Adaptation and Validation of the Serbian Version of Dyslexia Screening Test-Junior.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Tanja Lukovac, Vitomir Jovanović, Svetlana Petronijević, Jovana Radović, Neda Milošević Dedakin, Tatjana Savić, Dragan Pavlović
{"title":"Adaptation and Validation of the Serbian Version of Dyslexia Screening Test-Junior.","authors":"Tanja Lukovac, Vitomir Jovanović, Svetlana Petronijević, Jovana Radović, Neda Milošević Dedakin, Tatjana Savić, Dragan Pavlović","doi":"10.3390/children12030322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Dyslexia, a prevalent reading disorder, substantially affects children's educational and social development. Early diagnosis is essential for timely intervention; however, Serbia lacks a standardized instrument for assessing dyslexia in primary school children. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and predictive validity of the Dyslexia Screening Test-Junior (DST-J), which was adapted for the Serbian language and cultural context. <b>Methods</b>: The study sample comprised 647 children from the general population, aged 6 years and 6 months to 11 years and 5 months, along with 30 children of comparable age exhibiting reading difficulties. The assessment of validity was based on the at-risk quotient, predictive validity, and test-retest reliability. <b>Results</b>: Significant differences in at-risk quotient (ARQ) scores were found between children with and without dyslexia (t = 14.90, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with boys, particularly those aged 9.6 to 10.5 years, having higher risk scores than girls. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.704), and construct validity was confirmed by correlations with external measures, which explained 44% of the variance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.44; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Predictive validity was high for key subtests such as rapid naming and phonemic segmentation, reaching maximum accuracy (sensitivity and specificity = 1). <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings indicate that the adapted DST-J is effective in identifying dyslexia risk among Serbian primary school children. The innovation of this study lies in the cultural adaptation of the DST-J, with future research directed towards refining this instrument and exploring additional diagnostic criteria to enhance its accuracy and inclusivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12030322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Dyslexia, a prevalent reading disorder, substantially affects children's educational and social development. Early diagnosis is essential for timely intervention; however, Serbia lacks a standardized instrument for assessing dyslexia in primary school children. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and predictive validity of the Dyslexia Screening Test-Junior (DST-J), which was adapted for the Serbian language and cultural context. Methods: The study sample comprised 647 children from the general population, aged 6 years and 6 months to 11 years and 5 months, along with 30 children of comparable age exhibiting reading difficulties. The assessment of validity was based on the at-risk quotient, predictive validity, and test-retest reliability. Results: Significant differences in at-risk quotient (ARQ) scores were found between children with and without dyslexia (t = 14.90, p < 0.001), with boys, particularly those aged 9.6 to 10.5 years, having higher risk scores than girls. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.704), and construct validity was confirmed by correlations with external measures, which explained 44% of the variance (R2 = 0.44; p < 0.01). Predictive validity was high for key subtests such as rapid naming and phonemic segmentation, reaching maximum accuracy (sensitivity and specificity = 1). Conclusions: The findings indicate that the adapted DST-J is effective in identifying dyslexia risk among Serbian primary school children. The innovation of this study lies in the cultural adaptation of the DST-J, with future research directed towards refining this instrument and exploring additional diagnostic criteria to enhance its accuracy and inclusivity.

塞尔维亚语版阅读障碍筛查测验的适应与验证。
背景/目的:难语症是一种常见的阅读障碍,严重影响儿童的教育和社会发展。早期诊断对于及时干预至关重要;然而,塞尔维亚缺乏评估小学生阅读障碍的标准化工具。本研究旨在评估适用于塞尔维亚语言和文化背景的儿童阅读障碍筛查测试(DST-J)的信度和预测效度。方法:研究样本包括647名6岁零6个月至11岁零5个月的普通儿童,以及30名同龄的阅读困难儿童。效度评估基于风险商、预测效度和重测信度。结果:有阅读障碍和没有阅读障碍的儿童在风险商(ARQ)评分上存在显著差异(t = 14.90, p < 0.001),男孩,特别是9.6至10.5岁的男孩的风险评分高于女孩。内部一致性是可以接受的(Cronbach's α = 0.704),结构效度通过与外部测量的相关性得到证实,解释了44%的方差(R2 = 0.44;P < 0.01)。预测效度较高的关键子测试,如快速命名和音位分割,达到最高的准确性(敏感性和特异性= 1)。结论:研究结果表明,适应的DST-J是识别塞尔维亚小学儿童阅读障碍风险的有效方法。本研究的创新之处在于DST-J的文化适应性,未来的研究将致力于完善这一工具,并探索其他诊断标准,以提高其准确性和包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信