Effects of Cognitive Load on Stride-to-Stride Variability During Walking Among Participants With and Without Functional Ankle Instability.

Tina Banakheiri, Zahra Mohammadzadeh, Aliyeh Daryabor, Zahra Ebrahim-Abadi, Sedigheh Sadat Naimi, Leila Rahnama
{"title":"Effects of Cognitive Load on Stride-to-Stride Variability During Walking Among Participants With and Without Functional Ankle Instability.","authors":"Tina Banakheiri, Zahra Mohammadzadeh, Aliyeh Daryabor, Zahra Ebrahim-Abadi, Sedigheh Sadat Naimi, Leila Rahnama","doi":"10.1177/19386400251325963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundStudying the dynamics of nonlinear systems under dual-task conditions in people with functional ankle instability (FAI) can provide additional information about the variability of the structure of the system. However, how the cognitive load affects the stride-to-stride variability in the lower extremities throughout walking in those with and without FAI using nonlinear evaluation tools is unknown.MethodsEighteen volunteers with FAI and 19 healthy individuals were recruited for this study. The participants walked on a motor-driven treadmill at their preferred speed, with or without completing a cognitive task involving an auditory Stroop test. A passive retroreflective marker motion-capture system recorded the lower extremity gait kinematics in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes. The largest Lyapunov exponent (LyE) characterizes the variability of the temporal structure in walking patterns. Cognitive task performance was analyzed using error ratio and average reaction time in walking and sitting conditions.ResultsDuring walking with cognitive load, the group with FAI exhibited lower values for the LyE in knee kinematics in the sagittal plane than the normal walking (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.92, P < .001). During normal walking (single task), participants with FAI demonstrated higher knee flexion-extension LyE (95% CI: 0.52-0.93, P = .04) than healthy people. The 2 groups had no significant differences regarding the LyE values for other kinematic variables (P > .05). Regarding cognitive performance, both FAI and healthy groups had remarkably longer reaction times (P < .001) while walking (mean ± SD: 0.92 ± 0.06) compared with the sitting condition (mean ± SD: 0.77 ± 0.03).ConclusionThe reduced variability observed in the walking patterns of individuals with FAI during walking with an added cognitive load suggests a compensatory mechanism due to sensorimotor constraints, highlighting the altered motor control strategies. Dual task and cognitive training may help correct these patterns and improve responses.Levels of Evidence:Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400251325963"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251325963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundStudying the dynamics of nonlinear systems under dual-task conditions in people with functional ankle instability (FAI) can provide additional information about the variability of the structure of the system. However, how the cognitive load affects the stride-to-stride variability in the lower extremities throughout walking in those with and without FAI using nonlinear evaluation tools is unknown.MethodsEighteen volunteers with FAI and 19 healthy individuals were recruited for this study. The participants walked on a motor-driven treadmill at their preferred speed, with or without completing a cognitive task involving an auditory Stroop test. A passive retroreflective marker motion-capture system recorded the lower extremity gait kinematics in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes. The largest Lyapunov exponent (LyE) characterizes the variability of the temporal structure in walking patterns. Cognitive task performance was analyzed using error ratio and average reaction time in walking and sitting conditions.ResultsDuring walking with cognitive load, the group with FAI exhibited lower values for the LyE in knee kinematics in the sagittal plane than the normal walking (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.92, P < .001). During normal walking (single task), participants with FAI demonstrated higher knee flexion-extension LyE (95% CI: 0.52-0.93, P = .04) than healthy people. The 2 groups had no significant differences regarding the LyE values for other kinematic variables (P > .05). Regarding cognitive performance, both FAI and healthy groups had remarkably longer reaction times (P < .001) while walking (mean ± SD: 0.92 ± 0.06) compared with the sitting condition (mean ± SD: 0.77 ± 0.03).ConclusionThe reduced variability observed in the walking patterns of individuals with FAI during walking with an added cognitive load suggests a compensatory mechanism due to sensorimotor constraints, highlighting the altered motor control strategies. Dual task and cognitive training may help correct these patterns and improve responses.Levels of Evidence:Level II.

认知负荷对踝关节功能性失稳和非功能性失稳患者步行时步幅变化的影响
研究功能性踝关节不稳定(FAI)患者双任务条件下非线性系统的动力学可以提供有关系统结构可变性的额外信息。然而,使用非线性评估工具,认知负荷如何影响有或无FAI患者在行走过程中的下肢跨步变异性尚不清楚。方法选取18名FAI患者和19名健康个体进行研究。参与者以自己喜欢的速度在电动跑步机上行走,完成或不完成一项包括听觉Stroop测试的认知任务。一个被动的反向反射标记运动捕捉系统记录了下肢矢状面、额面和横面的步态运动学。最大李雅普诺夫指数(LyE)表征了行走模式中时间结构的变异性。采用误差率和平均反应时间对行走和坐位条件下的认知任务表现进行分析。结果在认知负荷下行走时,FAI组膝关节矢状面运动LyE值低于正常行走组(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.44-0.92, P < .001)。在正常行走(单任务)时,FAI患者比健康人表现出更高的膝关节屈伸LyE (95% CI: 0.52-0.93, P = 0.04)。两组在其他运动变量的LyE值方面无显著差异(P < 0.05)。在认知表现方面,FAI组和健康组在行走时的反应时间(平均±SD: 0.92±0.06)明显长于坐着时的反应时间(平均±SD: 0.77±0.03)(P < 0.001)。结论:在认知负荷增加的情况下,FAI患者行走模式的可变性降低,表明存在一种由感觉运动限制引起的代偿机制,突出了运动控制策略的改变。双重任务和认知训练可能有助于纠正这些模式并改善反应。证据等级:二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信