Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the attitudes to disability scale in people with physical disabilities.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mahnaz Pouresmaeil, Tahereh Dehdari, Isa Mohammadi Zeidi, Neda Mohammadi, Seyed Habib A Rahmati
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the attitudes to disability scale in people with physical disabilities.","authors":"Mahnaz Pouresmaeil, Tahereh Dehdari, Isa Mohammadi Zeidi, Neda Mohammadi, Seyed Habib A Rahmati","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02493-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One way to gain insight into the social construction of disability is by examining the attitudes of individuals with disabilities toward disability itself. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Attitudes to Disability Scale (ADS) within a sample of individuals with physical disabilities. This psychometric study employed a forward-backward translation process to translate the general items of the ADS from English to Persian. The instrument's validity and reliability were subsequently evaluated. The face and content validity of the instrument items were assessed. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to verify the factor structure of the ADS, based on data from 172 individuals with physical disabilities, aged 22 to 60. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency of the ADS subscales. Both the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) for all items were found to be acceptable. The results of CFA revealed that the 16 items of the ADS loaded onto four distinct factors: inclusion (4 items), discrimination (4 items), gains (4 items), and prospects (4 items). The four-factor ADS demonstrated good fit indices, with a root mean square error of approximation of 0.054, a root mean square residual of 0.054, a comparative fit index of 0.93, a relative Chi-square (χ²/df) of 1.50, a Tucker-Lewis index of 0.914, and a goodness of fit index of 0.906. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.70 for the inclusion, discrimination, and prospects subscales, 0.73 for the gain subscale, and 0.76 for the overall scale. In conclusion, the findings indicate that the Persian version of the ADS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing attitudes toward disability among individuals with physical disabilities in Iran.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"307"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02493-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One way to gain insight into the social construction of disability is by examining the attitudes of individuals with disabilities toward disability itself. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Attitudes to Disability Scale (ADS) within a sample of individuals with physical disabilities. This psychometric study employed a forward-backward translation process to translate the general items of the ADS from English to Persian. The instrument's validity and reliability were subsequently evaluated. The face and content validity of the instrument items were assessed. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to verify the factor structure of the ADS, based on data from 172 individuals with physical disabilities, aged 22 to 60. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency of the ADS subscales. Both the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) for all items were found to be acceptable. The results of CFA revealed that the 16 items of the ADS loaded onto four distinct factors: inclusion (4 items), discrimination (4 items), gains (4 items), and prospects (4 items). The four-factor ADS demonstrated good fit indices, with a root mean square error of approximation of 0.054, a root mean square residual of 0.054, a comparative fit index of 0.93, a relative Chi-square (χ²/df) of 1.50, a Tucker-Lewis index of 0.914, and a goodness of fit index of 0.906. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.70 for the inclusion, discrimination, and prospects subscales, 0.73 for the gain subscale, and 0.76 for the overall scale. In conclusion, the findings indicate that the Persian version of the ADS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing attitudes toward disability among individuals with physical disabilities in Iran.

身体残障人士伊朗版残疾态度量表的心理测量特性。
了解残疾的社会建构的一种方法是考察残疾个体对残疾本身的态度。本研究旨在评估波斯语版残疾态度量表(ADS)在身体残疾个体样本中的心理测量特性。本心理测量学研究采用正向-倒向翻译的方法,将ADS的一般项目从英语翻译成波斯语。随后对仪器的有效性和可靠性进行了评估。评估了量表项目的表面效度和内容效度。采用验证性因子分析(Confirmatory Factor Analysis, CFA)对172名年龄在22岁至60岁的身体残疾人士的数据进行验证性因子分析。计算Cronbach's alpha来评估ADS分量表的内部一致性。所有项目的内容效度指数(CVI)和内容效度比(CVR)均可接受。CFA结果显示,16个ADS条目加载到4个不同的因素上:包含(4个)、歧视(4个)、收益(4个)和前景(4个)。四因子ADS具有良好的拟合指标,近似均方根误差为0.054,均方根残差为0.054,比较拟合指数为0.93,相对卡方(χ²/df)为1.50,Tucker-Lewis指数为0.914,拟合优度指数为0.906。纳入、歧视和前景分量表的α值为0.70,增益分量表的α值为0.73,总体分量表的α值为0.76。总之,研究结果表明波斯语版的ADS是评估伊朗身体残疾人士对残疾态度的可靠和有效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信