The generation of hydrogen peroxide and antibacterial effectiveness by copper oxide surface layers.

Yurika Taniguchi, Hiroshi Kawakami, Sadao Komemushi, Ken Hirota, Takashi Ozawa, Kazunori Miyamoto, Hiroaki Nakayama, Masahiko Wada
{"title":"The generation of hydrogen peroxide and antibacterial effectiveness by copper oxide surface layers.","authors":"Yurika Taniguchi, Hiroshi Kawakami, Sadao Komemushi, Ken Hirota, Takashi Ozawa, Kazunori Miyamoto, Hiroaki Nakayama, Masahiko Wada","doi":"10.4265/jmc.30.1_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Copper is known as an antibacterial material. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) with antibacterial effectiveness are generated on copper surfaces mainly by the Fenton-type reaction. The antibacterial effectiveness is higher in Cu<sub>2</sub>O than in CuO. In this study we discussed the effects of the difference in the amount of generated ROS on the difference in the antibacterial effectiveness between Cu<sub>2</sub>O and CuO. Both Cu<sub>2</sub>O and CuO produced hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), hydroxyl radical(・OH), and singlet oxygen (<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>), but not superoxide radical (・O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>). The concentration of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> produced was higher in Cu<sub>2</sub>O than in CuO. When catalase, a scavenger of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, was added, the antibacterial activities of both Cu<sub>2</sub>O and CuO reduced to almost the same value. These experimental results indicate that Cu<sub>2</sub>O is higher in antibacterial effectiveness than CuO because Cu<sub>2</sub>O produced more H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> than CuO. As ・OH was detected even when H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was scavenged by catalase before it reacted with Cu ion, a part of ・OH was generated by chemical reactions different from the Fenton-type reaction when copper oxides were in contact with water.</p>","PeriodicalId":73831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microorganism control","volume":"30 1","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microorganism control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4265/jmc.30.1_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Copper is known as an antibacterial material. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) with antibacterial effectiveness are generated on copper surfaces mainly by the Fenton-type reaction. The antibacterial effectiveness is higher in Cu2O than in CuO. In this study we discussed the effects of the difference in the amount of generated ROS on the difference in the antibacterial effectiveness between Cu2O and CuO. Both Cu2O and CuO produced hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical(・OH), and singlet oxygen (1O2), but not superoxide radical (・O2-). The concentration of H2O2 produced was higher in Cu2O than in CuO. When catalase, a scavenger of H2O2, was added, the antibacterial activities of both Cu2O and CuO reduced to almost the same value. These experimental results indicate that Cu2O is higher in antibacterial effectiveness than CuO because Cu2O produced more H2O2 than CuO. As ・OH was detected even when H2O2 was scavenged by catalase before it reacted with Cu ion, a part of ・OH was generated by chemical reactions different from the Fenton-type reaction when copper oxides were in contact with water.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信