chemical Heat Blankets Intended for Use in Prehospital Accidental Hypothermia.","authors":"Maren Helgø, Thea G Refsnes, Øyvind Thomassen, Sigurd Mydske","doi":"10.1177/10806032251325562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAccidental hypothermia increases mortality in patients with traumatic injury, making hypothermia management essential in prehospital trauma care. Chemical heat blankets are commonly used for this purpose. These blankets require time to get warm, with agitation often used to accelerate the exothermic reaction. Many search and rescue teams use chemical heat blankets, but optimal activation of the blankets remains uncertain. This study investigated how varying oxygen exposure durations affect the thermal performance of these blankets to guide their optimal use in search and rescue scenarios.MethodsIn room-temperature conditions, a full-body manikin was wrapped in a standardized hypothermia model, including a chemical heat blanket, and evaluated under 3 conditions: 1) no shaking, 2) shaking for 2 min, and 3) shaking for 15 min before wrapping. Thermometers were placed inside the heating panel pockets and secured in place with tape to ensure consistent measurements. Temperature data were collected over 6 h, and each scenario was performed 4 times.ResultsBlankets shaken for 2 min achieved higher initial temperatures than those not shaken, with a significant difference sustained for 88 min. Shaking for 15 min resulted in higher initial temperatures than 2-min shaking, with no long-term difference. All scenarios converged to the same temperature (36°C) after 6 h.ConclusionShaking the blanket for 2 min significantly improved early heating performance, whereas longer shaking offered minimal benefit. These findings suggest that short preparation time may be adequate in optimizing thermal delivery and reducing the time to treatment for patients with prehospital accidental hypothermia.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032251325562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251325562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAccidental hypothermia increases mortality in patients with traumatic injury, making hypothermia management essential in prehospital trauma care. Chemical heat blankets are commonly used for this purpose. These blankets require time to get warm, with agitation often used to accelerate the exothermic reaction. Many search and rescue teams use chemical heat blankets, but optimal activation of the blankets remains uncertain. This study investigated how varying oxygen exposure durations affect the thermal performance of these blankets to guide their optimal use in search and rescue scenarios.MethodsIn room-temperature conditions, a full-body manikin was wrapped in a standardized hypothermia model, including a chemical heat blanket, and evaluated under 3 conditions: 1) no shaking, 2) shaking for 2 min, and 3) shaking for 15 min before wrapping. Thermometers were placed inside the heating panel pockets and secured in place with tape to ensure consistent measurements. Temperature data were collected over 6 h, and each scenario was performed 4 times.ResultsBlankets shaken for 2 min achieved higher initial temperatures than those not shaken, with a significant difference sustained for 88 min. Shaking for 15 min resulted in higher initial temperatures than 2-min shaking, with no long-term difference. All scenarios converged to the same temperature (36°C) after 6 h.ConclusionShaking the blanket for 2 min significantly improved early heating performance, whereas longer shaking offered minimal benefit. These findings suggest that short preparation time may be adequate in optimizing thermal delivery and reducing the time to treatment for patients with prehospital accidental hypothermia.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信