Methodological Components for Evaluating Intervention Effectiveness of SOS Feeding Approach: A Feasibility Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Sarah A Schoen, Rachel Balderrama, Emma Dopheide, Ariel Harris, Laura Hoffman, Samantha Sasse
{"title":"Methodological Components for Evaluating Intervention Effectiveness of SOS Feeding Approach: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Sarah A Schoen, Rachel Balderrama, Emma Dopheide, Ariel Harris, Laura Hoffman, Samantha Sasse","doi":"10.3390/children12030373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: There is a paucity of research that explores the effectiveness of the Sequential Oral Sensory (SOS) Approach to Feeding. The purpose of this feasibility study was to evaluate the necessary components for the implementation of a treatment effectiveness study on the Sequential Oral Sensory (SOS) Approach to Feeding. The primary aims were to develop a fidelity measure, determine the feasibility of video coding, create an observational coding scheme, and determine if the outcome measures were sensitive to change. <b>Methods</b>: Over a 4-year period, data were collected from twelve participants aged 4 to 8 years with developmental disorders, with the assistance of four occupational therapy doctoral students. A fidelity measure was created, and inter-rater reliability was established among the four coders. Videotapes were collected at home and in the clinic. A behavioral coding system, consistent with the SOS Steps to Eating hierarchy, was developed for scoring feeding behaviors. <b>Results</b>: The preliminary inter-rater reliability was reported, and the coding results were represented graphically. Two additional outcome measures were piloted-a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Parenting Stress Index (PSI). The VAS was sensitive to changes in each parent's ability to support their child, as well as in each client's progress. The PSI also showed sensitivity to changes in the decline of parent-reported stress and child stress indices. <b>Conclusions</b>: Findings demonstrate fidelity to the SOS Approach, as well as sensitive outcomes, using behavioral coding and parent-reported measures. These evidence-based tools and procedures offer researchers and clinicians objective and meaningful feeding outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12030373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: There is a paucity of research that explores the effectiveness of the Sequential Oral Sensory (SOS) Approach to Feeding. The purpose of this feasibility study was to evaluate the necessary components for the implementation of a treatment effectiveness study on the Sequential Oral Sensory (SOS) Approach to Feeding. The primary aims were to develop a fidelity measure, determine the feasibility of video coding, create an observational coding scheme, and determine if the outcome measures were sensitive to change. Methods: Over a 4-year period, data were collected from twelve participants aged 4 to 8 years with developmental disorders, with the assistance of four occupational therapy doctoral students. A fidelity measure was created, and inter-rater reliability was established among the four coders. Videotapes were collected at home and in the clinic. A behavioral coding system, consistent with the SOS Steps to Eating hierarchy, was developed for scoring feeding behaviors. Results: The preliminary inter-rater reliability was reported, and the coding results were represented graphically. Two additional outcome measures were piloted-a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Parenting Stress Index (PSI). The VAS was sensitive to changes in each parent's ability to support their child, as well as in each client's progress. The PSI also showed sensitivity to changes in the decline of parent-reported stress and child stress indices. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate fidelity to the SOS Approach, as well as sensitive outcomes, using behavioral coding and parent-reported measures. These evidence-based tools and procedures offer researchers and clinicians objective and meaningful feeding outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信