Minimally Invasive vs Open First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Cheilectomy: Radiographic Outcomes and Early Complications.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Noopur Ranganathan, Marium Raza, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Christopher P Miller
{"title":"Minimally Invasive vs Open First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Cheilectomy: Radiographic Outcomes and Early Complications.","authors":"Noopur Ranganathan, Marium Raza, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Christopher P Miller","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.81570.3715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Current literature on surgical techniques has evaluated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cheilectomy and its efficacy in comparison to the open technique. However, no study to date has evaluated MIS-Moberg in relation to open and MIS cheilectomy. This study assessed radiological outcomes and early healing and complications of patients who underwent open, MIS, and MIS-Moberg cheilectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort review of 134 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) cheilectomy at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2024. Success of cheilectomy was determined radiographically. Postoperative complications were identified through medical record review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73 open and 61 MIS cheilectomies were performed on 134 patients with a primary diagnosis of hallux rigidus. The pre-operative versus post-operative differences in dorsal cortical length (3.7±1.4) and sagittal articular P1 angle (7.3±4.8) were found to be statistically significant (P<0.05) for the MIS-Moberg group. Ten patients in the open cheilectomy were found to have dorsiflexion and plantarflexion stiffness compared to zero patients in the MIS and MIS-Moberg groups (P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed a significantly greater rate of plantar- and dorsiflexion stiffness in open surgeries compared to MIS and MIS-Moberg. No other differences in healing rates or radiologic outcomes were observed. Based on preliminary results, the MIS-Moberg can successfully alter the radiographic alignment of the great toe and does not increase complications as compared to open or MIS cheilectomy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 3","pages":"152-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.81570.3715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Current literature on surgical techniques has evaluated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cheilectomy and its efficacy in comparison to the open technique. However, no study to date has evaluated MIS-Moberg in relation to open and MIS cheilectomy. This study assessed radiological outcomes and early healing and complications of patients who underwent open, MIS, and MIS-Moberg cheilectomies.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort review of 134 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) cheilectomy at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2024. Success of cheilectomy was determined radiographically. Postoperative complications were identified through medical record review.

Results: 73 open and 61 MIS cheilectomies were performed on 134 patients with a primary diagnosis of hallux rigidus. The pre-operative versus post-operative differences in dorsal cortical length (3.7±1.4) and sagittal articular P1 angle (7.3±4.8) were found to be statistically significant (P<0.05) for the MIS-Moberg group. Ten patients in the open cheilectomy were found to have dorsiflexion and plantarflexion stiffness compared to zero patients in the MIS and MIS-Moberg groups (P<0.01).

Conclusion: We showed a significantly greater rate of plantar- and dorsiflexion stiffness in open surgeries compared to MIS and MIS-Moberg. No other differences in healing rates or radiologic outcomes were observed. Based on preliminary results, the MIS-Moberg can successfully alter the radiographic alignment of the great toe and does not increase complications as compared to open or MIS cheilectomy alone.

微创与开放式第一跖趾关节颧骨切除术:影像学结果和早期并发症。
目的:目前关于外科技术的文献已经评估了微创手术(MIS)颧骨切除术及其与开放技术的比较效果。然而,迄今为止还没有研究评估MIS- moberg与开放式和MIS颧骨切除术的关系。本研究评估了接受开放、MIS和MIS- moberg颧骨切除术患者的放射学结果、早期愈合和并发症。方法:我们对2015年至2024年间在某学术医疗中心接受首次跖趾趾(MTP)颧骨切除术的134例患者进行了回顾性队列分析。颧骨切除术的成功是由x线片决定的。通过病历检查确定术后并发症。结果:对134例以拇僵直为首发诊断的患者进行了73例开放式和61例MIS双趾切除术。术前与术后背皮质长度(3.7±1.4)和矢状关节P1角(7.3±4.8)的差异具有统计学意义(结论:与MIS和MIS- moberg相比,我们发现开放手术的足底和背屈刚度率显著高于开放手术。在治愈率或放射学结果方面没有观察到其他差异。根据初步结果,MIS- moberg可以成功地改变大脚趾的x线线,并且与单纯的切开或MIS截骨相比,不会增加并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信