{"title":"Digital Mirror Therapy and Action Observation Therapy for Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yu-Wei Hsieh, Meng-Ta Lee, Ya-Ching Hsu, Kai-Yu Wu, Chih-Chi Chen","doi":"10.1155/oti/8741362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study is aimed at testing the immediate and retained treatment efficacies of digital mirror therapy (DMT) and digital action observation therapy (DAOT) on clinical outcomes in chronic stroke patients, in comparison with dose-matched, active control rehabilitation (CR). <b>Methods:</b> Nineteen patients were randomly assigned to the DMT, DAOT, or CR for 3 weeks. Outcome measures, including the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, Motor Activity Log (MAL), and visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D-5L, were conducted at preintervention (T0), postintervention (T1), and 1-month follow-up (T2). <b>Results:</b> There were no significant differences among the three groups on the outcomes at different time points. However, in the DMT group, scores were significantly higher on the FMA-UE and the CAHAI at T2 than at T0; in the DAOT group, those on the FMA-UE and the quality of movement subscale of the MAL were significantly higher at T2 than at T0. In the CR group, scores on the FMA-UE and the CAHAI were significantly higher at T1 than at T0. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both DMT and DAOT had retained treatment effects on motor function. DMT and DAOT might be feasible as alternative intervention strategies for chronic stroke patients. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04441190.</p>","PeriodicalId":49140,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Therapy International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8741362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Therapy International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/oti/8741362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study is aimed at testing the immediate and retained treatment efficacies of digital mirror therapy (DMT) and digital action observation therapy (DAOT) on clinical outcomes in chronic stroke patients, in comparison with dose-matched, active control rehabilitation (CR). Methods: Nineteen patients were randomly assigned to the DMT, DAOT, or CR for 3 weeks. Outcome measures, including the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, Motor Activity Log (MAL), and visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D-5L, were conducted at preintervention (T0), postintervention (T1), and 1-month follow-up (T2). Results: There were no significant differences among the three groups on the outcomes at different time points. However, in the DMT group, scores were significantly higher on the FMA-UE and the CAHAI at T2 than at T0; in the DAOT group, those on the FMA-UE and the quality of movement subscale of the MAL were significantly higher at T2 than at T0. In the CR group, scores on the FMA-UE and the CAHAI were significantly higher at T1 than at T0. Conclusions: Both DMT and DAOT had retained treatment effects on motor function. DMT and DAOT might be feasible as alternative intervention strategies for chronic stroke patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04441190.
期刊介绍:
Occupational Therapy International is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing manuscripts that reflect the practice of occupational therapy throughout the world. Research studies or original concept papers are considered for publication. Priority for publication will be given to research studies that provide recommendations for evidence-based practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of a specific treatment method. Single subject case studies evaluating treatment effectiveness are also encouraged. Other topics that are appropriate for the journal include reliability and validity of clinical instruments, assistive technology, community rehabilitation, cultural comparisons, health promotion and wellness.