Validation of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) in the Context of Trauma-Focused Treatment.

IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Chris M Hoeboer, Nomi Bodor, Danielle A C Oprel, Rianne A de Kleine, Maartje Schoorl, Agnes van Minnen, Willem van der Does
{"title":"Validation of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) in the Context of Trauma-Focused Treatment.","authors":"Chris M Hoeboer, Nomi Bodor, Danielle A C Oprel, Rianne A de Kleine, Maartje Schoorl, Agnes van Minnen, Willem van der Does","doi":"10.1177/10775595251328611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) is widely used, but retrospective self-report measures may be susceptible to bias especially in the context of pathology. Therefore, we aimed to validate the CTQ in the context of reduced psychopathology following trauma-focused treatment. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed 149 outpatients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to childhood abuse. Participants received one of three variants of prolonged exposure. The CTQ was administered at baseline and six months later. The internal consistency of the CTQ was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, inter-item and item-total correlations. Convergent validity was assessed with the clinician administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). The consistency of CTQ scores over time was analyzed using linear mixed models and intra-class correlation coefficients. <b>Results:</b> Most CTQ subscales demonstrated high internal consistency and satisfactory inter-item and item-total correlations except for physical neglect and minimization/denial subscales. CTQ subscales physical and sexual abuse exhibited adequate convergent validity with the CAPS-5. None of the CTQ subscales mean score changed significantly from baseline to follow-up. Agreement between the baseline and follow-up assessment within-persons was moderate at item-level but good at subscale-level except for subscale minimization/denial. Minimization/denial at baseline and change in symptomatology during treatment were not significantly related to change in CTQ subscale scores. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings support the use of the CTQ subscales to retrospectively assess childhood maltreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48052,"journal":{"name":"Child Maltreatment","volume":" ","pages":"10775595251328611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Maltreatment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595251328611","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) is widely used, but retrospective self-report measures may be susceptible to bias especially in the context of pathology. Therefore, we aimed to validate the CTQ in the context of reduced psychopathology following trauma-focused treatment. Methods: We analyzed 149 outpatients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to childhood abuse. Participants received one of three variants of prolonged exposure. The CTQ was administered at baseline and six months later. The internal consistency of the CTQ was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, inter-item and item-total correlations. Convergent validity was assessed with the clinician administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). The consistency of CTQ scores over time was analyzed using linear mixed models and intra-class correlation coefficients. Results: Most CTQ subscales demonstrated high internal consistency and satisfactory inter-item and item-total correlations except for physical neglect and minimization/denial subscales. CTQ subscales physical and sexual abuse exhibited adequate convergent validity with the CAPS-5. None of the CTQ subscales mean score changed significantly from baseline to follow-up. Agreement between the baseline and follow-up assessment within-persons was moderate at item-level but good at subscale-level except for subscale minimization/denial. Minimization/denial at baseline and change in symptomatology during treatment were not significantly related to change in CTQ subscale scores. Conclusions: These findings support the use of the CTQ subscales to retrospectively assess childhood maltreatment.

儿童创伤问卷(CTQ)在创伤聚焦治疗中的验证。
背景:儿童创伤问卷(CTQ)被广泛使用,但回顾性自我报告测量可能容易产生偏差,特别是在病理背景下。因此,我们的目的是在创伤治疗后减少精神病理的背景下验证CTQ。方法:对149例儿童期受虐相关的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)门诊患者进行分析。参与者接受了三种不同的长时间暴露。CTQ分别在基线和6个月后进行。CTQ的内部一致性采用Cronbach's alpha、项目间相关性和项目总相关性进行评估。采用临床医师管理的DSM-5 PTSD量表(CAPS-5)评估收敛效度。使用线性混合模型和类内相关系数分析CTQ分数随时间的一致性。结果:除了身体忽视和最小化/拒绝外,大多数CTQ分量表表现出高度的内部一致性和令人满意的项目间和项目总体相关性。CTQ的身体虐待和性虐待分量表与cap -5表现出足够的收敛效度。从基线到随访,CTQ各分量表的平均得分均无显著变化。基线和随访评估之间的一致性在项目水平上是中等的,但在子量表水平上良好,除了子量表最小化/否认。基线的最小化/拒绝和治疗期间症状的变化与CTQ亚量表得分的变化无显著相关。结论:这些发现支持使用CTQ量表来回顾性评估儿童虐待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Maltreatment
Child Maltreatment Multiple-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.80%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Child Maltreatment is the official journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC), the nation"s largest interdisciplinary child maltreatment professional organization. Child Maltreatment"s object is to foster professional excellence in the field of child abuse and neglect by reporting current and at-issue scientific information and technical innovations in a form immediately useful to practitioners and researchers from mental health, child protection, law, law enforcement, medicine, nursing, and allied disciplines. Child Maltreatment emphasizes perspectives with a rigorous scientific base that are relevant to policy, practice, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信