[Accuracy of segmented rotational motion-based osteotomy module for dental implant robot in anterior immediate implantation: an in vitro study].

Q4 Medicine
M Z Wang, R Xie, F Liu, J Q Wei, Y Chu
{"title":"[Accuracy of segmented rotational motion-based osteotomy module for dental implant robot in anterior immediate implantation: an <i>in vitro</i> study].","authors":"M Z Wang, R Xie, F Liu, J Q Wei, Y Chu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20250120-00027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To preliminarily evaluate the accuracy of a segmented rotational motion-based osteotomy module for autonomous dental implant robots in immediate implant placement in the anterior region through an <i>in vitro</i> model experiment, providing references for clinical practice. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-three identical commercial maxillary resin models with dentition defects for immediate implant placement were divided into three groups: a fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) group (<i>n</i>=5), a robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (rCAIS) group based on conventional coronal-apical linear motion osteotomy (rCAIS-C, <i>n</i>=9) and a rCAIS group based on segmented rotational motion osteotomy (rCAIS-S, <i>n</i>=9). Two implants were placed in each model using the corresponding surgical protocols. Intraoral scan data of pre-and post-operative models were imported into software to evaluate deviations between the actual and planned implant positions. <b>Results:</b> In the rCAIS-S group, the global deviations at the implant platform and apex were 0.50 (0.32) mm and 0.52 (0.22) mm, respectively, with an angular deviation of 1.08° (0.49°). These values were significantly smaller than those in the sCAIS group [platform: 0.88 (0.50) mm, apex: 1.44 (0.50) mm, angular deviation: 2.86° (1.76°), <i>P</i><0.05]. rCAIS-S group also showed significantly smaller platform and apex deviations compared to rCAIS-C group [platform: 0.69 (0.12) mm, apex: 0.94 (0.16) mm, <i>P</i><0.05], though angular deviations of rCAIS-S group did not differ significantly from rCAIS-C group [1.27° (0.56°), <i>P</i>>0.05]. <b>Conclusions:</b> Within the limitation of this study, the segmented rotational motion-based osteotomy module for dental implant robots demonstrates superior accuracy in immediate implant placement in the anterior area compared to sCAIS and rCAIS based on conventional coronal-apical linear motion osteotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23965,"journal":{"name":"中华口腔医学杂志","volume":"60 4","pages":"375-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20250120-00027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To preliminarily evaluate the accuracy of a segmented rotational motion-based osteotomy module for autonomous dental implant robots in immediate implant placement in the anterior region through an in vitro model experiment, providing references for clinical practice. Methods: Twenty-three identical commercial maxillary resin models with dentition defects for immediate implant placement were divided into three groups: a fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) group (n=5), a robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (rCAIS) group based on conventional coronal-apical linear motion osteotomy (rCAIS-C, n=9) and a rCAIS group based on segmented rotational motion osteotomy (rCAIS-S, n=9). Two implants were placed in each model using the corresponding surgical protocols. Intraoral scan data of pre-and post-operative models were imported into software to evaluate deviations between the actual and planned implant positions. Results: In the rCAIS-S group, the global deviations at the implant platform and apex were 0.50 (0.32) mm and 0.52 (0.22) mm, respectively, with an angular deviation of 1.08° (0.49°). These values were significantly smaller than those in the sCAIS group [platform: 0.88 (0.50) mm, apex: 1.44 (0.50) mm, angular deviation: 2.86° (1.76°), P<0.05]. rCAIS-S group also showed significantly smaller platform and apex deviations compared to rCAIS-C group [platform: 0.69 (0.12) mm, apex: 0.94 (0.16) mm, P<0.05], though angular deviations of rCAIS-S group did not differ significantly from rCAIS-C group [1.27° (0.56°), P>0.05]. Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, the segmented rotational motion-based osteotomy module for dental implant robots demonstrates superior accuracy in immediate implant placement in the anterior area compared to sCAIS and rCAIS based on conventional coronal-apical linear motion osteotomy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华口腔医学杂志
中华口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9692
期刊介绍: Founded in August 1953, Chinese Journal of Stomatology is a monthly academic journal of stomatology published publicly at home and abroad, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and co-sponsored by the Chinese Stomatology Association. It mainly reports the leading scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the field of oral medicine, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding role in oral clinical practice and is closely combined with oral clinical practice. Chinese Journal of Over the years, Stomatology has been published in Medline, Scopus database, Toxicology Abstracts Database, Chemical Abstracts Database, American Cancer database, Russian Abstracts database, China Core Journal of Science and Technology, Peking University Core Journal, CSCD and other more than 20 important journals at home and abroad Physical medicine database and retrieval system included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信