Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Feeding Disorders: A Narrative Literature Review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Hugo Pergeline, Léo Gonnet, Arnaud Fernandez, Federico Solla, François Poinso, Jokthan Guivarch
{"title":"Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Feeding Disorders: A Narrative Literature Review.","authors":"Hugo Pergeline, Léo Gonnet, Arnaud Fernandez, Federico Solla, François Poinso, Jokthan Guivarch","doi":"10.3390/children12030333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The definitions of feeding disorders of infants and young children were historically based on a dichotomic organic/non-organic vision. Since 2019, a new definition of pediatric feeding disorders (PFDs) has reshaped the understanding of these disorders with a global vision. The aim of this study is to obtain a better understanding of the diagnostic criteria for general practice, both by exploring the evolution of classifications and by clearing the actual definition of PFDs and their possible treatments. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a narrative review of the literature, including 36 articles about PFDs, excluding adolescents, anorexia nervosa, bulimia, pica, rumination, and specific neurodevelopmental or chronic pediatric disorders. We summarized these studies in three parts: the specific classifications for children before puberty, the current definition, and the clinical guidelines. <b>Results</b>: Concerning the history of the classifications, we summarized the studies of Chatoor and Kerzner and the older pediatric vision of failure to thrive. For the definition of pediatric feeding disorders, we presented this new category involving at least one out of four domains: medical, nutritional, feeding skills, or psychosocial. For the main clinical guidelines, we presented recommendations for both severe and common PFDs in each altered domain for use in daily practice. <b>Conclusions:</b> The new definition promotes a transdisciplinary vision of childhood feeding disorders, which considers each of the intricate domains of PFDs. Using common terminology for PFDs could help all healthcare providers, families, and researchers to better understand and address PFDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12030333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The definitions of feeding disorders of infants and young children were historically based on a dichotomic organic/non-organic vision. Since 2019, a new definition of pediatric feeding disorders (PFDs) has reshaped the understanding of these disorders with a global vision. The aim of this study is to obtain a better understanding of the diagnostic criteria for general practice, both by exploring the evolution of classifications and by clearing the actual definition of PFDs and their possible treatments. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature, including 36 articles about PFDs, excluding adolescents, anorexia nervosa, bulimia, pica, rumination, and specific neurodevelopmental or chronic pediatric disorders. We summarized these studies in three parts: the specific classifications for children before puberty, the current definition, and the clinical guidelines. Results: Concerning the history of the classifications, we summarized the studies of Chatoor and Kerzner and the older pediatric vision of failure to thrive. For the definition of pediatric feeding disorders, we presented this new category involving at least one out of four domains: medical, nutritional, feeding skills, or psychosocial. For the main clinical guidelines, we presented recommendations for both severe and common PFDs in each altered domain for use in daily practice. Conclusions: The new definition promotes a transdisciplinary vision of childhood feeding disorders, which considers each of the intricate domains of PFDs. Using common terminology for PFDs could help all healthcare providers, families, and researchers to better understand and address PFDs.

儿科喂养障碍的诊断与治疗:叙述性文献综述。
背景/目的:婴幼儿喂养障碍的定义历来基于有机/非有机的二元视觉。自2019年以来,儿科喂养障碍(PFDs)的新定义以全球视野重塑了对这些疾病的理解。本研究的目的是通过探索分类的演变,并通过明确PFDs的实际定义及其可能的治疗方法,更好地了解一般实践的诊断标准。方法:我们对文献进行叙述性回顾,包括36篇关于PFDs的文章,不包括青少年、神经性厌食症、贪食症、异食癖、反刍以及特定的神经发育或慢性儿科疾病。我们将这些研究分为三个部分:青春期前儿童的具体分类、目前的定义和临床指南。结果:在分类的历史上,我们总结了Chatoor和Kerzner以及老年儿童发育不良视力的研究。对于儿科喂养障碍的定义,我们提出了这个新的类别,涉及至少四分之一的领域:医学,营养,喂养技能,或社会心理。对于主要的临床指南,我们提出了在日常实践中使用的每个改变领域的严重和常见pfd的建议。结论:新的定义促进了儿童喂养障碍的跨学科视野,它考虑了pfd的每个复杂领域。使用pfd的通用术语可以帮助所有医疗保健提供者、家庭和研究人员更好地理解和处理pfd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信