Prediction of mortality in cardio-neurovascular patients with sepsis and septic shock: is NEWS-2 better than qSOFA, SOFA, and qPitt? An observational study.

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361251323207
Julian Orlando Casallas-Barrera, Darlyng Aireth Zabala-Muñoz, Carol Viviana Aponte-Carrascal, Angie Marcela Ochoa-Ricardo, Edgar Felipe Quintero-Varela, Juan Nicolas Quiñones-Romero, Jenny Paola Garzón-Ruiz, Edwin Silva-Monsalve, Ricardo Buitrago-Bernal
{"title":"Prediction of mortality in cardio-neurovascular patients with sepsis and septic shock: is NEWS-2 better than qSOFA, SOFA, and qPitt? An observational study.","authors":"Julian Orlando Casallas-Barrera, Darlyng Aireth Zabala-Muñoz, Carol Viviana Aponte-Carrascal, Angie Marcela Ochoa-Ricardo, Edgar Felipe Quintero-Varela, Juan Nicolas Quiñones-Romero, Jenny Paola Garzón-Ruiz, Edwin Silva-Monsalve, Ricardo Buitrago-Bernal","doi":"10.1177/20499361251323207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection and reliable prediction of sepsis-related mortality are crucial. The prognostic value of National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS-2) in sepsis patients with cardiovascular and neurovascular diseases is not well elucidated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate and compare the qSOFA, SOFA, qPitt, and NEWS-2 scores for predicting mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational retrospective study was conducted involving patients with sepsis or septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected between 2023 and 2024. Baseline measures included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. All subjects were identified from a database of a highly complex healthcare institution focused on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular and neurovascular diseases. The scores qSOFA, SOFA, NEWS-2, and qPitt were collected from medical records and analyzed. A sample size was estimated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis was established for each score. A multivariate analysis adjusted for confounding factors through logistic regression was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 participants were included, with a median age of 72 years (IQR: 59-81), and 76 (60.32%) being men. The overall mortality rate in the population was 19.8%, with 84% of deaths occurring in males. Statistically significant differences in variables such as heart failure, mild liver disease, and atrial fibrillation were observed between the groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The NEWS-2 score with a cut-off point of ⩾8 showed a significant association with mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). The AUROC for NEWS-2 was 0.80, compared to a ROC of 0.6960 for qPitt, 0.6776 for SOFA, and 0.5868 for qSOFA (χ<sup>2</sup> = 16.60, Prob > χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.0009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NEWS 2 exhibits better performance in predicting mortality among elderly adults with cardiovascular and neurovascular diseases suffering from sepsis or septic shock, compared to the qPitt, SOFA, and qSOFA scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20499361251323207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251323207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection and reliable prediction of sepsis-related mortality are crucial. The prognostic value of National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS-2) in sepsis patients with cardiovascular and neurovascular diseases is not well elucidated.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate and compare the qSOFA, SOFA, qPitt, and NEWS-2 scores for predicting mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients.

Design: An observational retrospective study was conducted involving patients with sepsis or septic shock.

Methods: Data were collected between 2023 and 2024. Baseline measures included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. All subjects were identified from a database of a highly complex healthcare institution focused on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular and neurovascular diseases. The scores qSOFA, SOFA, NEWS-2, and qPitt were collected from medical records and analyzed. A sample size was estimated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis was established for each score. A multivariate analysis adjusted for confounding factors through logistic regression was performed.

Results: A total of 126 participants were included, with a median age of 72 years (IQR: 59-81), and 76 (60.32%) being men. The overall mortality rate in the population was 19.8%, with 84% of deaths occurring in males. Statistically significant differences in variables such as heart failure, mild liver disease, and atrial fibrillation were observed between the groups (p < 0.05). The NEWS-2 score with a cut-off point of ⩾8 showed a significant association with mortality (p = 0.0001). The AUROC for NEWS-2 was 0.80, compared to a ROC of 0.6960 for qPitt, 0.6776 for SOFA, and 0.5868 for qSOFA (χ2 = 16.60, Prob > χ2 = 0.0009).

Conclusion: NEWS 2 exhibits better performance in predicting mortality among elderly adults with cardiovascular and neurovascular diseases suffering from sepsis or septic shock, compared to the qPitt, SOFA, and qSOFA scores.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信