Comparison of Proanthocyanidin and EDTA in Enhancing Shear Bond Strength of Giomer and Cention N to Human Dentin: An In vitro Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Shobana Shetty, Namith Rai, Kushal Shetty, Arun Mayya, Akshatha Chatra, Preethish Shetty
{"title":"Comparison of Proanthocyanidin and EDTA in Enhancing Shear Bond Strength of Giomer and Cention N to Human Dentin: An <i>In vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Shobana Shetty, Namith Rai, Kushal Shetty, Arun Mayya, Akshatha Chatra, Preethish Shetty","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_178_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Achieving durable bonding to dentin remains a challenge in restorative dentistry due to its complex structure and composition. Conditioning agents, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and proanthocyanidins (PACs), are used to modify the smear layer and enhance adhesion. PACs have shown promise in improving bond strength through collagen cross-linking. This <i>in vitro</i> study compared the effects of 17% EDTA and PAC conditioning on the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to human dentin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty extracted human premolars and molars were randomly divided into three conditioning groups (<i>n</i> = 20 per group): 17% EDTA (MD-Cleanser, Meta Biomed Co. Ltd., Cheongju, Korea), 6.5% PAC solution, and an intact smear layer (control). Each conditioning group was further subdivided (<i>n</i> = 10 per subgroup) based on the restorative material: Giomer (Beautifil II, Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and Cention N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Shear bond strength was measured using an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PAC conditioning resulted in the highest mean shear bond strength (5.34 ± 1.93 MPa), significantly higher than the intact smear layer (3.77 ± 1.74 MPa; mean difference = 1.57 MPa, <i>P</i> = 0.008). No statistically significant difference was found between PAC and 17% EDTA (4.55 ± 1.64 MPa). Giomer (5.33 ± 1.86 MPa) exhibited significantly greater shear bond strength than Cention N (3.78 ± 1.52 MPa; mean difference = 1.55 MPa, <i>P</i> < 0.001) across all conditioning methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAC conditioning significantly improved the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to dentin compared to the intact smear layer. Giomer demonstrated superior bond strength compared to Cention N regardless of the conditioning agent used. These findings suggest that PAC may be a promising dentin conditioning agent for enhancing the durability of bonded restorations. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these <i>in vitro</i> findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","volume":"15 1","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_178_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Achieving durable bonding to dentin remains a challenge in restorative dentistry due to its complex structure and composition. Conditioning agents, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and proanthocyanidins (PACs), are used to modify the smear layer and enhance adhesion. PACs have shown promise in improving bond strength through collagen cross-linking. This in vitro study compared the effects of 17% EDTA and PAC conditioning on the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to human dentin.

Materials and methods: Sixty extracted human premolars and molars were randomly divided into three conditioning groups (n = 20 per group): 17% EDTA (MD-Cleanser, Meta Biomed Co. Ltd., Cheongju, Korea), 6.5% PAC solution, and an intact smear layer (control). Each conditioning group was further subdivided (n = 10 per subgroup) based on the restorative material: Giomer (Beautifil II, Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and Cention N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Shear bond strength was measured using an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test.

Results: PAC conditioning resulted in the highest mean shear bond strength (5.34 ± 1.93 MPa), significantly higher than the intact smear layer (3.77 ± 1.74 MPa; mean difference = 1.57 MPa, P = 0.008). No statistically significant difference was found between PAC and 17% EDTA (4.55 ± 1.64 MPa). Giomer (5.33 ± 1.86 MPa) exhibited significantly greater shear bond strength than Cention N (3.78 ± 1.52 MPa; mean difference = 1.55 MPa, P < 0.001) across all conditioning methods.

Conclusion: PAC conditioning significantly improved the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to dentin compared to the intact smear layer. Giomer demonstrated superior bond strength compared to Cention N regardless of the conditioning agent used. These findings suggest that PAC may be a promising dentin conditioning agent for enhancing the durability of bonded restorations. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these in vitro findings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: -Preventive and Community dentistry (Dental public health)- Endodontics- Oral and maxillofacial pathology- Oral and maxillofacial radiology- Oral and maxillofacial surgery (also called oral surgery)- Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics- Periodontology (also called periodontics)- Pediatric dentistry (also called pedodontics)- Prosthodontics (also called prosthetic dentistry)- Oral medicine- Special needs dentistry (also called special care dentistry)- Oral Biology- Forensic odontology- Geriatric dentistry or Geriodontics- Preventive and Social Medicine (Public health)- Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry, preventive and community dentistry including oral epidemiology, oral health services research, oral health education and promotion, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, dental jurisprudence, ethics and oral health, economics, and quality assessment, recent advances in preventive dentistry and community dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信