Comparative Study of Proximal Caries Formation and Decay, Missing, Filled Teeth Scores in Clear Aligners and Fixed Orthodontic Treatments.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Semanur Çetin, Berat Serdar Akdeniz
{"title":"Comparative Study of Proximal Caries Formation and Decay, Missing, Filled Teeth Scores in Clear Aligners and Fixed Orthodontic Treatments.","authors":"Semanur Çetin, Berat Serdar Akdeniz","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate proximal caries formation and Decay, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) scores during clear aligner (CA) therapy compared with fixed orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 patients with a mean age of 19.9 years were divided into two equal groups (n=25) according to treatment method. Both CA and fixed appliance (FA) patients had low-to-medium levels of crowding. Caries formation and DMFT scores were assessed via radiographic and clinical examination before treatment (T0) and at the end of a six-month observation period (T1). The numbers of caries lesions and fillings was analyzed using a Two-Way Analysis of Variance with a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant statistical differences were found for both groups (p<0.001). The amount of proximal caries significantly increased in both groups, whereas the increase in non-proximal caries was only statistically significant in the FA group. DMFT scores also increased significantly in both groups, with the FA group showing a higher increase at the end of the observation period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although CAs had an advantage in decreasing the overall risk of caries, no distinct advantage was found in reducing the risk of proximal caries lesions. The DMFT index was significantly higher in fixed orthodontic treatment patients than in CA treatment patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"38 1","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate proximal caries formation and Decay, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) scores during clear aligner (CA) therapy compared with fixed orthodontic treatment.

Methods: A total of 50 patients with a mean age of 19.9 years were divided into two equal groups (n=25) according to treatment method. Both CA and fixed appliance (FA) patients had low-to-medium levels of crowding. Caries formation and DMFT scores were assessed via radiographic and clinical examination before treatment (T0) and at the end of a six-month observation period (T1). The numbers of caries lesions and fillings was analyzed using a Two-Way Analysis of Variance with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: Significant statistical differences were found for both groups (p<0.001). The amount of proximal caries significantly increased in both groups, whereas the increase in non-proximal caries was only statistically significant in the FA group. DMFT scores also increased significantly in both groups, with the FA group showing a higher increase at the end of the observation period.

Conclusion: Although CAs had an advantage in decreasing the overall risk of caries, no distinct advantage was found in reducing the risk of proximal caries lesions. The DMFT index was significantly higher in fixed orthodontic treatment patients than in CA treatment patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信