Parent Feedback on the Reducing Emotional Distress for Childhood Hypoglycemia in Parents (REDCHiP) Intervention: A Qualitative Analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Nicole A Kahhan, MaryJane S Campbell, Mark A Clements, Kimberly A Driscoll, Amy I Milkes, Holly K O'Donnell, Susana R Patton
{"title":"Parent Feedback on the Reducing Emotional Distress for Childhood Hypoglycemia in Parents (REDCHiP) Intervention: A Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Nicole A Kahhan, MaryJane S Campbell, Mark A Clements, Kimberly A Driscoll, Amy I Milkes, Holly K O'Donnell, Susana R Patton","doi":"10.3390/children12030360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Severe hypoglycemia is more common among young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) than older youth, and parents report significant hypoglycemia fear (HF). Parents experiencing HF describe constant and extreme worry about the occurrence of hypoglycemia and may engage in potentially risky behaviors to avoid hypoglycemia. Our team developed and tested a behavioral intervention, Reducing Emotional Distress for Childhood Hypoglycemia in Parents (REDCHiP), to decrease HF in parents of young children with T1DM. Here, we qualitatively analyzed parent feedback to refine and optimize future intervention iterations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The randomized pilot study included parents (<i>n</i> = 73) of young children with T1DM who participated in the 10-session video-based intervention. We qualitatively analyzed 21 recordings of the final intervention session, where parents provided feedback about intervention content. Trained coders independently reviewed each session. The frequency of parent quotes regarding active REDCHiP treatment components were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coded themes reflected active treatment components [viz., Use of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Skills, Coping, Behavioral Parenting Strategies]. Also, two secondary process codes were identified: Appreciate REDCHiP Content and Challenges in Applying REDCHiP Strategies. Parents provided examples of skills or concepts they applied from REDCHiP, the challenges they encountered, and if they planned to apply these skills in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A qualitative analysis provided insight into parent perceptions of the active treatment components within the REDCHiP intervention, their acceptability, and parents' intention to apply REDCHiP skills/concepts within daily T1DM cares. Future iterations of the intervention that trial alternative formats (i.e., individual vs. group and asynchronous vs. telehealth) may increase accessibility and scalability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12030360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Severe hypoglycemia is more common among young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) than older youth, and parents report significant hypoglycemia fear (HF). Parents experiencing HF describe constant and extreme worry about the occurrence of hypoglycemia and may engage in potentially risky behaviors to avoid hypoglycemia. Our team developed and tested a behavioral intervention, Reducing Emotional Distress for Childhood Hypoglycemia in Parents (REDCHiP), to decrease HF in parents of young children with T1DM. Here, we qualitatively analyzed parent feedback to refine and optimize future intervention iterations.

Methods: The randomized pilot study included parents (n = 73) of young children with T1DM who participated in the 10-session video-based intervention. We qualitatively analyzed 21 recordings of the final intervention session, where parents provided feedback about intervention content. Trained coders independently reviewed each session. The frequency of parent quotes regarding active REDCHiP treatment components were calculated.

Results: The coded themes reflected active treatment components [viz., Use of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Skills, Coping, Behavioral Parenting Strategies]. Also, two secondary process codes were identified: Appreciate REDCHiP Content and Challenges in Applying REDCHiP Strategies. Parents provided examples of skills or concepts they applied from REDCHiP, the challenges they encountered, and if they planned to apply these skills in the future.

Conclusions: A qualitative analysis provided insight into parent perceptions of the active treatment components within the REDCHiP intervention, their acceptability, and parents' intention to apply REDCHiP skills/concepts within daily T1DM cares. Future iterations of the intervention that trial alternative formats (i.e., individual vs. group and asynchronous vs. telehealth) may increase accessibility and scalability.

父母干预对降低儿童低血糖情绪困扰的反馈:一项定性分析。
目的:1型糖尿病(T1DM)患儿中严重低血糖比年长的青少年更常见,家长报告了明显的低血糖恐惧(HF)。患有心衰的父母经常极度担心低血糖的发生,并可能采取潜在的危险行为来避免低血糖。我们的团队开发并测试了一种行为干预,减少父母儿童低血糖的情绪困扰(REDCHiP),以减少年幼T1DM儿童父母的HF。在这里,我们定性地分析了家长的反馈,以改进和优化未来的干预迭代。方法:随机试点研究纳入了参加10次视频干预的年幼T1DM儿童的父母(n = 73)。我们定性分析了最后一次干预的21段录音,其中家长提供了对干预内容的反馈。训练有素的程序员独立审查每个会话。计算有关有效REDCHiP治疗成分的父母报价的频率。结果:编码主题反映了积极的治疗成分[即认知行为治疗(CBT)技能的使用,应对,行为育儿策略]。此外,还确定了两个次要过程代码:欣赏REDCHiP内容和应用REDCHiP策略的挑战。家长们提供了他们在REDCHiP中应用的技能或概念的例子,他们遇到的挑战,以及他们是否计划在未来应用这些技能。结论:定性分析提供了家长对REDCHiP干预中积极治疗成分的看法,他们的可接受性,以及家长在日常T1DM护理中应用REDCHiP技能/概念的意图。试验替代形式(即个人与团体、异步与远程医疗)的干预措施的未来迭代可能会增加可访问性和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信