Cochlear Duct Length: Rethinking Its Role in Auditory Outcomes.

IF 0.7 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Priyank Agrawal, Vishudh Mohan, Vidhu Sharma, Darwin Kaushal, Sarbesh Tiwari, Kapil Soni, Pushpinder S Khera, Amit Goyal
{"title":"Cochlear Duct Length: Rethinking Its Role in Auditory Outcomes.","authors":"Priyank Agrawal, Vishudh Mohan, Vidhu Sharma, Darwin Kaushal, Sarbesh Tiwari, Kapil Soni, Pushpinder S Khera, Amit Goyal","doi":"10.4274/tao.2024.2024-8-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relation between cochlear duct length (CDL) and audiological outcome after cochlear implant surgery in prelingually deafened children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective cohort study, 36 prelingually deaf children underwent cochlear implantation at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and high-resolution T2 weighted sequences magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of temporal bones were used to calculate CDL. Patients were followed up for 12 months postoperatively with visits every three months for audiological scoring (infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale and revised central auditory processing scores).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six candidates were included in the study. The mean CDL, as measured on temporal bone HRCT, was 32.72±1.278 mm, and, with MRI, was 33.4689±1.31. This study is suggestive of widely dispersed data (coefficient of variance <0.5), and hence, the hypothesis of \"implantation in CDL close to 31.5 mm will give the best improvement in functional outcome scores\" cannot be generalized. The improvement in functional outcome scores is likely attributable to other causes/multifactorial causation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no relationship between CDL and audiological outcomes post-cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children. Further research with larger sample sizes, prospective multicenter designs and extended follow-up periods is warranted to strengthen evidence in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":44240,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"62 4","pages":"124-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2024.2024-8-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the relation between cochlear duct length (CDL) and audiological outcome after cochlear implant surgery in prelingually deafened children.

Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 36 prelingually deaf children underwent cochlear implantation at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and high-resolution T2 weighted sequences magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of temporal bones were used to calculate CDL. Patients were followed up for 12 months postoperatively with visits every three months for audiological scoring (infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale and revised central auditory processing scores).

Results: Thirty-six candidates were included in the study. The mean CDL, as measured on temporal bone HRCT, was 32.72±1.278 mm, and, with MRI, was 33.4689±1.31. This study is suggestive of widely dispersed data (coefficient of variance <0.5), and hence, the hypothesis of "implantation in CDL close to 31.5 mm will give the best improvement in functional outcome scores" cannot be generalized. The improvement in functional outcome scores is likely attributable to other causes/multifactorial causation.

Conclusion: We found no relationship between CDL and audiological outcomes post-cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children. Further research with larger sample sizes, prospective multicenter designs and extended follow-up periods is warranted to strengthen evidence in this area.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信