Impact of Visual Input and Kinesiophobia on Postural Control and Quality of Life in Older Adults During One-Leg Standing Tasks.

Q2 Medicine
Paul S Sung, Dongchul Lee
{"title":"Impact of Visual Input and Kinesiophobia on Postural Control and Quality of Life in Older Adults During One-Leg Standing Tasks.","authors":"Paul S Sung, Dongchul Lee","doi":"10.3390/vision9010024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual conditions significantly influence fear of movement (FOM), which is a condition that impairs postural control and quality of life (QOL). This study examined how visual conditions influence sway velocity during repeated one-leg standing tasks and explored the potential relationship between postural control, FOM, and QOL in older adults with and without FOM. Thirty-seven older adults with FOM and 37 controls participated in the study. Postural sway velocity was measured across three repeated trials under visual conditions in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions. The groups demonstrated significant interaction under visual conditions (F = 7.43, <i>p</i> = 0.01). In the eyes-closed condition, the FOM group exhibited faster ML sway velocity than the control group, with significant differences across all three trials. There was a significant interaction between sway direction and vision (F = 27.41, <i>p</i> = 0.001). In addition, the FOM demonstrated strong negative correlations with several QOL measures on social functioning (r = -0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and role limitations due to emotional problems (r = -0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.001) in the FOM group. While FOM influenced sway velocity during balance tasks, visual input emerged as a key determinant of postural control. The FOM group demonstrated a heightened reliance on vision, suggesting an increased need for vision-dependent strategies to maintain balance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9010024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual conditions significantly influence fear of movement (FOM), which is a condition that impairs postural control and quality of life (QOL). This study examined how visual conditions influence sway velocity during repeated one-leg standing tasks and explored the potential relationship between postural control, FOM, and QOL in older adults with and without FOM. Thirty-seven older adults with FOM and 37 controls participated in the study. Postural sway velocity was measured across three repeated trials under visual conditions in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions. The groups demonstrated significant interaction under visual conditions (F = 7.43, p = 0.01). In the eyes-closed condition, the FOM group exhibited faster ML sway velocity than the control group, with significant differences across all three trials. There was a significant interaction between sway direction and vision (F = 27.41, p = 0.001). In addition, the FOM demonstrated strong negative correlations with several QOL measures on social functioning (r = -0.69, p = 0.001) and role limitations due to emotional problems (r = -0.58, p = 0.001) in the FOM group. While FOM influenced sway velocity during balance tasks, visual input emerged as a key determinant of postural control. The FOM group demonstrated a heightened reliance on vision, suggesting an increased need for vision-dependent strategies to maintain balance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信