The generation of hydrogen peroxide and antibacterial effectiveness by copper oxide surface layers.

Yurika Taniguchi, Hiroshi Kawakami, Sadao Komemushi, Ken Hirota, Takashi Ozawa, Kazunori Miyamoto, Hiroaki Nakayama, Masahiko Wada
{"title":"The generation of hydrogen peroxide and antibacterial effectiveness by copper oxide surface layers.","authors":"Yurika Taniguchi, Hiroshi Kawakami, Sadao Komemushi, Ken Hirota, Takashi Ozawa, Kazunori Miyamoto, Hiroaki Nakayama, Masahiko Wada","doi":"10.4265/jmc.30.1_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Copper is known as an antibacterial material. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) with antibacterial effectiveness are generated on copper surfaces mainly by the Fenton-type reaction. The antibacterial effectiveness is higher in Cu<sub>2</sub>O than in CuO. In this study we discussed the effects of the difference in the amount of generated ROS on the difference in the antibacterial effectiveness between Cu<sub>2</sub>O and CuO. Both Cu<sub>2</sub>O and CuO produced hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), hydroxyl radical(・OH), and singlet oxygen (<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>), but not superoxide radical (・O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>). The concentration of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> produced was higher in Cu<sub>2</sub>O than in CuO. When catalase, a scavenger of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, was added, the antibacterial activities of both Cu<sub>2</sub>O and CuO reduced to almost the same value. These experimental results indicate that Cu<sub>2</sub>O is higher in antibacterial effectiveness than CuO because Cu<sub>2</sub>O produced more H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> than CuO. As ・OH was detected even when H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was scavenged by catalase before it reacted with Cu ion, a part of ・OH was generated by chemical reactions different from the Fenton-type reaction when copper oxides were in contact with water.</p>","PeriodicalId":73831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microorganism control","volume":"30 1","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microorganism control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4265/jmc.30.1_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Copper is known as an antibacterial material. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) with antibacterial effectiveness are generated on copper surfaces mainly by the Fenton-type reaction. The antibacterial effectiveness is higher in Cu2O than in CuO. In this study we discussed the effects of the difference in the amount of generated ROS on the difference in the antibacterial effectiveness between Cu2O and CuO. Both Cu2O and CuO produced hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical(・OH), and singlet oxygen (1O2), but not superoxide radical (・O2-). The concentration of H2O2 produced was higher in Cu2O than in CuO. When catalase, a scavenger of H2O2, was added, the antibacterial activities of both Cu2O and CuO reduced to almost the same value. These experimental results indicate that Cu2O is higher in antibacterial effectiveness than CuO because Cu2O produced more H2O2 than CuO. As ・OH was detected even when H2O2 was scavenged by catalase before it reacted with Cu ion, a part of ・OH was generated by chemical reactions different from the Fenton-type reaction when copper oxides were in contact with water.

过氧化氢的产生和抗菌效果由氧化铜表面层。
铜被认为是一种抗菌材料。具有抗菌作用的活性氧(ROS)主要通过fenton型反应在铜表面产生。Cu2O的抗菌效果高于CuO。本研究探讨了活性氧生成量的差异对Cu2O和CuO抗菌效果差异的影响。Cu2O和CuO都会产生过氧化氢(H2O2)、羟基自由基(OH)和单线态氧(1O2),但不会产生超氧自由基(O2-)。在Cu2O中产生的H2O2浓度高于CuO。当添加过氧化氢酶(H2O2的清除剂)时,Cu2O和CuO的抑菌活性几乎下降到相同的值。实验结果表明,Cu2O的抑菌效果优于CuO,这是因为Cu2O比CuO产生更多的H2O2。由于在H2O2与Cu离子反应之前,即使过氧化氢酶清除了H2O2,也能检测到不噢噢,当氧化铜与水接触时,部分不噢噢是由不同于芬顿型反应的化学反应产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信